Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T03:35:38.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Constitution and Black America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

E. Wally Miles*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University

Extract

During the week of June 20, 1983 twenty-five historians and political scientists gathered for a seminar concerning “The Constitution and Black America.” Most of the participating faculty were very positive in their evaluations of the program; many, in fact, stated that its usefulness exceeded their expectations.

The location of the seminar at Atlanta University, in Georgia was described by one of the participants as “perfect” in light of the themes which were to be discussed. The university and the city provided both an appropriate environment and relevant resources for the faculty who attended.

The Atlanta University complex has a rich history of contributions to the black community and possesses a repository of special collections concerning black history and the quest for equality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 See Bernstein, Barton J., “Case Law in Plessy v. Ferguson,” Journal of Negro History, Vol. 47 (July 1962), pp. 192198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 347 U.S. 483(1954).

3 Lytle, Clifford M., The Warren Court and Its Critics (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1968), p. 54.Google Scholar

4 Bickel, Alexander M., Politics and the Warren Court (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1965), p. 138.Google Scholar

5 See Dworkin, Ronald, “The Jurisprudence of Richard Nixon,” New York Review of Books, May 4, 1972, pp. 2735.Google Scholar

6 163 U.S. 537 (1896).

7 109 U.S. 3(1883).

8 Boudin, Louis B., “Truth and Fiction About the Fourteenth Amendment,” New York University Law Quarterly Review, Vol. 56 (November 1938), p. 75.Google Scholar

9 Enforcement Act of 1866; Enforcement Act of 1870, amended by Act of February 1871; Anti-Lynching Act of 1871; Civil Rights Act of 1875; The Slave and Kidnapping Act of 1866; The Peonage Abolition Act of 1867.

10 14 Stat. 27 (1866).

11 18 Stat. 335(1875).

12 83 U.S.36 (1873).

13 83 U.S. at 71.

14 109 U.S. 3 (1883).

15 109 U.S. at 11.

16 109 U.S. at 25.

17 109 U.S. at 26.

18 109 U.S. at 62.

19 92 U.S. 214 (1876).

20 95U.S. 485 (1878). 21 133 U.S. 587 (1890).

22 163 U.S. 537 (1896).

23 163 U.S. at 551.

24 163 at 552.

25 163 U.S. at 560.

26 Ibid.

27163 at 562.

28 163 at 560.

29 175 U.S. 528 (1899).

30 305 U.S. 337 (1938).

31 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

32 See Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950) and McLaurin v. Oklahoma, 339 U.S. 637 (1950).