Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2024
Gabriel Marcel was born one hundred years ago this year. It seems fitting, then, to attempt a re-evaluation of a philosopher who was one of the seminal minds of Catholicism in the mid-twentieth century. For it follows from the nature of Catholic tradition, as an organically developing communion in Christ and his Spirit, that no such mind ever becomes ‘irrelevant’: that is, out of relation to other spirits that follow it in history. The difficulty with introducing Marcel’s religious philosophy, however, lies not so much in any seeming obsolescence, but in the character of that centre to which, again and again, Marcel returned. He was a ‘philosopher of mystery’.
Notoriously, he disliked philosophical systems, which he regarded as an affront to the Socratic spirit of continuous questioning in the search for truth. As a result, Marcel nowhere offers a systematic exposition of his own philosophy of religion. He preferred to present many of his reflections in the deliberately unsystematic form of a journal, a diary or an occasional article. At times, his meditations sprang from crucial events of his own life-time. But undergirding everything he wrote lies a constant concern to highlight the unchanging and ultimate issues of existence. He wanted to restore to words a power of signifying of which, he felt, they had been denuded. In so doing, he would help give back to language its power to reveal le poids ontologique, the ‘ontological weight’, of human experience. This ‘weight’ produces a bias—pondus meus, amor metis, inverting Augustine’s adage about how love carries one away—and this bias, if we follow where it tends, directs us towards the reality of God. In this essay I shall try to retrace the Marcellian path to transcendence whose crucial steps are three: the mystery of human personhood, the mystery of inter-subjectivity, and the mystery of hope. But let us begin with a word about the man and his setting.
1 Heinemann, F.H., Existentialism and the Modern Predicament (New York 1958?), p.135Google Scholar.
2 Marcel, G., ‘Regard en arrière’ in Gilson, E. et al., Existentialisme chritien: Gabriel Marcel (Paris 1947)Google Scholar.
3 Marcel, G., Journal mitaphysique (Paris 1927), p.279Google Scholar
4 Troisfontaines, R., De /'Existence d I'Stre. La philosophic de Gabriel Marcel (Louvain 1953)Google Scholar, I. pp.22–3.
5 Moeller, C., ‘Gabriel Marcel et le mystere de Pesperance’, Littirature du XXe siecle et christianisme IV. pp. 149–157Google Scholar.
6 Marcel, G., En chemin, vers quel éveil (Paris 1971)Google Scholar.
7 Pax, C., ‘Marcel's way of creative fidelity’, Philosophy Today Spring 1975, pp.12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; c.f. Marcel, G., The Mystery of Being (London 1950), pp.42–3Google Scholar.
8 R. Troisfontaines, De /'Existence a I'Stre. La philosophic de Gabriel Marcel op. cit. II. pp.304–5.
9 Marcel, G., Being and Having (London 1965), p. 29Google Scholar.
10 The nature and destiny of human persons is taken by Marcel to be integrating focus of philosophical investigation. See O'Malley, J.B., The Fellowship of Being. An Essay on the Concept of Person in the Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel (The Hague 1966)Google Scholar.
11 Marcel, G., Le Monde casst (Bruges‐Paris 1933), pp.256–7Google Scholar.
12 Being and Having, op. cit., p.127.
13 lb. p.137.
14 C. Pax, ‘Marcel's way of creative fidelity’, art.cit.
15 Hanratty, G., ‘The Religious Philosophy of Gabriel Marcel’, Heythrop Journal XVII. 4 (October 1976), p. 399.Google Scholar
16 See especially Marcel, G., The Mystery of Being (London 1960), II. pp.37–57Google Scholar.
17 Marcel, G., Structure de I'espirance (Paris 1951), p.76Google Scholar.
18 Being and Having op. cit. pp.135–6.
19 G. Marcel, The Mystery of Being op. cit. II. p.8.
20 lb. I. pp.182–3.
21 Marcel, G., Homo Viator (London 1951), p.134Google Scholar.
22 C. Moeller', ‘Gabriel Marcel et le mystere de I'esperance’, LitHrature du XXe siecle et le christianisme, op. cit. IV. p.224.
23 lb. p.211.
24 Homo Viator op. cit. p.60.
25 Being and Having op. cit. pp.86–7.
26 lb. p.84.
27 Homo Viator op. cit. p.36. The essay ‘Sketch of a Phenomenology and a Metaphysic of Hope’ in this collection, pp.29–67, is Marcel's most important text on this subject.
28 C. Pax, ‘Marcel's way of creative fidelity’ art. cit. p.19; c.f. Being and Having op. cit. p. 19.
29 Berger, P., A Rumour of Angels. Society and the rediscovery of the supernatural (1969: Harmondsworth 1971), p.83Google Scholar.
30 Lubac, H. de, Catholicism. Christ and the Common Destiny of Man (ET London 1950Google Scholar; 1962), p.181, with reference to Marcel's ‘Acte et personne’, in Recherches philosophiques* (1934–5), p. 160.
31 H. de Lubac, Catholicism, op. cit., pp.181–2.
32 Balthasar, H. U. von, A Theology of History (ET London 1963), pp.19–20Google Scholar.
33 Idem., Theodramatik (Einsiedeln 1973–6).
34 C.f. H. de Lubac, Catholicism, op. cit., p. 188, a reference to Marcel's Du refus a I'invocation (Paris 1940), pp.11–14.
35 Danielou, J., The Lord of History. Reflections of the Inner Meaning of History (ET London 1958), p.344Google Scholar.
36 Ibid., pp.89–90.
37 For an evocation of their shared ambience, see the preface to Balthasar, H. U. von, Henri de Lubac. Sein organisches Lebenswerk (Einsiedeln 1976)Google Scholar.
