Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T20:48:10.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ethnic Democracy Thesis and the Citizenship Question in Estonia and Latvia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Graham Smith
Graham Smith*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although a number of commentaries exist on the citizenship question in Estonia and Latvia, there is as yet no study that develops a conceptual framework which considers the particularity of these citizen-state formations and the implications that follow for ethnic relations. Based on a series of decrees culminating in their respective citizenship laws of 1992 and 1994, both Estonia and Latvia opted to exclude a third of their permanent residents, made up mostly of the Russian-speaking population, from being granted an automatic right to membership of the citizenpolity. This differed from the other post-Soviet states who granted citizenship to all those permanently residing within their bounded territory at the moment the declaration of statehood. This article, therefore, aims to redress this blank spot in conceptual theorizing by considering Estonia and Latvia as polities that come close to resembling ethnic democracies.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 199 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 Association for the Study of Nationalities of Eastern Europe and ex-USSR, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. It should also be noted that most commentaries on the citizenship question focus on either Estonia or Latvia; there has been little attempt to examine them within a comparative context. Some of the existing literature include: Park, A., 1994, “Ethnicity and Independence: The Case of Estonia in Comparative Perspective,” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1994, pp. 69–87; Vetik, R., “Ethnic Conflict and Accommodation in Post-Communist Estonia,” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1993, pp. 271-280; P. Kolsto, The New Russian Diaspora (London: Hurst, 1994); Karklins, R., Ethnopolitics and Transition to Democracy. The Collapse of the USSR and Latvia (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994); P. Kask, National Radicalization in Estonia: Legislation on Citizenship and Related Issues, Nationalities Papers, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1994, pp. 379-392; M. Kirch and A. Kirch, “Search for Security in Estonia: New Identity Architecture,” Security Dialogue, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1995, pp. 439-449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. By October 1994, 110,000 non-Estonians out of 600,000 had received citizenship; in Latvia, as of January 1994, 364,036 non-Latvians out of 1,015,887 had acquired citizenship. Data from their respective Central Government Statistical Offices, Tallinn and Riga, 1994.Google Scholar

3. Smooha, S. and Hanf, T., “The Diverse Modes of Conflict Regulation in Deeply Divided Societies” in Smith, A., ed., Ethnicity and Nationalism (Leiden, 1992), p. 32. See also S. Smooha, “Minority Status in an Ethnic Democracy: The Status of the Arab Minority in Israel, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1990, pp. 389–413. For a critique of the ethnic democracy model, see O. Yiftachel, “The Concept of ’Ethnic Democracy‘ and Its Applicability to the Case of Israel,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1993, pp. 125-136.Google Scholar

4. According to Yiftachel's work on Malaysia, that country also displays the characteristics of an ethnic democracy; see Yiftachel, op. cit., 1993.Google Scholar

5. , Smooha and , Hanf, op. cit., 1992, p. 32.Google Scholar

6. Subsequent 1995 citizenship legislation in Estonia has extended a residency qualification to five years, although this does not affect residents who qualified under the 1992 citizenship legislation.Google Scholar

7. For studies concerning the ethnic composition of political parties and representation in their respective parliaments, see Smith, G., Aasland, A. and Mole, R., “Statehood, Ethnic Relations and Citizenship” in G. Smith, ed., The Baltic States. The National Self-Determination of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (London: Macmillan Press, 1994), pp. 181–205.Google Scholar

8. Natsional'nyi sostav naseleniya SSR (Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 1991). In contrast, more recent surveys of the Russian settlers would suggest that the 1989 Soviet census figures are on the high side. See Rose, R. and Maley, W., Nationalities in the Baltic States: A Survey Study (Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde, Public Policy Paper No. 222, 1994), p. 52.Google Scholar

9. A New Law on Local Elections in Estonia was passed in October 1993 in which non-citizens, provided they have resided in their electoral constituency for five years, have the right to vote and stand for election.Google Scholar

10. On 26 October 1993, a law was passed in Estonia granting citizens of minority groups the right to apply for cultural autonomy. Accordingly, non-Estonians have the right to establish their own educational institutions and local councils to handle cultural issues. This, however, does not apply to permanent residents without citizenship. Consequently, in predominantly Russian, ‘non-citizen’ cities like Sillamae in north-east Estonia, whose inhabitants have little or no knowledge of the state language, and despite the municipal government petitioning both in 1995 and 1996 for the right to use the Russian language along with Estonian in official business, it has been unsuccessful.Google Scholar

11. Smith, A. and Williams, C., “The National Construction of Social Space,” Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1993.Google Scholar

12. For considerations of the formation of the Popular Fronts, see Smith, G., “The Emergence of Nationalism” in G Smith, ed., The Baltic States. The National Self-Determination of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (London: Macmillan, 1994), pp. 121–143.Google Scholar

13. See for example, Smith, A., Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era (Oxford: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar

14. Linz, H., “From Primordialism to Nationalism” in Tiryakian, E. and Rogowski, R., Ethnic Nationalisms in the Developed West (London: Allen and Unwin, 1985), pp. 203–253.Google Scholar

15. Padomju Jaunatne, 25 July 1989.Google Scholar

16. For summaries of the programs of the respective Popular Fronts, see Narodnyi Kongress: Sbornik Materialov Kongressa Narodnogo Fronta Estonii (Tallinn, 1988); Narodnyi Front Latvii, Programma (Riga, 1988).Google Scholar

17. Narodnyi Kongress, op. cit. Google Scholar

18. Resolution No. 8 as cited in E. Rundeschiold, “Ethnic Dimension in Contemporary Latvian Politics: Focusing Forces for Change,” Soviet Studies, Vol. 44, No 4, 1992, p. 613.Google Scholar

19. Kionka, R., “Are the Baltic Laws Discriminatory?” RFE/RL Research Report, Vol. 156, 1991, pp. 21–24.Google Scholar

20. Literaturnaya gazeta, 18 July 1989.Google Scholar

21. FBIS-SOV-90–085:89.Google Scholar

22. Atmoda, 12 June 1989.Google Scholar

23. Ginsburgs, G., “The Citizenship of the Baltic States,” Journal of Baltic Studies , Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar

24. Smith, G., op. cit., 1994, pp. 86–120.Google Scholar

25. For an examination of the “founding elections” in Estonia and Latvia and their comparative impact on their respective state-building processes, see Ishiyama, J. (1993), “Founding Elections and the Development of Transitional Parties: The Cases of Estonia and Latvia, 1990-1992,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1993, pp. 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26. Diena, 3 November 1993.Google Scholar

27. Rossiskaya gazeta, 18 July 1992.Google Scholar

28. Nezavizamaya gazeta, 13 April 1993.Google Scholar

29. Nezavizamaya gazeta, 31 March 1993.Google Scholar

30. example, For, economic organizations like the European Bank For Reconstruction and Development purposely linked development aid to citizenship, a sharp reminder of the economic leverage that the West can exercise over the Baltic States.Google Scholar

31. Estonia's law on citizenship was sufficient not to act as an impediment to membership of the Council of Europe, along with Lithuania, in May 1993. Latvia, however, had to wait until February 1995. In order to become a member, Latvia had to revise its 1994 Citizenship Law, dropping proposals to implement a quota system whereby only a restricted number of non-citizens could become citizens in any given year.Google Scholar

32. Sheehy, A., “Estonia's Law on Aliens,” RFE/RL Research Report, Vol. 2, No. 38, 1993, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar

33. , Smooha and , Hanf, op. cit., 1991.Google Scholar

34. , Yiftachel op. cit., 1992, p. 130.Google Scholar

35. was, It, of course, Hirschman who first considered exit as one option to political exclusion, the others being voice and loyalty. See Hirschman, A. O., Exit, Voice and Loyalty (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

36. Postimees, 30 October 1995.Google Scholar

37. See for example, Merton, R., and Rossi, A., “Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behaviour” in R. Merton, ed., Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: The Free Press, 1968), pp. 279–344; Gurr, T., Minorities at Risk. A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts (Washington DC: Institute of Peace Studies, 1993).Google Scholar

38. Such findings include those conducted by the following: Kirch, A., Kirch, A. and Tuisk, T., “Russians in the Baltic States,” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1993, pp. 173–188; A. Kirch. and A. Kirch, “Ethnic Relations. Estonians and Non-Estonians,” Nationalities Papers, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1995, pp. 43–60; R. Rose and W. Maley, “Nationalities in the Baltic States. A Survey Study,” (Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde) No. 222, 1994, pp. 74; R. Vetik, “Estonia and the Estonians” in G. Smith, ed., The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States (London: Longman, 1995), pp. 129-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39. The public opinion survey of the ethnic Russian communities in the Baltic States was based on 517 structured interviews conducted in February 1993 in the following cities:Google Scholar

