Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparing America: Reflections on Democracy across Subfields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2019

Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Is America in a period of democratic decline? I argue that there is an urgent need to consider the United States in comparative perspective, and that doing so is necessary to contextualize and understand the quality of American democracy. I describe two approaches to comparing the United States: the first shows how the United States stacks up to other countries, while the second uses the theories and tools of comparative politics to examine relationships between institutions, actors, and democratic outcomes. I then draw on research in three literatures—clientelism and corruption, capitalism and redistribution, and race and ethnic politics and American Political Development—to lay out a research agenda for closing the gap between the subfields of American and comparative politics. In doing so, I also argue for richer engagement between academics and the public sphere, as opportunities for scholars to provide commentary and analysis about contemporary politics continue to expand.

Type
Reflection
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. 2009. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acharya, Avidit, Blackwell, Matthew, and Sen, Maya. 2018. Deep Roots: How Slavery Still Shapes Southern Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Albertus, Michael and Menaldo, Victor. 2018. “Why Are So Many Democracies Breaking Down?New York Times, May 8. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opinion/democracy-authoritarian-constitutions.html.Google Scholar
Albright, Madeleine. 2018. Fascism: A Warning . New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Amberg, Stephen. 2017. “Constructing Industrial Order in the Center of the American Economy: How Electoral Competition and Social Collaboration Evolved in Twentieth-Century New York.” Studies in American Political Development 31(1): 108–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arriola, Leonardo. 2012. Multi-Ethnic Coalitions in Africa: Business Financing of Opposition Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azari, Julia. 2018. “Forget Norms. Our Democracy Depends on Values.” FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved June 5, 2018 (https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/forget-norms-our-democracy-depends-on-values/).Google Scholar
Banfield, Edward and Wilson, James Q.. 1963. City Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, David Alexander. 2018. Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Leech, Beth L., Kimball, David C.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands, and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspective on Politics 10(3): 571–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Fred. 2014. “Democratizing Finance.” Politics & Society 42(1): 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright Line Watch Survey Reports. 2018. http://brightlinewatch.org.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea and Morgan, Kimberley J.. 2011. The Delegated Welfare State? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2013. Making Capitalism Fit for Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2015. “Structural Power and Political Science in the Post-Crisis Era.” Business and Politics 17(3): 391409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. 1971. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2015. “Facing up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiIulio, John J. 2014. Bring Back the Bureaucrats: Why More Federal Workers Will Lead to Better (and Smaller!) Government. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drutman, Lee, Diamond, Larry, and Goldman, Joe. 2018. “Follow the Leader: Exploring American Support for Democracy and Authoritarianism.” Democracy Fund Voter Study Group. (https://www.voterstudygroup.org/publications/2017-voter-survey/follow-the-leader).Google Scholar
Eckhouse, Laurel. 2018. “White Riot: Race, Institutions, and the 2016 U.S. Election.Politics, Groups, and Identities. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1442725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2018. “Democracy Continues Its Disturbing Retreat.” https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/01/31/democracy-continues-its-disturbing-retreat.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry. 2018. The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Electoral Integrity Project. “The 2014 and 2016 PEI-US.” https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/pei-us-2016/.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Francis, Megan Ming. 2014. Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2018. “Freedom in the World 2018.” https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2018/united-states.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1952. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward L. 2012. Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin and Page, Benjamin. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam and Min, Brian. 2013. “Distributive Politics around the World.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 7399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob and Pierson, Paul, 2011. Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer – and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and David Soskice, , eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert. 2016. “Democratization during the Third Wave.” The Annual Review of Political Science 19: 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, David. 2004. “‘Business’ Is Not an Interest Group: On the Study of Companies in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 4769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1964. The Founding of New Societies. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics 50(2): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 2007. The Welfare State Nobody Knows: Debunking Myths about U.S. Social Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2009. “Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow of the Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 61(3): 438–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto and Krupenkin, Masha. 2019. “The Strengthening of Partisan Affect.” Advances in Political Psychology 39: 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kimberley. 2010. Reforming Jim Crow: Southern Politics and State in the Age before Brown . New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusko, Karen. 2017. Who Speaks for the Poor? Electoral Geography, Party Entry, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalb, Johanna and Kuo, Didi. 2018. “Reassessing American Democracy: The Enduring Challenge of Racial Exclusion.” University of Michigan Law Review Online 117: 5162.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2013. Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, A Division of W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Keller, Eric and Kelly, Nathan J.. 2015. “Partisan Politics, Financial Deregulation, and the New Gilded Age.” Political Research Quarterly 68(3): 428–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Desmond S. and Lieberman., Robert C. 2009. “Ironies of State Building.” World Politics 61(3): 547–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Desmond S. and Smith, Rogers M.. 2005. “Racial Orders in American Political Development.” American Political Science Review 99(1): 7592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippner, Greta. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Didi. 2018. Clientelism, Capitalism, and Democracy: The Rise of Programmatic Politics in the United States and Britain. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, Robert. 2018. Can Democracy Survive Global Capitalism? New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Whittlesey House.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert, Mettler, Suzanne, Pepinsky, Thomas B., Roberts, Kenneth M., and Valelly, Richard. 2018. “The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 17(2): 470–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Brink and Teles, Steven. 2017. The Captured Economy: How the Powerful Enrich Themselves, Slow Down Growth, and Increase Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. and Stepan., Alfred 2011. “Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 9(4): 841–56.Google Scholar
