Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T18:59:10.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orphan Sounds: Locating historical recordings in contemporary media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2018

Budhaditya Chattopadhyay
Budhaditya Chattopadhyay*
Affiliation:
Academy of Creative and Performing Arts, Leiden University, Rapenburg 38 2311 EX Leiden, The Netherlands
*
*Email: mail@budhaditya.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article seeks to articulate the interaction between archival sound recordings and the contemporary media, arguing that digitisation and post-digital mediation have led to the interpretation of historical sound recordings as object-disoriented sonic artefacts drifting through the contemporary media environment. Investigating past, current and ongoing sound-based artistic projects and artworks as case studies, the article substantiates the argument by addressing questions of identity, mediation and interpretation in the post-digital condition of contemporary media. These projects are examined in order to gain understanding of how the source materials are often derived from older sounds, such as the pre-electric era early sound recordings made in India on shellacs and cylinders, and how they are reused in artistic production following their re-interpretation as object-disoriented sonic artefacts.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 23 , Special Issue 2: New Wor(l)ds for Old Sounds , August 2018 , pp. 181 - 188
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, W. 1969. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In H. Arendt (ed.) Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Bosma, J. 2014. Post-Digital is Post-Screen: Arnheim’s Visual Thinking Applied to Art in the Expanded Digital Media Field. A Peer-reviewed Journal About Post-Digital Research 3(1). www.aprja.net/post-digital-is-post-screen-arnheims-visual-thinking-applied-to-art-in-the-expanded-digital-media-field/ (accessed 1 May 2018).Google Scholar
Cascone, K. 2002. The Aesthetics of Failure: ‘Post-Digital’ Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal 24(4): 12–18.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, B. 2006. Story of a Forgotten Melody: Restoring the Sound of Bishnupur Gharana. New Delhi: Sarai. www.sarai.net/practices/media-forms/working-questions/audio-booth.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, B. 2011. Eye Contact with the City. London: Touch.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, B. 2013. elegy for Bangalore. Frankfurt: Gruenrekorder.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, B. 2014. Object-Disoriented Sound: Listening in the Post-Digital Condition. A Peer-reviewed Journal About Post-Digital Research 3(1). www.aprja.net/object-disoriented-sound-listening-in-the-post-digital-condition/ (accessed 1 May 2018).Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, B. 2015. Auditory (Con)texts: Writing on Sound. Ear │ Wave │ Event 2. http://earwaveevent.org/article/auditory-contexts-writing-on-sound/ (accessed 1 May 2018).Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, B. 2017. Audible Absence: Searching for the Site in Sound Production. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Chuter, J. 2013. Review: Budhaditya Chattopadhyay – elegy for Bangalore. ATTN: Magazine 19 April. www.attnmagazine.co.uk/music/6482 (accessed 5 May 2018).Google Scholar
Cramer, F. 2014. What is ‘Post-digital’? A Peer-reviewed Journal About Post-Digital Research 3(1). www.aprja.net/what-is-post-digital/ (accessed 1 May 2018).Google Scholar
Ernst, W. 2015. Posting Digital Presence: A Micro-temporal Regime. Keynote lecture at BFX (Bournemouth Visual Effects and Animation) ‘Analogue to Post-digital’, Bournemouth University. https://www.musikundmedien.hu-berlin.de/de/medienwissenschaft/medientheorien/ernst-in-english/pdfs/post-digital-presence-kurz.pdf (accessed 5 May 2018).Google Scholar
Feld, S. 1996. Pygmy POP. A Genealogy of Schizophonic Mimesis. Yearbook for Traditional Music 28: 1–35.Google Scholar
Gluzman, D. 2005. Interview with Daedelus. R4NT, 1 February. http://r4nt.com/article/interview-with-daedelus/ (accessed 5 May 2018).Google Scholar
Jakimowicz, M. 2010. Art Review. Deccan Herald, 10 October. http://budhaditya.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Review-at-Deccan-Herald-2010.pdf (accessed 5 May 2018).Google Scholar
Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A. and Marton, A. 2010. A Theory of Digital Objects. First Monday 15(6).Google Scholar
Katz, M. 2004. Capturing Sound: How Technology Has Changed Music. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Katz, M. 2011. Listening in Cyberspace. In S. Giddings and M. Lister (eds.) The New Media and Technocultures Reader. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lohr, S. 2012. The Age of Big Data. The New York Times, 11 February.Google Scholar
Messaris, P. and Humphryes, L. (eds.) 2007. Digital Media: Transformation in Human Communication. Pieterlen: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Negroponte, N. 1998. Beyond Digital. Wired 6(12). www.wired.com/1998/12/negroponte-55/ (accessed 1 May 2018).Google Scholar
Nyre, L. 2008. Sound Media: From Live Journalism to Music Recording. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Papadomanolaki, M. 2013. Review: Budhaditya Chattopadhyay – elegy for Bangalore. The Field Reporter, 3 October. http://sonicfield.org/2013/10/310/ (accessed 5 May 2018).Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 1994. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
Sexton, J. 2007. Music, Sound and Multimedia. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2003. The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2006a. The Death and Life of Digital Audio. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 31(4): 338–348.Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2006b. The MP3 as Cultural Artefact. New Media and Society 8(5): 825–842.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chattopadhyay sound files

Sound files
Download Chattopadhyay sound files(File)
File 8.7 MB