Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-l48q4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T21:13:42.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2010

Doug McAdam
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Sidney Tarrow
Affiliation:
Cornell University

Abstract

Why do two cognate literatures—social movements and electoral studies—travel along parallel paths with little conversation between them? And what can be done to connect them in the future? Drawing on their work with the late Charles Tilly on Dynamics of Contention (2001), Doug McAdam and Sidney Tarrow examine two important studies that approach (but do not effect such a linkage), propose a mechanism-based set of linkages between elections and social movements, and apply their approach in a preliminary examination of the relations between the American anti-war movement after 9/11 and the Democratic Party.

Type
Reflections
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James. 2000. “Why did the West Extend the Franchise? Democracy, Inequality, and Growth in Historical Perspective.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (4): 11671199.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1964. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin. 2006. When Movements Matter: The Townsend Plan and the Rise of Social Security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aminzade, Ronald. 1993. Ballots and Barricades: Class Formation and Republican Politics in France, 1830–1871. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aminzade, Ronald., ed. 2001. Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel, Kaase, Max, Allerback, Klaus R., Farah, Barbara, Heunks, Felix, Inglehart, Ronald, Jennings, M. Kent, Klingemann, Hans D., Marsh, Allan, and Rosenmayr, Leopold. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert, Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, and Laurent, Jean. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beissinger, Mark. 2007. “Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions.” Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
Berman, Ari. 2008. “The Dean Legacy.” In The Nation, (February 28). (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080317/berman), accessed December 2009.Google Scholar
Binder, Amy J. 2002. Contentious Curricula. Afrocentrism and Creationism in American Public Schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Blee, Kathleen M., and Currier, Ashley. 2006. “How Local Social Movement Groups Handle a Presidential Election.” Qualitative Sociology 29(3): 261280.Google Scholar
Boulding, Carew Elizabeth. 2010. “NGOs and Political Participation in Weak Democracies: Sub-national Evidence on Protest and Voter Turnout from Bolivia.” Journal of Politics 72(2): 456468.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie, and Wolchik, Sharon. Forthcoming. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Mixed Regimes: Electoral Struggles, US Democracy Assistance and International Diffusion in Post Communist Europe and Eurasia.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Dalton, Russell J., and Scarrow, Susan, eds. 2003. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caren, Neal, Ghoshal, Raj, and Ribas, Vanesa. 2009. “A Social Movement Generation: Trends in Protesting and Petition Signing, 1973–2006.” Presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Hug, Simon. 2009. “Elections and Ethnic Civil Wars”. Presented at the Joint CSCW WG3/GROW-Net Workshop, PRIO, June 11–12.Google Scholar
Cornfield, Michael. 2004. Politics Moves Online: Campaigning and the Internet. New York: Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Cortright, David. 2004. A Peaceful Superpower: The Movement against War in Iraq. Goshen, Indiana: Fourth Freedom Forum.Google Scholar
Dao, James. 2009. “Antiwar Movement Plans an Autumn Campaign Against Politics on Afghanistan.” New York Times (August 30):12.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1986. “Unwanted Children: Political Violence and the Cycle of Protest in Italy.” European Journal of Political Research 14 (5): 607632.Google Scholar
Diani, Mario, and McAdam, Doug, eds. 2003. Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford and New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew, eds. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Givens, Rebecca, Roberts, Kenneth, and Soule, Sarah, eds. 2010. Dynamics of Diffusion in Social Movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack. 2003. State, Parties, and Social Movements. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Roger V. 1993. “Collective Action and Network Structure.” American Sociological Review 58 (2): 182–96.Google Scholar
Gould, Roger V. 1995. Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merrilee. 2004. Despite the Odds: the Contentious Politics of Education Reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guillion, Daniel Q. 2009. “The Influence of Citizens' non-electoral Behavior on Electoral Outcomes: An Analysis of State Representatives.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Convention, Toronto, August 31.Google Scholar
Hadden, Jennifer, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. “The Global Justice Movement in the United States Since Seattle.” In The Global Justice Movement, ed. della Porta, Donatella. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Hanagan, Michael P., Moch, Leslie Page, and Brake, Wayne Te, eds. 1998. Challenging Authority: The Historical Study of Contentious Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael, and Rojas, Fabio. 2007. “Partisans, nonpartisans and the Antiwar Movement in the United States.” American Politics Research 35 (4): 431–64.Google Scholar
