Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T03:41:01.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to Howard and Walters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2014

Abstract

This response points to three critical problems in Explaining the Unexpected. First, the authors' contention that scholars ignored “everyday contestation,” including changing citizen-state relations, emerging venues of political participation, and the potential for mobilization, is based on a selective reading of the literature on politics in the Arab world before 2011. Second, their assertion that existing paradigms hindered scholars' ability to understand change mischaracterizes the literature on enduring authoritarianism. Scholars did not argue that regime breakdown was impossible before 2011 but rather sought to understand why authoritarian regimes were sustained. Long before the uprisings, they recognized the factors that could make breakdown possible. Third, Howard and Walters' conclusion that Middle East scholars' fundamental paradigms and their focus on regime type will lead them to treat “utterly remarkable waves of mass mobilization as politically inconsequential” is misplaced. The literature has and continues to explore a wide range of issues that extend far beyond democratization, and recent scholarship has examined varied aspects of the diverse political processes and outcomes witnessed since 2011. Explaining the Unexpected misses the mark on many points, but it does provide a useful platform for scholars to reflect on problems facing comparative politics. These include the blinders resulting from the normative biases underpinning the discipline and the need for a nuanced discussion about how, and to what extent, scholars facing rapid, regional transformations can learn from the study of similar experiences in other regions.

Type
Reflections Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, Holger, ed. 2010. Contentious Politics in the Middle East: Political Opposition under Authoritarianism. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinin, Joel, and Vairel, Frédéric. 2011. Social Movements, Mobilization, and Contestation in the Middle East and North Africa. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cantori, Louis J., Jacoby, Tim, Carapico, Sheila, Shehata, Samer, Lust-Okar, Ellen, Bargu-Hasturk, Banu, Robinson, Glenn E. and Al-Kitbi, Ebtesam. 2002. “Political Succession in the Middle East.” Middle East Policy 9(3): 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Mahdi, Rabab, and Marfleet, Philip, eds. 2009. Egypt: The Moment of Change. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lust, Ellen. 2009. “Democratization by Elections? Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East.” Journal of Democracy July 20(3): 122–35.Google Scholar
Lust, Ellen. 2011. “Why Now? Micro Transitions and the Arab Uprisings.” Available on The Monkey Cage, http://301a32ba31149ad50392-db76e8c8d94f3afdf40f06644f9ca222.r22.cf1.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Ellen_Lust_final.pdf (accessed February 10, 2014).Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, Ellen. 2005. “Why the Failure of Democratization? Explaining ‘Middle East Exceptionalism.’” Unpublished manuscript available at http://www.politics.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/4751/lust-okar.pdf (accessed February 24, 2014).Google Scholar