Lynch, Julia. 2006. Age in the Welfare State: The Origins of Social Spending on Pensioners, Workers, and Children. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Julia. 2014. “A Cross-National Perspective on the American Welfare State.” In Oxford Handbook of U.S. Social Policy , ed. Beland, Daniel, Morgan, Kimberley J., and Howard, Christopher, 112–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2003. The Politics of Social Risk: Business and Welfare State Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie J. and Swank, Duane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Liliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Anthony. 1998. Making Race and Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches, 2nd ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2018. The Government-Citizen Disconnect. New York: Russell Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, Jamila. 2018. Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickey, Robert. 2015. Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America’s Deep South, 1944–1972. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branco. 2016. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizruchi, Mark. 2013. The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kimberley. 2014. “Comparative Politics and American Political Development.The Oxford Handbook of American Political Development, ed. Valelly, Richard, Mettler, Suzanne, and Lieberman, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2018. “When the President Takes On Amazon, Nobody Wins.” New York Times, May 18. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/18/business/trump-amazon-economy.html.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2018. “Status Threat, not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(19): E4330E4339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718155115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, William. 2008. “The Myth of the ‘Weak’ American State.” American Historical Review 113(3): 752–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, Nathan. and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2011. “The Slave Trade and the Origins of Mistrust in Africa.” American Economic Review 101(7): 3221–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OpenSecrets.org. 2018. “All the President’s Profiting.” (https://www.opensecrets.org/trump/trump-properties?cycle=All).Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin, Bartels, Larry, and Seawright, Jason. 2013. “Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans.” Perspectives on Politics 11(1): 5173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Tom. 2018. “On American Exceptionalism and Its Colonial Past.” Retrieved June 5, 2018. https://tompepinsky.com/2018/04/16/on-american-exceptionalism-and-its-colonial-past/.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, Daniel. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, Monica. 2016. “American Exceptionalism and the Welfare State: The Revisionist Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 187203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Wallerstein, Michael. 1988. “Structural Dependence of the State on Capital.” American Political Science Review 82(1): 1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, Jonathan and Diego-Rosell, Pablo. 2017. “Explaining Nationalist Political Views: The Case of Donald Trump.” DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2822059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth and Stasavage, David. 2017. “Wealth Inequality and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 451–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenman, Roger. 2015. Networks and Institutions in Europe’s Emerging Markets. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Scott, James. 1969. “Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change.” American Political Science Review 63(4): 1142–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1977. “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and Italy.” Politics & Society 7(1): 403–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberman, Bernard. 1993. Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Alexander Hertel-Fernandez, . 2016. “The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism.” Perspectives on Politics 14(3): 681–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Timothy. 2017. On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century . London: The Bodley Head.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe and Weaver, Vesla. 2017. “Police Are Our Government: Politics, Political Science, and the Policing of Race-Class Subjugated Communities.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 565–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suskind, Ron. 2004. “Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush.New York Times Magazine, October 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/faith-certainty-and-the-presidency-of-george-w-bush.html.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 2002. Capitalists against Markets: The Making of Labor Markets and Welfare States in the United States and Sweden. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teele, Dawn. 2018. Forging the Franchise: The Political Origins of the Women’s Vote. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Thurston, Chloe. 2018. At the Boundaries of Homeownership: Credit, Discrimination, and the American State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valelly, Richard M. 2004. The Two Reconstructions: The Struggle for Black Enfranchisement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 1987. “Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom.” British Journal of Political Science 17(4): 385408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2008. “Does Landholding Inequality Block Democratization? A Test Case of the ‘Bread and Democracy’ Thesis and the Case of Prussia.” World Politics 60(4): 610–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel and Capoccia, Giovanni. 2010. “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond.” Comparative Political Studies 43(8/9): 931–68.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 61
Total number of PDF views: 398 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st August 2019 - 18th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-vchrx Total loading time: 0.293 Render date: 2021-01-18T23:24:07.792Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Mon Jan 18 2021 22:56:06 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Comparing America: Reflections on Democracy across Subfields
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Comparing America: Reflections on Democracy across Subfields
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Comparing America: Reflections on Democracy across Subfields
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *