Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:30:01.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

One pillar crumbling, the others too short: old-age provision in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Martin Werding*
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy and Public Finance, Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Abstract

Responding to the challenges of demographic ageing, the German system of old-age provision has undergone substantial changes during the past two decades and is in fact still under reconstruction. Benefit levels deriving from the public pay-as-you-go scheme will decline until 2060, while contribution rates may still go up substantially. Additional cover from private or occupational pension schemes is urgently needed. Thus far, steps in this direction have been half-hearted. The continuing crisis in financial markets and a more profound distrust in financial institutions and market-based instruments of old-age provision currently create obstacles to progress with this overhaul. Nevertheless, despite the differing traditions, Germany could learn important lessons now from other developed countries that have longer experience of funded pensions.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barr, N. (2002), ‘Reforming pensions: myths, truths, and policy choices’, International Social Security Review, 55(2), pp. 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, N. and Diamond, P.A. (2006), ‘The economics of pensions’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1), pp. 1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. (2005), ‘What are NDC pension systems?’, in Holzmann, R. and Palmer, E. (eds), Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects of Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes, Washington D.C.: World Bank, pp. 3556.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Coppola, M. and Rausch, J. (2015), Die ‘Rente mit 63’: wer sind die Begünstigten?’, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 16 (3), pp. 264–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Coppola, M. and Reil-Held, A. (2012), ‘Riester pensions in Germany: design, dynamics, targeting success and crowding-in’, MEA Discussion Paper No. 20-2012.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Gasche, M. and Wilke, C.B. (2009), Auswirkungen der Finanzkrise auf die Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung, ihre Beitragszahler und ihre Rentner, MEA Studies No. 9, Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Gasche, M. and Wilke, C.B. (2010), Konjunkturabhängigkeit der Gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung am Beispiel der aktuellen Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise’, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik 59 (3), pp. 298328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A., Reil-Held, A. and Schunk, D. (2008), ‘Saving incentives, old-age provision and displacement effects: evidence from the recent German pension reform’, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 7(3), pp. 295319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, F. (1989), ‘On the intergenerational Pareto efficiency of pay-as-you-go financed pension systems’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145(4), pp. 643–58.Google Scholar
Bucher-Koenen, Tabea (2011), ‘Financial literacy, Riester pensions, and other private old age provision in Germany’, MEA Discussion Paper No. 250-2011.Google Scholar
Bucher-Koenen, T. and Ziegelmeyer, M. (2014), ‘Once burned, twice shy? Financial literacy and wealth losses during the financial crisis’, Review of Finance, 18(6), pp. 2215–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttler, A. (2015), Einführung in die betriebliche Altersversorgung, 7th ed., Karlsruhe: Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft.Google Scholar
Cigno, A. and Werding, M. (2007), Children and Pensions, Cambridge, MA, London: MIT-Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P.A. (2002), Social Security Reform, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disney, R. (1999), ‘Notional accounts as a pension reform strategy: an evaluation’, World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 9928.Google Scholar
Disney, R. (2003), ‘Public pension reform in Europe: policies, prospects and evaluation’, The World Economy 26 (10), pp. 14251445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2015), ‘Statistik zur privaten Altersvorsorge’, http://www.bmas.de/DE/Themen/Rente/Zusaetzliche-Altersvorsorge/statistik-zusaetzlichealtersvorsorge.html (last accessed: 4 December 2015).Google Scholar
Federal Statistical Office (2014), Staatliche Förderung der Riesterrente 2010, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
Fenge, R. (1995), ‘Pareto-efficiency of the pay-as-you-go pension system with intragenerational fairness’, Finanzarchiv, 52(3), pp. 357363.Google Scholar
Fenge, R. and Werding, M. (2004), ‘Ageing and the tax implied in public pension schemes: simulations for selected OECD countries’, Fiscal Studies, 25(2), pp. 159200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasche, M., Börsch-Supan, A. and Ziegelmeyer, M. (2010), ‘Auswirkungen der Finanzkrise auf die private Altersvorsorge’, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 11(4), pp. 383406.Google Scholar
Gasche, M. and Kluth, S. (2011), ‘Auf der Suche nach der besten Rentenanpassungsformel’, MEA Discussion Paper No. 241-2011.Google Scholar
Martin, J.P. and Whitehouse, E. (2008), ‘Reforming retirement-income systems: lessons from the recent experiences of OECD countries’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 66.Google Scholar
Meier, V. and Werding, M. (2010), ‘Ageing and the welfare state: securing sustainability’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(4), pp. 655–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, O.S. and Utkus, S.P. (eds) (2004), Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2015), ‘Real GDP, annual growth rate (%)’, https://data.oecd.org/gdp/real-gdp-forecast.htm (last accessed: 30 November 2015).Google Scholar
Pfarr, C. and Schneider, U. (2013), ‘Choosing between subsidized or unsubsidized private pension schemes: Evidence from German panel data’, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 12(1), pp. 6291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robalino, D.A. and Bodor, A. (2007), ‘On the financial sustainability of earnings-related pension schemes with ‘pay-as-you-go’ financing and the role of government-indexed bonds’, JournalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
of Pension Economics and Finance, 8(2), pp. 153–87.Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (2000), ‘Why a funded pension system is needed and why it is not needed’, International Tax and Public Finance, 7 (4/5), pp. 389410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TNS Infratest (2012), Alterssicherung in Deutschland 2011 (ASID 2011), Forschungsbericht No. 431/Z, Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.Google Scholar
TNS Infratest (2015), Trägerbefragung zur betrieblichen Altersversorgung (BAV 2013), Forschungsbericht No. 449/1, Berlin: Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales.Google Scholar
Werding, M. (2007), ‘Social insurance: how to pay for pensions and health care?’, in Hamm, I., Seitz, H. and Werding, M. (eds), Demographic Change in Germany: The Economic and Fiscal Consequences, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, pp. 89128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werding, M. (2013), Modell für flexible Simulationen zu den Effekten des demographischen Wandels für die öffentlichen Finanzen in Deutschland bis 2060: Daten, Annahmen und Methoden, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Werding, M. (2014), ‘Demographischer Wandel und öffentliche Finanzen’, SVR-Arbeitspapier No. 1/2014.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Werding Supplementary Material

Werding Supplementary Material

Download Werding Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 72.4 KB