Total Population (1,000s) Core Nation Population (%) Russian Population (%)
Riga (Latvia) 910.5 36.5 47.3
Daugavpils (south-east Latvia) 124.9 13.0 58.3
Narva (north-east Estonia) 77.5 4.0 85.9
Klaipeda (Lithuania) 202.9 63.0 28.2

The choice of the four localities was based on a number of criteria: first, cities with sizable but differing types of Russian communities, including large immigrant populations; second, cities drawn from all three polities so as to compare responses with differing state policies towards citizenship; and, finally, localities where territorial secession is an option (Daugavpils and Narva). A random sample of 517 Russians were interviewed, balanced according to age and gender. For fuller details of the survey, see Smith, G., Nationality and Citizenship in the Baltic States. Report to the Institute of Peace Studies (Washington, DC, September 1994).Google Scholar

40. Rose, R. and Maley, W., op. cit., 1994, pp. 44–15.Google Scholar

41. For the results of these calculations, see Smith, op. cit., 1993.Google Scholar

42. Rose and Maley, op. cit., 1994, p. 45.Google Scholar

43. See for example, Smith, G., Aasland, A. and Mole, R., op. cit., 1994, pp. 181–205.Google Scholar

44. Russian Representative Assemblies have now been set up in all three Baltic States, the most recent being in Lithuania in November 1995. In January 1996, in Riga, representatives of all three Assemblies met to coordinate their activities and work out a common strategy for the settler communities in the Baltic region, focusing in particular on issues related to citizenship, Diena, 28 January 1996.Google Scholar

45. There is a considerable literature on resource mobilization theory. See, for example: D. Rucht, ed., Research on Social Movements (Boulder: Campus Verlag/Westview Press, 1992); S. Lyman, ed., Social Movements. Critiques, Concepts, Case Studies (London: Macmillan Press, 1995); W. Booth, P. James and H. Meadwell, eds, Politics and Rationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

46. Tarrow, S., “Comparing Social Movement Participation in Western Europe and the United States: Problems, Uses and Proposals for Synthesis” in D. Rucht, ed., op. cit., 1988, pp. 392–420.Google Scholar

47. Kolsto, P., The New Russian Diaspora (London: Hurst, 1995); A. Aasland, “The New Russian Diaspora” in G. Smith, ed., The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States (London: Longman, 2nd edition, 1995), pp. 477–497.Google Scholar

48. Oberschall, A., Social Conflict and Social Movements (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1973).Google Scholar

49. Rothschild, J., Ethnopolitics. A Conceptual Framework (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50. See, for example, Diena, 20 February 1995.Google Scholar

51. Park, A., op. cit., 1994, p. 73.Google Scholar

52. Diena, 31 January 1995.Google Scholar

53. Gurr, T., Minorities at Risk. A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts (Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press, 1993).Google Scholar

54. Pravda, 5 November 1994, p. 3.Google Scholar

55. Eamets, R., “Labour Markets and Unemployment in Estonia,” Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1994, pp. 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56. Roeder, P., “Post-Soviet Institutions and Ethnopolitics,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Science Association, New York, September 1994.Google Scholar

57. Sovetskaya Estoniya, 10 March 1989.Google Scholar

58. Krasnaya zveda, 10 October 1993, p. 3.Google Scholar

59. Melvin, N., “Forging the New Russian Nation. Russian Foreign Policy and the Russian-Speaking Communities of the Former USSR,” Discussion Paper 50, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1994, 63 pp.Google Scholar

60. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Comparative Indicators of Performance Amongst the Post-Soviet States (London, 1994).Google Scholar

61. See for example, Molodii Estonii, November 1993-December 1994.Google Scholar

62. Hanson, P. (1993), “Estonia's Narva Problem,” Research Paper, RFE/RL Research Institute, 22 April, 10 pp.Google Scholar

63. Diena, 24 January 1996.Google Scholar

64. See the editorial in Neatkariga, 16 January 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar