Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gblv7 Total loading time: 0.871 Render date: 2022-05-20T05:25:21.047Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Creative Learning and Policy Ideas: The Global Rise of Green Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2021

Abstract

Ideas play an important role in policy change. Theories of policy change, including rational and bounded learning, bracket what needs to be explained: the creation of new ideas. We develop a theory of creative learning in international organizations (IOs). It posits that IO officials respond to new problems and state practices by creating novel concepts and policy ideas. New ideas help officials to manage multiple pressures in their organization’s strategic situation. They enable officials to mediate principal demands while seeking to mobilize client states. We theorize three modes of creative learning that generate new ideas: conceptual combination, translation, and repurposing. Empirically, we explain a major change in global environmental policy: the rise of green growth ideas among major IOs, including the OECD, the UN, and the World Bank. Green growth ideas include new arguments drawn from Keynesian and Schumpeterian economics, which claim that environmental policies can drive economic growth. We show how these ideas were a creative response to the problem of climate change and emerging state interventions in support of clean energy. Our theory of creative learning applies beyond IOs to domestic politics and takes on added significance in times of transformative change that challenge the scripts of policymaking.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A list of permanent links to Supplemental Materials provided by the authors precedes the References section.

Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AE0MKQ

References

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., and Hemous, D.. 2012. “The Environment and Directed Technical Change.” American Economic Review 102(1): 131–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acemoglu, D., Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., and Kerr, W.. 2016. “Transition to Clean Technology.” Journal of Political Economy 124(1): 52104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2019. World Ordering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, Teresa M. 1988. “A Model of Creativity in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 10:123–67.Google Scholar
Andonova, Liliana B. 2017. Governance Entrepreneurs: International Organizations and the Rise of Global Public-Private Partnerships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Coleman, Liv. 2005. “Designing Police: Interpol and the Study of Change in International Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 49(4): 593619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J., and Howlett, M.. 1992: “The Lessons of Learning: Reconciling Theories of Policy Learning and Policy Change.” Policy Sciences 25:275–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Tobias, and Esguerra, Alejandro. 2017. “Introduction: The Objects of Translation.” In World Politics in Translation, ed. Berger, Tobias and Esguerra, Alejandro 1738. Abindgon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, Gerald, and Galvan, Dennis. 2009. “How People Experience and Change Institutions.” Theory and Society 38(6): 543–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, Gerald, Galvan, Dennis C., and Hattam, Victoria, eds. 2013. Political Creativity: Reconfiguring Institutional Order and Change. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2013. “Global Environmental Norms.” In Handbook of Global Climate and Environmental Policy, ed. Falkner, R. 127145. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxekjær, Lau. 2015. “Korea as Green Middle Power.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 16(3): 443–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Alex, and Fankhauser, Simon. 2011. “The Green Growth Narrative: Paradigm Shift or Just Spin?Global Environmental Change 21(4): 1157–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Alex, and Stern, Nicholas. 2010. “Environmental Policy and the Economic Downturn.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26(2): 137–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandon, Carter J. 2018. Lead Economist, Environment and Natural Resources Global Practice, World Bank. Interview by author, April 6.Google Scholar
Breznitz, D., and Ornston, D.. 2013. “The Revolutionary Power of Peripheral Agencies.” Comparative Political Studies 46(10): 1219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Búzás, Zoltán I., and Graham, Erin R.. 2020. “Emergent Flexibility in Institutional Development: How International Rules Really Change.” International Studies Quarterly 64(4): 821–33. (https://doi-org.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/10.1093/isq/sqaa049).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Ambassador Rae Kwon. 2018. Director (2004–2008), Environment and Sustainable Development Division, UNESCAP. Interview by author, June 12.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, Jeffrey M. 2010. Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornut, Jérémie. 2017. “Diplomacy, Agency, and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice.” European Journal of International Relations 24(3): 712–36. DOI:1354066117725156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, Z., and Simmons, B.. 2004. ”On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework.” Annals of the American Academy 598(1): 3351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Quiggin, John. 2017. “Consensus, Dissensus, and Economic Ideas: Economic Crisis and the Rise and Fall of Keynesianism.” Interational Studies Quarterly 61(2): 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, Marianne. 2017. Chief Economist, Sustainable Development Vice Presidency, World Bank. Interview by author, October 17.Google Scholar
Gadinger, Frank. 2016. “On Justification and Critique: Luc Boltanski’s Pragmatic Sociology and International Relations.” International Political Sociology 10:187205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2010. “Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 650–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girouard, Nathalie. 2018. Head of Division, Environment Directorate, OECD. Interview by author, May 25.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2009. “Brokering Change: Networks and Entrepreneurs in International Politics.” International Theory 1(2): 249–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouvello, Christophe de. 2018. Senior Energy and Climate Change Specialist, World Bank. Interview with author, February 14.Google Scholar
Graham, Erin R. 2015. “Money and Multilateralism: How Funding Rules Constitute IO Governance.” International Theory 7(1): 162–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1982. “Words Can Hurt You; or, Who Said What to Whom about Regimes.” International Organization 36(2): 207–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons. Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone.” International Organization 46(1): 187224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, and Pollack, Mark A.. 2002. “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 8(3): 339–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25(3): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallegatte, Stephane, Heal, Geoffrey, Fay, Marianne, and Treguer, David. 2011. “From Growth to Green Growth: A Framework.” Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 5872. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Han, Heejin. 2015. “Korea’s Pursuit of Low-Carbon Green Growth.” Pacific Review 28(5): 731–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, , , Darren G. Lake, David A. Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., eds. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan. 1998. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Herrigel, Gary. 2010. Manufacturing Possibilities: Creative Action and Industrial Recomposition in the United States, Germany, and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 2018. “Change in International Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 24(3): 687711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). 2005. The Fifth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Development in Asia and the Pacific, March 26. Environmental Negotiations Bulletin. (http://enb.iisd.org/crs/mced/).Google Scholar
International Trade Centre. 2014. Trade in Environmental Goods and Services. Geneva: International Trade Centre.Google Scholar
Interview 1. 2017. Anonymous. Interview by author, September 5.Google Scholar
Interview 24. 2018. Anonymous. Interview by author, April 24.Google Scholar
Interview 26. 2018. Anonymous. Interview by author, May 1.Google Scholar
Interview 27. 2018. Anonymous. Interview by author, May 2.Google Scholar
Jabko, Nicolas. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Michael. 2013. “Green Growth.” In Handbook of Global Climate and Environmental Policy, ed. Falkner, R., 197214. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Trans. Jeremy Gaines and Paul Keast. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kalyanpur, Nikhil, and Newman, Abraham. 2017. “Form over Function in Finance: International Institutional Design by Bricolage.” Review of International Political Economy 24(3): 363–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenett, Yoed N., Anaki, David, and Faust, Miriam. 2014. “Investigating the Structure of Semantic Networks in Low and High Creative Persons.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitamori, Kumi. 2018. Head of Division, Green Growth and Global Relations, Environment Directorate, OECD. Interview by author, May 31.Google Scholar
Levinthal, Daniel A., and March, James G.. 1993. “The Myopia of Learning.” Strategic Management Journal 14: 95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lvovsky, Kseniya. 2017. Former Leader of Climate Change Team, World Bank. Interview by author, October 26.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, Chrysostomos, North, Douglass C., and Shariq, Syed. 2004. “Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance ." Perspectives on Politics 2(1): 7584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society, ed., Morris, Charles W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, James, and Fiorino, Daniel J.. 2017. Conceptual Innovation in Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckling, Jonas. 2011. Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckling, Jonas. 2018. “The Developmental State in Global Regulation: Economic Change and Climate Policy.” European Journal of International Relations 24(1): 5881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckling, Jonas, and Allan, Bentley B.. 2020. “The Evolution of Ideas in Global Climate Policy.” Nature Climate Change 10:434–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0739-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2005. “Policy Learning, Policy Diffusion, and the Making of a New Order.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1): 6782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahm, Jonas. 2017. “Renewable Futures and Industrial Legacies: Wind and Solar Sectors in China, Germany, and the United States.” Business and Politics 19(1): 68106.Google Scholar
Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J.. 2003. “Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform.” International Organization 57(2): 241–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolova, Aneta. 2018. Environmental Affairs Officer, UNESCAP. Interview by author, July 16.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2012. “The Coalition Merchants: The Ideological Roots of the Civil Rights Realignment.” Journal of Politics 74(1): 156–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2006. Annual Report on Sustainable Development Work in the OECD. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2007. OECD Contributions to the United Nations Commision on Sustainable Development 15: Energy for Sustainable Development. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2009a. Declaration on Green Growth Adopted at the Meeting of the Council at Ministerial Level on 25 June 2009. C/MIN(2009)5/ADD1/FINAL.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2009b. Green Growth: Overcoming the Crisis and Beyond. OECD: Paris.Google Scholar
OECD official. 2017. Senior Official in the Environment Directorate. Interview by author, December 22.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines.” International Organization 52(3): 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REN21. 2007. Renewables 2007: Global Status Report. Paris: Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2014. “Green Industrial Policy.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30(3): 469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul. 1988. “An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein .” Policy Sciences 21(2): 129–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. Keith. 2012. Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation, Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Sebastian. 2014Foreign Military Presence and the Changing Practice of Sovereignty.” American Political Science Review 108(4): 817–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob. 2015. The Politics of Expertise: Competing for Authority in Global Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seybert, Lucia A., and Katzenstein, Peter J.. 2018. “Protean Power and Control Power: Conceptual Analysis.” In Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics, ed. Katzenstein, Peter J. and Seybert, Lucia A. 326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, Fulai. 2018. Head, Economic and Fiscal Policy Unit, Resources and Markets Branch, UNEP. Interview by author, February 12.Google Scholar
Shipan, C. R., and Volden, C.. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–57.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization.” American Political Science Review 98(1): 171–89.Google Scholar
Simmons, , , Beth A. Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey, eds. 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert M. 1974. “The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics.” In Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics, ed. Gopalakrishnan, Chennat, 257276. (https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230523210#about).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerer, Thomas, and Tallberg, Jonas. 2019. “Diffusion Across International Organizations: Connectivity and Convergence.” International Organization 73(2): 399433. doi:10.1017/S0020818318000450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Paul. 2017. Chief Economist, International Institute for Environment and Development. Interview by author, September 5.Google Scholar
Stone, Diana. 2017. “Understanding the Transfer of Policy Failure: Bricolage, Experimentalism and Translation.” Policy & Politics 45(1): 5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tienhaara, Kyla. 2013. “Varieties of Green Capitalism.” Environmental Politics 23(2): 187204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toens, K., and Landwehr, C.. 2009. “The Uncertain Potential of Policy Learning.” Policy Studies 30(3): 347–63.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. UNDP official. 2018. Interview by author, April 17.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). 2005a. “Report of the Ministerial Conference on Environment and Development in Asia and the Pacific.” E/ESCAP/MCED(05)/Rep.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). 2005b. “Achieving Environmentally Sustainable Economic Growth in Asia and the Pacific.” E/ESCAP/SO/MCED(05)/7.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). 2006. Green Growth at a Glance: The Way Forward for Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok, Thailand: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). 2009. Global Green New Deal: Policy Brief. Geneva: UNEP.Google Scholar
Van Benthem, Arthur, Gillingham, Kenneth, and Sweeney, James. 2008. “Learning-by-Doing and the Optimal Solar Policy in California.” Energy Journal 29(3): 131–51.Google Scholar
Vetterlein, Antje, and Moschella, Manuela. 2014. “International Organizations and Organizational Fields.” European Political Science Review 6(1): 143–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2006. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion: Social Sector Reform in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2012. “The Arab Spring: Why the Surprising Similarities with the Revolutionary Wave of 1848?Perspectives on Politics 10(4): 917–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2006. The World Bank Annual Report 2006. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2008. The World Bank Annual Report 2008. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2010. The World Bank Annual Report 2010. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2012. Inclusive Green Growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

llan and Meckling Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

llan and Meckling supplementary material

llan and Meckling supplementary material

Download llan and Meckling supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 326 KB
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Creative Learning and Policy Ideas: The Global Rise of Green Growth
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Creative Learning and Policy Ideas: The Global Rise of Green Growth
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Creative Learning and Policy Ideas: The Global Rise of Green Growth
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *