Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Perceptions of the care received from Australian palliative care services: A caregiver perspective

  • Tanya M. Pidgeon (a1) (a2), Claire E. Johnson (a1) (a2), Leanne Lester (a3), David Currow (a2) (a4), Patsy Yates (a2) (a5), Samuel F. Allingham (a2) (a6), Sonia Bird (a2) (a6) and Kathy Eagar (a2) (a6)...
ABSTRACT Background:

Caregiver satisfaction and experience surveys help health professionals to understand, measure, and improve the quality of care provided for patients and their families.


Our aim was to explore caregiver perceptions of the care received from Australian specialist palliative care services.


Caregivers of patients receiving palliative care in services registered with Australia's Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration were invited to participate in a caregiver survey. The survey included the FAMCARE–2 and four items from the Ongoing Needs Identification: Caregiver Profile questionnaire.


Surveys were completed by 1,592 caregivers from 49 services. Most respondents reported high satisfaction and positive experiences. Caregivers receiving care from community-based palliative care teams were less satisfied with the management of physical symptoms and comfort (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI 95%] = 0.14, 0.59), with patient psychological care (OR = 0.56; CI 95% = 0.32, 0.98), and with family support (OR = 0.52; CI 95% = 0.35, 0.77) than caregivers of patients in an inpatient setting. If aged over 60 years, caregivers were less likely to have their information needs met regarding available support services (OR = 0.98; CI 95% = 0.97, 0.98) and carer payments (OR = 0.99; CI 95% = 0.98, 1.00). Also, caregivers were less likely to receive adequate information about carer payments if located in an outer regional area (OR = 0.41; CI 95% = 0.25, 0.64). With practical training, caregivers receiving care from community services reported inadequate information provision to support them in caring for patients (OR = 0.60; CI 95% = 0.45, 0.81).

Significance of Results:

While our study identified caregivers as having positive and satisfactory experiences across all domains of care, there is room for improvement in the delivery of palliative care across symptom management, as well as patient and caregiver support, especially in community settings. Caregiver surveys can facilitate the identification and evaluation of both patients' and caregivers' experiences, satisfaction, distress, and unmet needs.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Tanya M. Pidgeon, Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Cancer and Palliative Care Research and Evaluation Unit, School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Level 2, M Block, QE11 Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009. E-Mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Aoun , S. Bird , L.J. Kristjanson , (2010). Reliability testing of the FAMCARE–2 scale: Measuring family carer satisfaction with palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 24(7), 674681. Epub ahead of print Jul 9.

K. Brazil , S. Kaasalainen , A. Williams , (2014). A comparison of support needs between rural and urban family caregivers providing palliative care. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 31(1), 1319. Epub ahead of print Jan 22, 2013.

G.L. Carter , T.J. Lewin , L. Gianacas , (2011). Caregiver satisfaction with outpatient oncology services: Utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE–6. Supportive Care in Cancer, 19(4), 565572. Epub ahead of print Mar 28, 2010.

D.C. Currow (2015). Caregivers' three-cornered hats: Their tricornes. Palliative Medicine, 29(6), 485486. Available from

A. Girgis , S. Lambert , C. Johnson , (2013). Physical, psychosocial, relationship, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: A review. Journal of Oncology Practice, 9(4), 197202. Epub ahead of print Dec 4, 2012. Available from

P.L. Hudson , R. Zordan & T. Trauer (2011). Research priorities associated with family caregivers in palliative care: International perspectives. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(4), 397401. Epub ahead of print Mar 4.

M. Navaie-Waliser , P.H. Feldman , D.A. Gould , (2002). When the caregiver needs care: The plight of vulnerable caregivers. American Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 409413. Available from

T. Pidgeon , C.E. Johnson , D. Currow , (2015). A survey of patients' experience of pain and other symptoms while receiving care from palliative care services. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 6(3), 315322. Epub ahead of print Mar 5.

M.W. Rabow , J.M. Hauser & J. Adams (2004). Supporting family caregivers at the end of life: They don't know what they don't know. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 291(4), 483491. Available from

R.A. Ray , O. Fried & D. Lindsay (2014). Palliative care professional education via video conference builds confidence to deliver palliative care in rural and remote locations. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 272. Available from

K.A. Roza , E.J. Lee , D.E. Meier , (2015). A survey of bereaved family members to assess quality of care on a palliative care unit. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18(4), 358365.

J.M. Teno (2002). Palliative care teams. Self-reflection: Past, present, and future. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 23(2), 9495. Available from

L. Wilkes , K. White & L. O'Riordan (2000). Empowerment through information: Supporting rural families of oncology patients in palliative care. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 8(1), 4146.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Palliative & Supportive Care
  • ISSN: 1478-9515
  • EISSN: 1478-9523
  • URL: /core/journals/palliative-and-supportive-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 51 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 353 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 30th March 2017 - 24th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.