Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T01:21:38.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate debt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Garry Young
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A topic of some current interest to forecasters and policymakers is the extent to which the high levels of corporate indebtedness observed throughout the late-1980s contributed to the recession and whether the still substantial debts of the corporate sector are likely to make the recovery from recession slower than normal. The purpose of this note is to present and provide an interpretation of the evidence bearing on this issue.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 139 , February 1992 , pp. 88 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

I am grateful to Andrew Britton and Nigel Pain for comments on an earlier version of this note.

References

Ireland, Jonathan and Simon Wren-Lewis (1989), ‘Buffer stock money and the company sector’, National Institute Discussion Paper no.151.Google Scholar
Sargent, J.R. (1991), ‘Deregulation, debt and downturn in the UK economy’,National Institute Economic Review, no. 137, August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadhwani, S. and Wall, M. (1986), ‘The UK capital stock—new estimates of premature scrapping’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 2, no. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wren-Lewis, Simon (1988), ‘Supply, liquidity and credit: a new version of the Institute's domestic econometric macromodel’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 126, November.Google Scholar
Young, Garry (1991), ‘An equilibrium model of company finance and the cost of capital’, National Institute Discussion Paper no.4—new series.Google Scholar