Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-79b67bcb76-ncjtf Total loading time: 0.232 Render date: 2021-05-13T19:56:57.297Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Before Reagan: The Development of Abortion’s Partisan Divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2019

Abstract

What explains the alignment of antiabortion positions within the Republican party? I explore this development among voters, activists, and elites before 1980. By 1970, antiabortion attitudes among ordinary voters correlated with conservative views on a range of noneconomic issues including civil rights, Vietnam, feminism and, by 1972, with Republican presidential vote choice. These attitudes predated the parties taking divergent abortion positions. I argue that because racial conservatives and military hawks entered the Republican coalition before abortion became politically activated, issue overlap among ordinary voters incentivized Republicans to oppose abortion rights once the issue gained salience. Likewise, because proabortion voters generally supported civil rights, once the GOP adopted a Southern strategy, this predisposed pro-choice groups to align with the Democratic party. A core argument is that preexisting public opinion enabled activist leaders to embed the anti (pro) abortion movement in a web of conservative (liberal) causes. A key finding is that the white evangelical laity’s support for conservative abortion policies preceded the political mobilization of evangelical leaders into the pro-life movement. I contend the pro-life movement’s alignment with conservatism and the Republican party was less contingent on elite bargaining, and more rooted in the mass public, than existing scholarship suggests.

Type
Special Section: The Glass Ceiling/Gender
Copyright
© American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HSAXKU

I would like to thank Rob Van Houweling, Gabe Lenz, Eric Schickler, and Joseph Warren for reading and commenting on drafts of this manuscript. I have benefited from helpful discussions on various aspects of abortion politics with Thea Rossi Barron, Terri Bimes, Jim Guth, Richard Doerflinger, Stuart Eizenstat, Elizabeth Herman, Jonathan Ladd, Geoffrey Layman, Connie Marshner, Hans Noel, Justin Phillips, Dan Schlozman, and Laura Stoker. My thanks go to seminar participants at UC Berkeley and the 2019 meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, especially Laura Olson, for their feedback. I also appreciate the very helpful comments from four anonymous reviewers. Finally, support from the Synar Graduate Research Fellowship at UC Berkeley made travel to various archives possible.

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 1995. “It’s Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 57(1): 176–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Greg. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammerman, Nancy. 1990. Baptist Battles: Social Change and Religious Conflict in the Southern Baptist Convention. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Balmer, Randall. 2006. Thy Kingdom Come: How the Religious Right Distorts the Faith and Threatens America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans and Zaller, John. 2002. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Adam. 2010. “James J. Kilpatrick, Conservative Commentator, Dies.” Washington Post, August 16.Google Scholar
Buckley, William F. 1966. “The Catholic Church and Abortion.” National Review, April 5.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward and Stimson, James. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Matthew, Gamm, Gerald and Phillips, Justin. 2016. “Origins of the Culture War: Social Issues in State Party Platforms, 1960–2014.” Paper resented at the American Political Science Association. http://www.columbia.edu/∼jhp2121/workingpapers/CultureWar.pdf.Google Scholar
Carsey, Thomas and Layman, Geoffrey. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Political Science Review 50(2): 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, Devin, Dunham, James and Warshaw, Christopher. 2018. “The Ideological Nationalization of Partisan Subconstituencies in the American States.” Public Choice 176(1–2): 133–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Anthony, Mickey, Robert and Van Houweling, Robert. 2008. “Explaining the Contemporary Alignment of Race and Party: Evidence from California’s 1946 Ballot Initiative on Fair Employment.” Studies in American Political Development 22(2): 204– 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 2006 (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Critical Review 18(1–3): 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth A., Jelen, Ted and Wilcox., Clyde 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Critchlow, Donald. 1999. Intended Consequences: Birth Control, Abortion, and the Federal Government in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douthat, Ross, 2009. “A Different Kind of Liberal.” New York Times, August 30.Google Scholar
Eizenstat, Stuart. Interview with Author. August 31, 2018.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles and Kosaki, Liane. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83(3): 751–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, Jo. 1975. The Politics of Women’s Liberation. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Friedan, Betty. 1976. It Changed My Life: Writings on the Women’s Movement. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul. 2010. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Granberg, Donald. 1981. “The Abortion Activists.” Family Planning Perspectives 13(4): 157–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhouse, Linda and Siegel, Reva. 2012. Before Roe v. Wade: Voices that Shaped the Abortion Debate before the Supreme Court’s Ruling. Public Law Working Paper No. 257. New Haven, CT: Yale University Law School.Google Scholar
Karol, David. 2009. Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killian, Mitchell and Wilcox, Clyde. 2008. “Do Abortion Attitudes Lead to Party Switching?Politics Research Quarterly 61(4): 561–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpatrick, James. 1976. “Abortion Said Poor Issue in Campaign.” Washington Star, September 18.Google Scholar
Klemesrud, Judy. 1976. “Abortion in the Campaign: Methodist Surgeon Leads the Opposition.” New York Times, March 1.Google Scholar
Kotlowski, Dean J. 2001. Nixon’s Civil Rights: Politics, Principle, and Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey and Carsey, Thomas. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Political Science Review 46(4): 786802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas, Green, John, Herrera, Richard and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104(2): 324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshner, Connie. Interview with Author. June 19, 2018.Google Scholar
Martin, William. 1996. With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America. New York: Broadway.Google Scholar
Masket, Seth. 2017. “Deciding the Democratic Party’s Direction.” Vox, September 12.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Colman. 1980. “Some Who Oppose Abortion Now Question One-Issue Politics.” LA Times, January 2.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan and Schickler, Eric. 2018. “On the Theory of Parties.” Annual Review of Political Science 21: 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Eric. 2008. Politics in the Pews: The Political Mobilization of Black Churches. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Review . 1982. “Catholic Bishops: A Big Problem.” December 10, p. 1526.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perlstein, Rick. 2008. Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Phillips, Kevin. 1969. The Emerging Republican Majority. New York: Arlington House.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rusher, William A. 1975. The Making of the New Majority Party. New York: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Democrats, Republicans and the Politics of Women’s Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Frank. 2007. Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back. Philadelphia: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2016. Racial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 1932– 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Daniel. 2015. When Movements Anchor Parties: Electoral Alignments in Political History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1991. The Pro-Choice Movement Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde. 1992. God’s Warriors: The Christian Right in Twentieth-Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Daniel. 2011. “The GOP’s Abortion Strategy: Why Pro-Choice Republicans Became Pro-Life in the 1970s.” Journal of Policy History 23(4): 513–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Daniel. 2016. Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. Wade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change . Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa. 2000. Feminists and Party Politics. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 2012. “What Nature and Origins Leaves Out.” Critical Review 24(4): 569642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Mary. 2015. After Roe: The Lost History of the Abortion Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

O’Brian Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

O’Brian supplementary material

Appendix

Download O’Brian supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 329 KB

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Before Reagan: The Development of Abortion’s Partisan Divide
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Before Reagan: The Development of Abortion’s Partisan Divide
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Before Reagan: The Development of Abortion’s Partisan Divide
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *