NCMR publishes reviews. Although these pieces are usually commissioned by the reviews editors, if you are interested in submitting a review piece, please contact the relevant reviews editors using the details below.
Books for review should be sent to:
Dr. Sanna Pedersen (spederson@ou.edu)
School of Music
University of Oklahoma
500 W. Boyd
Norman, OK 73019, USA
Recordings for review should be sent to:
Prof. Blake Howe (bhowe@lsu.edu)
CD/DVD Reviews Editor
Nineteenth-Century Music Review
274 M&DA Building
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803-2504, USA
Prof. Heather Platt (hplatt@bsu.edu)
School of Music
Hargreaves Music Building (MU) 203
Ball State University
Muncie, IN 47306, USA
CD or DVD Reviews
Submissions should be sent by email to:
Dr James William Sobaskie
jamessobaskie@gmail.com
Nineteenth-Century Music Review
Department of Music
Mississippi State University
P.O. Box 6240
Mississippi State
MS 39762
USA
Digital Reviews
As well as short reviews of digital resources, NCMR publishes Digital Resource Review Articles.
Digital Resource Review Articles are approximately 5,000 words in length. They consider multiple digital resources or complex issues surrounding the digital humanities, and they may include original research. Prospective authors should contact the Digital Reviews Editor, Heather Platt (hplatt@bsu.edu), before commencing this type of review.
Submissions should be sent by email to:
Prof Heather Platt
hplatt@bsu.edu
School of Music
Ball State University
Muncie
IN 47306
USA
Score Reviews
Scores for review should be sent to:
Dr R. Larry Todd (rltodd@duke.edu)
Duke University,
Department of Music,
Box 90665,
Durham, NC 27708-0665, USA
Submissions should be sent by email to:
Assoc Prof Nancy November
n.november@auckland.ac.nz
School of Music
Building 804 (Fisher Building)
Room 608
18 Waterloo Quadrant
Auckland 1010
New Zealand
As well as commissioning short reviews of recent scores, the Score Reviews Editor will also consider the following contribution types, on a case-by-case basis:
● longer review articles, incorporating a particular theme or focus and recordings/weblinks where appropriate (the emphasis being determined by the item or items up for review);
● reviews that include dialogue between the reviewer and the editor—this could take the form of a brief interview, with Q&A between reviewer and editor, conducted e.g. on Zoom, and recorded for publication along with a written review;
● reviews that encompass scores with non-English prefaces, involving some translation and more explanation those for English editions.
If you would like to work in one of these alternative formats, please contact the Score Reviews Editor to discuss your proposal.