Hedström, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard, Eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1987. “Networks in Context: The Flow of Political Information.” American Political Science Review 81 (4): 11971216.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karpf, David. 2009a. “The MoveOn Effect: Disruptive Innovation and the New Generation of American Political Associations.” Providence, RI: Taubman Center, Brown University.Google Scholar
Karpf, David. 2009b. “All the Dogs that Didn't Bark: Understanding the Dearth of Online Conservative Infrastructure.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, ON, September 3–6.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2007. “Social Movements.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Dalton, Russell and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, Giugni, Marco G., and Koopmans, Ruud. 1995. The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis and St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour. 2000. “The Americanization of the European Left.” Journal of Democracy 12 (2): 7487.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1988. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Paulsen, Ronelle. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (3): 640–67.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Su, Yang. 2002. “The War at Home: Antiwar Protests and Congressional Voting, 1965–1973.” American Sociological Review 67 (5): 696721.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. “Scale Shift in Transnational Contention.” In Transnational Protest & Global Activism, eds. della Porta, Donatella and Tarrow, Sidney. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2008. “Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention.” Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 307–31.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Corrigall-Brown, Catherine. 2005. “Coalitions and Political Context: US Movements Against Wars in Iraq.” Mobilization: An International Journal 10 (3): 327344.Google Scholar
Mobilization. 2003. “Book Symposium: Focus on Dynamics of Contention.” Mobilization 8: 107141.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2008. “Constraints and choices: Electoral Participation in Historical perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (1): 430.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Sprague, John. 1986. Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Qualitative Sociology. 2008. “Symposium on Measuring Mechanisms of Contention.” Qualitative Sociology 31 (4): 331–67.Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1970. “The Mobilization of the Periphery: Data on Turnout, Party Membership and Candidate Recruitment in Norway.” In Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development, ed. Rokkan, Stein. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas, and Zinn, Annalisa. 2003. “The Escalation of Self-Determination Movements: From Protest to Violence.” Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Selb, Peter, Kriesi, Hanspeter, Hanggli, Regula, and Marr, Mirko 2009. “Partisan Choices in a Direct-Democratic Campaign.” European Political Science Review 1 (1): 155172.Google Scholar
Streeter, Thomas. 2007. “Introduction: Redefining the Possible.” In Mousepads, Shoe Leather, and Hope: Lessons from the Howard Dean Campaign for the Future of Internet Politics, eds. Teachout, Zephyr and Streeter, Thomas. Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1974. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2009. “State-Building, Contention, and Rights in War: France, 1787–1798 and America, 2001–2009.” Presented to the Centre de Sociologie de l'Organisation, Paris, October.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1979. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2007. Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Vasi, Bogdan Ion, and Strang, David. 2009. “Civil liberty in America: the diffusion of municipal Bill of Rights Resolutions after the Passage of the USA PATRIOT Act.” American Journal of Sociology 116 (6): 16751715.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 1998. “Political Stability and Civil War: Institutions, Commitment, and American Democracy.” In Analytic Narratives, eds. Bates, Robert, Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, and Laurent, Jean. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 148–93.Google Scholar
Woehrle, Lynne M., Coy, Patrick G., and Maney, Gregory M.. 2008. Contesting Patriotism: Culture, Power, and Strategy in the Peace Movement. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman& Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wood, Lesley Ann. 2003. “Breaking the Bank and Taking to the Streets—How Protesters Target Neoliberalism.” Journal of World-Systems Research: Global Tactics, Targets and Networks 10 (1): 70.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N., and Berger, Michael A.. 1978. “Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d'Etat, Insurgency, and Mass Movements.” The American Journal of Sociology 83 (4): 823861.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan S. et al. 2007. Partisan Families: The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar