Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-9wdfl Total loading time: 0.629 Render date: 2022-01-23T16:39:07.323Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Beyond Democracy-Dictatorship Measures: A New Framework Capturing Executive Bases of Power, 1789–2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2019

Abstract

We attempt to integrate the literatures on authoritarian regime types and democratic forms of government. We propose a theoretical framework of five dimensions of executive appointment and dismissal that can be applied in both more democratic and more authoritarian regimes: the hereditary, military, ruling party, direct election, and confidence dimensions, respectively. Relying on the Varieties of Democracy data, we provide measures of these five dimensions for 3,937 individual heads of state and 2,874 heads of government from 192 countries across the globe from 1789 to the present. After presenting descriptive evidence of their prevalence, variation, and relationship to extant regime typologies, a set of exploratory probes gauge the extent to which the five dimensions can predict levels of repression, corruption, and executive survival, controlling for aspects of democracy. This leads to generation of a set of original hypotheses that we hope can serve as building blocks for explanatory theory. We conclude by discussing some limitations of these novel data.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/1KYJ3N

A list of permanent links to Supplementary Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

The authors would like to thank Per Andersson, Thomas Brambor, John Gerring, Jennifer Gandhi, Karl Henrik Knutsen, Johannes Lindvall, Anna Lührman, Katherine Michel, Andreas Schedler, and four anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Invaluable research assistance in collecting the V-Dem data on executives was provided by Vlad Ciobanu, Talib Jabbar, and Swaantje Marten. This research project was supported by Swedish Research Council Grant 421-2014-1283; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond Program Grant M13-0559:1; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond Program Grant M14-0087:1; Knut and Alice Wallenberg Academy Fellow Staffan I. Lindberg, Grant 2013.0166; and internal grants from the Vice-Chancellor’s office, the Dean of the College of Social Sciences, and the Department of Political Science at University of Gothenburg.

References

Baturo, Alexander. 2014. Democracy, Dictatorship, and Term Limits . Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.10.3998/mpub.4772634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondel, Jean. 1984. “Dual Leadership in the Contemporary World: A Step toward Regime Stability?” In Comparative Government and Politics: Essays on Honor of S. E. Finer, ed. Kavanagh, D. and Peele, G.. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles and Svolik, Milan. 2013. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships.” Journal of Democracy 75(2): 300–16.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. “Hereditary Successions in Modern Autocracies.” World Politics 59(4): 595628.10.1353/wp.2008.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph, and Morrow, James. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4292.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charron, Nicholas and Lapuente, Victor. 2011. “Which Dictators Provide Quality of Government?Studies in Comparative International Development 46(4): 397423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2010. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143(1-2): 67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David and Adcock, Robert. 1999. “Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 537–65.10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Steven Fish, M., Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Krusell, Joshua, Lührmann, Anna, Marquardt, Kyle L., McMann, Kelly, Mechkova, Valeriya, Olin, Moa, Paxton, Pamela, Pemstein, Daniel, Pernes, Josefine, Sanhueza Petrarca, Constanza, von Römer, Johannes, Saxer, Laura, Seim, Brigitte, Sigman, Rachel, Staton, Jeffrey, Stepanova, Natalia, and Wilson, Steven. 2017a. “V- Dem Country-Year Dataset v7.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Altman, David, Bernhard, Michael, Steven Fish, M., Glynn, Adam, Hicken, Allen, Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Marquardt, Kyle L., Saxer, Laura, McMann, Kelly, Mechkova, Valeriya, Paxton, Pamela, Pemstein, Daniel, Seim, Brigitte, Sigman, Rachel, and Staton, Jeffrey. 2017b. “V-Dem Codebook v7.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Gerring, John, Lindberg, Staffan I., Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Teorell, Jan, Krusell, Joshua, Marquardt, Kyle L., Mechkova, Valeriya, Pemstein, Daniel, Pernes, Josefine, Saxer, Laura, Stepanova, Natalia, Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, and Wilson, Steven. 2017c. “V-Dem Methodology v7.” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2002. “Thinking about Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 2135.10.1353/jod.2002.0025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1980. “A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government.” European Journal of Political Research 8: 165–87.Google Scholar
Elgie, Robert. 1998. “The Classification of democratic Regime Types: Conceptual Ambiguity and Contestable Assumptions.” European Journal of Political Research 33: 219–38.Google Scholar
Elgie, Robert, ed. 1999. “The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism.” In Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Elgie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198293860.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, Samuel. 1962. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. London & Dunmow: Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40(11): 1279–30110.1177/0010414007305817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics . Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.10.3998/mpub.11910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, Wright, Joseph, and Frantz, Erica. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Dataset.” Perspectives on Politics 12(2): 313–31.10.1017/S1537592714000851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, Thacker, Strom, and Moreno, Carola. 2009. “Are Parliamentary Systems Better?Comparative Political Studies 42(3): 327–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Henk, Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009. “Introducing Archigos: A Dataset of Political Leaders.” Journal of Peace Research 46(29): 269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadenius, Axel and Teorell, Jan. 2007. “Pathways from Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 18(1): 143–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Henry. 2014. “The Informal Politics of Formal Constitutions: Rethinking the Effects of ‘Presidentialism’ and ‘Parliamentarism’ in the Cases of Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, and Ukraine,” In Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Ginsburg, T. and Simpser, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herb, Michael. 1999. All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Huber, J. 1996. ”The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 90(2): 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross-National Survey. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Kailitz, Steffen. 2013. “Classifying Political Regimes Revisited: Legitimation and Durability.” Democratization 20(1): 3960.10.1080/13510347.2013.738861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, Carl Henrik, Teorell, Jan, Cornell, Agnes, Gerring, John, Gjerløw, Haakon, Skaaning, Svend-Erik, Wig, Tore, Ziblatt, Daniel, Marquardt, Kyle, Pemstein, Dan, and Seim, Brigitte. 2017. “Introducing the Historical Varieties of Democracy Dataset: Patterns and Determinants of Democratization in the Long 19th Century.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Kokkonen, Andrej and Sundell, Anders. 2014. “Delivering Stability: Primogeniture and Autocratic Survival in European Monarchies.” American Political Science Review 108(2): 438–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter. 2000. “The Constitutional Economics of Autocratic Succession.” Public Choice 103(1-2): 6384.10.1023/A:1005078532251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steve and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries . New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w2tCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. 2009. Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition . Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1990a. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1(1): 5169.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1990b. “The Virtues of Parliamentarism.” Journal of Democracy 1(4): 8491.10.1353/jod.1990.0059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londregan, John and Poole, Keith. 1990. “Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power.” World Politics 42(2): 151–83.10.2307/2010462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2009. “Legislative Elections in Hegemonic Authoritarian Regimes.” In Democratization by Elections, ed. Lindberg, Staffan I.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McMann, Kelly, Pemstein, Daniel, Seim, Brigitte, Teorell, Jan, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2016. “Strategies of Validation: Assessing the Varieties of Democracy Corruption Data”, V-Dem Working Paper Series 2016: 23, The Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2005. “Ten Fallacies about Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Methods 3(1): 25.Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric. 1977. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2008. Driving Democracy: Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Marquardt, Kyle L., Tzelgov, Eitan, Wang, Yi-ting, Krusell, Joshua, and Miri, Farhad. 2017. “The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data.” V-Dem Institute Working Paper Series 2015: 21. The Varieties of Democracy Institute, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Persson, Anna, Rothstein, Bo, and Teorell, Jan. 2013. “Why Anticorruption Reform Fails: Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem.” Governance 26(3): 449–71.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Roland, Gérard, and Tabellini, Guido. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 310–27.10.1162/003355300555457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Tortsen and Tabellini, Guido. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2591.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Jonathan and Thyne, Clayton. 2011. “Global Instances of Coups from 1950 to 2010: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 48(2): 249–59.Google Scholar
Roberts, Tyson. 2015. “The Durability of Presidential and Parliament-Based Dictatorships.” Comparative Political Studies 48(7): 915–48.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. 2d ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-25217-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, ed. 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder & London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, ed. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Mathew Søberg. 2009. “Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations.” The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Mathew Soberg and Carey, John. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siaroff, Alan. 2003. “Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction.” European Journal of Political Research 42: 287312.10.1111/1475-6765.00084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siaroff, Alan. 2013. Comparing Political Regimes: A Thematic Introduction to Comparative Politics. Toronto. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred and Skach, Cindy. 1993. “Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation.” World Politics 46(1): 122.10.2307/2950664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139176040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, Jan, Coppedge, Michael, Lindberg, Staffan, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2018. “Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe.” Studies in Comparative International Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-018-9268-z.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1987. Autocracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-7741-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahman, Michael, Teorell, Jan and Hadenius, Axel. 2013. “Authoritarian Regime Types Revisited: Updated Data in a Comparative Perspective.” Contemporary Politics 19(1): 1934.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Teorell and Lindberg Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: File

Teorell and Lindberg supplementary material

Appendices A-H

Download Teorell and Lindberg supplementary material(File)
File 6 MB
7
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Beyond Democracy-Dictatorship Measures: A New Framework Capturing Executive Bases of Power, 1789–2016
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Beyond Democracy-Dictatorship Measures: A New Framework Capturing Executive Bases of Power, 1789–2016
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Beyond Democracy-Dictatorship Measures: A New Framework Capturing Executive Bases of Power, 1789–2016
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *