Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:03:53.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The UK and EMU: Choosing the Regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Ray Barrell
Ray Barrell*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research
*
e-mail: r.barrell@niesr.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The UK has to make a decision on membership of EMU in the next two years. The monetary and fiscal regimes in the Euro Area and in the UK do not differ greatly. However, we argue that membership of EMU will increase the stability of the economy and the credibility of the policy framework, and hence will enhance the prospects for growth and higher incomes and employment. There appear to be no major problems associated with joining EMU at around 1.50 euros to the pound, although there are risks to the UK if the euro appreciates against the dollar after we have entered. However, the costs associated with this risk have to be offset against the probability of the significant output gains that could come from EMU membership in the medium term.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 180 , April 2002 , pp. 54 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

I would like to thank Nigel Pain, Mary O'Mahony and Martin Weale for their comments. All views expressed, and all remaining errors, are mine.

References

Artis, M. (2000), ‘Should the UK join EMU?’ National Institute Economic Review, 172, January.Google Scholar
Ashworth, P.Hubert, F., Pain, N. and Riley, R. (2001), ‘UK fixed capital formation: determinants and constraints’, report prepared for Department of Trade and Industry and CBI/TUC Working Group on Investment.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. (2001), ‘Forecasting the world economy’, in Hendry, D. F. and Ericsson, N.R. (Eds), Understanding Economic Forecasts, Cambridge, MA., MIT Press, pp. 152–173.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Dury, K. (2000), ‘Choosing the regime: macroeconomic effects of UK entry into EMU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 30 (4).Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Dury, K. (2000a), ‘An evaluation of monetary targeting regimes’, National Institute Economic Review, 174, October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R. and Dury, K. (2001), ‘The Stability and Growth Pact, will it ever be breached? An analysis using stochastic simulations’, in Brunila, A., Buti, M. and Franco, D. (Eds), The Stability and Growth Pact: The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Basingstoke, Palgrave.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Dury, K., Hurst, I. and Pain, N. (2001), ‘Modelling the world economy: the NIESR model NiGEM’, presented at an ENEPRI workshop, Paris, July, available on www.niesr.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Pain, N. (1998), ‘Choosing the rate again’, in The UK and Preparations for Stage Three of Economic and Monetary Union, Treasury Committee Fifth Report, Session 1997-98, House of Commons 503-III, pp. 17–23.Google Scholar
Brunila, A., Buti, M. and Franco, D. (2001), The Stability and Growth Pact: The Architecture of Fiscal Policy in EMU, Basingstoke, Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, J. and Davis, P. (2002), ‘Uncertainty and Investment in the G7’, paper presented at the NIESR macro users group May 2002, mimeo, available from NIESR.Google Scholar
Byrne, J. and Davis, P. (2002a), ‘A comparison of balance sheet structures in Major EU countries’, National Institute Economic Review, 180, April.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmfors, L. (Ed.) (1997), EMU: A Swedish Perspective, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruth, A., Dickerson, A., and Henley, A. (2000), ‘Econometric modelling of UK aggregate investment: the role of profits and uncertainty’, The Manchester School, 68, pp. 276–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthbertson, K. and Gasparro, D. (1995), ‘Fixed investment, decisions in UK manufacturing: the importance of Tobin's Q, output and debt’, European Economic Review, 39, pp. 919–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, J., Hughes Hallett, A., Ireland, J., and Piscatelli, L. (1999), ‘The impact of exchange rate uncertainty on the level of investment’, Economic Journal, 109, C55–C67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E.P. (2002), ‘The City, financial centre development and EMU’, talk given at NIESR/CEPII conference on EMU and British Businesss, February. PPT version available from NIESR.Google Scholar
Driver, R.L. and Wren-Lewis, S. (1998), ‘Real exchange rates for the year 2000’, Institute for International Economics, Policy Analyses in International Economics No. 54, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Driver, R.L. and Wren-Lewis, S. (1999), ‘FEERs: a sensitivity analysis’, in MacDonald, R. and Stein, J. (Eds), Equilibrium Exchange Rates, Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
European Central Bank (2001), ‘Framework and tools of monetary analysis’, ECB Monthly Bulletin, May.Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (2002), ‘Economic policy for the information economy’, Kansas City. Jackson Hole conference proceedings available on http://www.kc.frb.org/Publicat/sympos/2001/sym01prg.htm.Google Scholar
Fitz Gerald, J. (2001), ‘Managing an economy under EMU: the case of Ireland’, World Economy, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitz Gerald, J. and Honohan, P. (1997), ‘EMU - reaching a narrow verdict’, Irish Banking Review, Spring.Google Scholar
Gaspar, V. and Smets, F. (2000), ‘Price level stability: some issues’, National Institute Economic Review, 178, October.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C.A.E. (2001), ‘The inflation forecast’, National Institute Economic Review, 175, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and growth in the global economy, Cambridge, MA., MIT Press.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (1997), UK membership of the single currency: an assessment of the five economic tests (October), PDF available at http://www.hm-Treasury.gov.uk/documents/the_euro/euro_index_index.cfm.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2001), Preliminary and technical work to prepare for the assessment of the five tests for UK membership of the single currency (November), PDF available at http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/documents/the_euro/euro_index_index.cfm.Google Scholar
Honohan, P. (2001), ‘Discussion’, commenting on Persson, T. ‘Currency unions and trade: how large is the treatment effect?’ Economic Policy, 16, 33, October, pp. 435–448.Google Scholar
Kneller, R. and Young, G. (2001), ‘Business cycle volatility, uncertainty and long run growth’, The Manchester School, 69, pp. 534–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLennan, D., Muellbauer, J. and Stephens, M. (1998), ‘Asymmetries in housing and financial market institutions and EMU’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14/3, pp. 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, P. and Morgan, J. (2001), ‘Analysing the transmission mechanism using structural macroeconomic models: the issues and some results’, ECB Working Paper No. 93.Google Scholar
Minford, P. (2001), ‘Tests 1 and 2: flexibility and the costs in economic variability’, in Bush, J. (Ed.), The Economic Case Against the Euro, New Europe for The No Campaign, downloadable at www.no-euro.com.67-78.Google Scholar
O'Donoghue, J. and Wilkie, C. (1998), ‘Harmonised index of consumer prices’, Economic Trends, 532, pp 34–44.Google Scholar
OECD (2001), Economic Outlook, No. 70, December.Google Scholar
O'Mahony, M. (2002), ‘Productivity and convergence in the EU’, National Institute Economic Review, 180, April.Google Scholar
Pain, N. (2002), ‘EMU, investment and growth: some unresolved issues’, National Institute Economic Review, 180, April.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, A.K. (2000), ‘One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade’, Economic Policy, 30, pp. 9–45.Google Scholar
Rose, A.K. (2001), ‘Currency unions and trade: the effect is large’, Economic Policy, 16, 33, October, pp. 433–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinn, H.W. and Reutter, M. (2001), ‘The minimum inflation rate for the Euroland’, NBER Working Paper No. 8085.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (2000), ‘The Zero bound in an open economy: a foolproof way of escaping from a liquidity trap’, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 2566.Google Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S., Westaway, P., Soteri, S. and Barrell, R.J. (1991), ‘Choosing the rate’, Manchester School, June.Google Scholar