Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T14:56:45.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Has the EMS changed wage and price behaviour in Europe?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Ray Barrell
Ray Barrell*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
*
∗I would like to thank Andrew Britton, Julia Darby, Colin Donaldson, Nigel Pain and Peter Westaway at the Institute and Alex Bowen at NEDO for their help and advice in undertaking this research. This note is based on a study by Barrell, Darby and Donaldson (1990) financed by NEDO.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Macroeconomic performance in Europe was generally agreed to have been poor in the 1970s, with high inflation and low growth. The 1980s saw a significant improvement, with inflation being reduced to under 5 per cent by the end of the decade, and growth reaching some sort of peak in 1989. There were many factors contributing to this improved performance, and the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) of the European Monetary System (EMS) has been given much of the credit. The ERM was supposed to have given the monetary authorities in France and Italy increased anti-inflationary credibility. Their decision to link their exchange rates to the D-Mark involved a commitment to follow German monetary policy and hence involved taking on German anti-inflationary credibility.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 134 , November 1990 , pp. 64 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Artis, M.J. and Taylor, M.P. (1989) ‘Exchange Rates, Interest Rates, Capital Controls and the EMS’ p185–206 in Giavazzi, F, Micossi, S. and Miller, M., The European Monetary System, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrell, R.J. (1990) ‘The EMS and EMU’ National Institute Economic Review, No. 132 May 1990.Google Scholar
Barrell, R.J., Darby, J., and Donaldson, C. (1990) ‘Structural stability in European wage and price systems’, National Institute Discussion Paper no. 188.Google Scholar
Barrell, R.J. and Eastwood, F. (1988) ‘The World Economy’ Ch.2 in National Institute Economic Review no. 123, February 1988.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L., Durbin, J., and Evans, J.M. (1985), ‘Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, no. 37, pp. 149–92.Google Scholar
Carruth, A. and Oswald, A. (1987) ‘Wage Inflexibility in Britain’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics February 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, L. and Driffel, J. (1988). ‘Centralisation of wage bargaining and macroeconomic performance’, Economic Policy, April 1988.Google Scholar
European Commission, (1990), ‘One market, one money’, European Economy, no. 44, October.Google Scholar
Harvey, A. (1990), The Econometric Analysis of Time Series, Phillip Allen, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, H.G. (1973) Further Essays in Monetary Economics see Esp Ch7. George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Joyce, M. and Wren-Lewis, S. (1991) ‘Does the NAIRU matter?’, Economic Journal, May 1991 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Nickell, S. (1984) ‘The modelling of wages and employment’ in Econometrics and Quantitative Economics ed Hendry, D. and Wallis, K.B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
O.E.C.D. (1988) ‘Structural Adjustment and Economic Performance’ Paris.Google Scholar