Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T01:50:43.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learn to Think for Yourself: Impelled by UPIC to open new ways of composing*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2013

Rodolphe Bourotte  and
Cyrille Delhaye
Rodolphe Bourotte
Affiliation:
Centre Iannis Xenakis, c/o Groupe de Recherche d'Histoire (GRHIS), UFR Lettres et Sciences Humaines Université de Rouen, Rue Lavoisier, FRANCE–76821 MONT SAINT AIGNAN CEDEX E-mail: rodolphe.bourotte@centre-iannis-xenakis.org; cyrille.delhaye@centre-iannis-xenakis.org
Cyrille Delhaye
Affiliation:
Centre Iannis Xenakis, c/o Groupe de Recherche d'Histoire (GRHIS), UFR Lettres et Sciences Humaines Université de Rouen, Rue Lavoisier, FRANCE–76821 MONT SAINT AIGNAN CEDEX E-mail: rodolphe.bourotte@centre-iannis-xenakis.org; cyrille.delhaye@centre-iannis-xenakis.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Originally designed by Xenakis to free him from traditional music notation while allowing a faithful execution of his musical thought, UPIC (Unité Polyagogique Informatique du CEMAMu) was quickly diverted from its original functions. Even if Xenakis recommended to apprentice composers who came to study with him ‘listen to a lot of music and write’ (Serrou 2003: 20), this machine, since its inception, has enabled a large number of people to access music composition, because it does not require any preliminary theoretical training. Based on this observation we ask how UPIC, capable of converting a drawing into sound in real-time, upset the perception of musical pedagogy not only in Europe but also worldwide, through the many workshops/concerts offered to a wide audience. Exchanges and emulation around this invention are discussed as well.

After describing the technical development of this tool and, by extension, Xenakis's pedagogical thinking, we will highlight some of the most significant encounters between the machine and the public thanks to many unpublished sources found in the archives of the Centre Iannis Xenakis (CIX) recently deposited at the University of Rouen. We will highlight the pedagogical correlation between sound theory, gesture and image involved in the composition of a UPIC score. We will also approach other software applications that combine drawing and sound.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 18 , Special Issue 2: Best Practices in the Pedagogy of Electroacoustic Music and its Technology , August 2013 , pp. 134 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors would like to thank Sharon Kanach for her translation of certain passages. (All translations of French texts are by the authors.)

References

References

Agostini, A., Ghisi, D. 2012. Gestures, Events and Symbols in the Bach Environment. Actes des Journées d'Informatique Musicale (JIM 2012), Mons (Belgium): 247–55.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1987. Huddersfield Contemporary Music Festival Review. Huddersfield Daily Examiner (26 November): 6. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1989. Program Note for the Barbican Centre's French Festival. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Després, A. 1985. Proposition pour la création d'une association chargée de développer l'utilisation et la recherche pédagogique autour de l'UPIC. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Després, A. 1988. Tournée 1988 des Ateliers UPIC, Californie, Mexique, Canada. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Estrada, J. 1980. Rapport sur le groupe des non-voyants. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Fulin, A. 1982. Journal de bord d'une classe maternelle. Les Cahiers de l'ARM 4(30). University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Haswell, R, Hecker, F. 2007. Blackest ever Black. Collapse 3: 109–139.Google Scholar
Jacquemin, G., Coduys, T., Ranc, M. 2012. Iannix 0.8. Actes des Journées d'Informatique Musicale (JIM 2012). Mons (Belgium): 107–15.Google Scholar
Lohner, H. 1986. The UPIC System: A User's Report. Computer Music Journal 4: 42–49.Google Scholar
Lonchampt, J. 1980. Xenakis au Festival de Lille. Le Monde (7 November). University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Lonchampt, J. 1981. L'UPIC aux Halles, de la maternelle à Julio Estrada. Le Monde (21 June). University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Mâche, F.B. 1978. Personal Organizer. Paris: Private archives of François-Bernard Mâche.Google Scholar
Marino, G, Serra, M.-H., Raczinski, J.-M. 1993. The UPIC System: Origins and Innovations. Perspectives of New Music 31(1): 258–269.Google Scholar
Massin, B. 1984. L'empire des sons. Les Nouvelles (14–20 June). University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. 1997. The UPIC System as an Instrument of Learning. Organised Sound 2(1): 35–42.Google Scholar
Pape, G. 1997. Projet artistique des ateliers UPIC. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Serrou, B. 2003. Iannis Xenakis: l'homme des défis. Paris: Cig'art edition.Google Scholar
Thiebault, J.-B. 2008. Drawing Electroacoustic Music. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC 2008). Queen Mary, University of London.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1974. Grandeur et misère de la musique contemporaine. Guide musical 653: 4–6. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1977. Des enfants de cinq ans composeront des symphonies. La Tribune (30 July): 17. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1978. L'homme en question, Xenakis. Télérama (9 September): 14. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1982. Preface. Les Cahiers de l'ARM n°4, Informatique musicale et pédagogie autour de l'UPIC: 3. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1986a. H. Lohner: Interview with Iannis Xenakis. Computer Music Journal 4: 50–55.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1986b. Video documentary produced internally. University of Rouen (France): Archives of Centre Iannis Xenakis.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1992. Formalized Music. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press.Google Scholar
Xenakis, I. 1994. Keleütha (écrits). Paris: l'Arche.Google Scholar

Referenced Software

AlgoScore. 2008. http://kymatica.com/Software/AlgoScore Google Scholar
Artikulator. 2012. http://www.artikulatorapp.com Google Scholar
AudioSculpt. 2012. http://anasynth.ircam.fr/home/software/audiosculpt Google Scholar
bach. 2011. http://www.bachproject.net Google Scholar
Cecilia. 2011. http://code.google.com/p/cecilia4/cec Google Scholar
HighC. 2012. http://highc.org Google Scholar
IanniX. 2012. http://www.iannix.org Google Scholar
Iris. 2012. http://izotope.com/products/audio/iris Google Scholar
Kluppe Timeline (ktl). 2009. http://kluppe.klingt.org Google Scholar
MetaSynth. 2012. http://www.uisoftware.com/MetaSynth Google Scholar
ofxTimeline. 2012. https://github.com/Flightphase/ofxTimeline Google Scholar
OpenTimeLine. 2009. http://dh7.free.fr Google Scholar
ProbaPainter. 2011. http://rodolphebourotte.blogspot.fr/2011/08/proba-painter-demo.html Google Scholar
Singing Fingers. 2012. http://singingfingers.com Google Scholar
SonicPhoto. 2012. http://www.skytopia.com/software/sonicphoto Google Scholar
Spear. 2009. http://www.klingbeil.com/spear Google Scholar
SpectraLayers. 2012. http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/spectralayerspro Google Scholar
TimelinerSA. 2011. http://vvvv.org/documentation/timelinersa Google Scholar