Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:31:40.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subrogation and Insurance Contract. Ascertainment of Proper Law. Applicable Rate of Exchange. Intertemporal Problems of Private (International) Law. Secundary Qualification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

S. F. G. Rammeloo
S. F. G. Rammeloo
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Law, University of Limburg
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Netherlands Judicial Decisions Involving Questions of Private International Law
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 429 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cf., inter alia, Sauveplanne, J.G.,’Vragen van internationaal privaatrecht rondom de cessie’, TVVS (1964'1965) p. 129Google Scholaret seq.; ibidem, ‘Overzicht der Nederlandse rechtspraak IPR 1968–1969’, WPNR No. 5144, p. 140 et seq. See, furthermore, Dalhuisen, J.H., ‘The Assignment of Claims in Dutch Private International Law’, in Comparability and Evaluation, Liber Amicorum D. Kokkini-Iatridou (1994) p. 183Google Scholar et seq.; Polak, M.V., Vermogensrechtelijkemeerpartijenverhoudingen (1993)Google Scholar Ch. 5, para. 3; L.F.A. Steffens, ‘Am. 103–105 IPR-Schets: Overgang van vorderingen’, WPNR No. 6114, p. 876 et seq.; Strikwerda, L., Inleiding totnet Nederlandse internationaal privaatrecht, 4th edn. (1995) p. 212Google Scholar et seq.; Vlas, P., Comment with regard to this court decision, Aansprakelijkheid & Verzekering (1995) No. 3, p. 64 et seq.Google Scholar

2. Cf., the comment on this case by Hudig-van, W. Lennep in 42 NILR (1995) no. 2, p. 259 et seq.Google Scholar