Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Gender Inequality in Deliberation: Unpacking the Black Box of Interaction

  • Tali Mendelberg, Christopher F. Karpowitz and J. Baxter Oliphant
Abstract

When and why do women gain from increased descriptive representation in deliberating bodies? Using a large randomized experiment, and linking individual-level speech with assessments of speaker authority, we find that decision rules interact with the number of women in the group to shape the conversation dynamics and deliberative authority, an important form of influence. With majority rule and few women, women experience a negative balance of interruptions when speaking, and these women then lose influence in their own eyes and in others’. But when the group is assigned to unanimous rule, or when women are many, women experience a positive balance of interruptions, mitigating the deleterious effect of small numbers. Men do not experience this pattern. We draw implications for a type of representation that we call authoritative representation, and for democratic deliberation.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anderson, Joel, and Honneth, Axel. 2005. “Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice.” In Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, ed. Christman, John and Anderson, Joel. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Kristin J., and Leaper, Campbell. 1998. “Meta-Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where and How.” Sex Roles 39(3-4): 222–52.
Aries, Elizabeth. 1976. “Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed Groups.” Small Group Behavior 7(1): 718.
Aries, Elizabeth, Gold, Conrad, and Weigel, Russell H.. 1983. “Dispositional and Situational Influences on Dominance Behavior in Small Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(4): 779–86.
Bales, Robert F. 1970. Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ban, Radu, and Rao, Vijayendra. 2009. “Is Deliberation Equitable? Evidence from Transcripts of Village Meetings in South India.” Policy Research Working Paper 4928. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Beck, Susan Abrams. 2001. “Acting as Women: The Effects and Limitations in Local Governance.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Carroll, Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Beckwith, Karen, and Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2007. “Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation.” Perspectives on Politics 5(3): 553–65.
Bernstein, Elizabeth. 2012. “Speaking Up Is Hard to Do: Researchers Explain Why,” The Wall Street Journal, February 7, 2012. Available at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204136404577207020525853492.html (accessed March 19, 2013).
Besley, Timothy, Pande, Rohini, Lupin, Rahman, and Rao, Vijayendra. 2005. “Participatory Democracy in Action: Survey Evidence from South India.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3(2-3): 648–57.
Bickford, Susan. 1996. The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, and Citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bouas, Kelly S., and Komorita, S. S.. 1996. “Group Discussion and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22(11): 1144–50.
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bryan, Frank M. 2004. Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Carli, Linda L. 1989. “Gender Differences in Interaction Style and Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(4): 565–76.
Carli, Linda L. 1990. “Gender, Language, and Influence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59(5): 941–51.
Carroll, Susan J. 2001. “Introduction.” In The Impact of Women in Public Office, ed. Carroll, Susan J.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Chambers, Simone. 2003. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 307–26.
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72(5): 1409–43.
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Should Feminists Give Up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes.” Politics & Gender 2(4): 522–30.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Searing, Donald D., and Crewe, Ivor M.. 2002. “The Deliberative Potential of Political Discussion.” British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 2162.
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2010. Local Parties, Local Candidates, and Women’s Representation: How County Parties Affect Who Runs for and Wins Political Office. Ph.D. diss., Department of Politics, Princeton University.
Dahlerup, Drude. 2012. “Preface.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Devine, Dennis J., Clayton, Laura, Dunford, Benjamin B., Seying, Rasmy, and Price, Jennifer. 2001. “Jury Decision Making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 73(3): 622727.
Dovidio, John F., Brown, Clifford E., Heltman, Karen, Ellyson, Steve L., and Keating, Caroline F.. 1988. “Power Displays between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multi-Channel Study.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(4): 580–87.
Eagly, Alice H., and Johnson, Blair T.. 1990. “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 108(2): 233–56.
Esterling, Kevin M., Fung, Archon, and Lee, Taeku. 2009. “How Much Disagreement Is Good for Democratic Deliberation? The California Speaks Health Care Reform Experiment.” Presented at the 2nd Annual West Coast Experimental Political Science Conference, Del Mar, CA, May 15.
Fay, Nicolas, Garrod, Simon, and Carletta, Jean. 2000. “Group Discussion as Interactive Dialogue or as Serial Monologue: The Influence of Group Size.” Psychological Science 11(6): 481–86.
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women’s Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1): 5973.
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2012. “Conceptualizing the Impact of Gender Quotas.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frohlich, Norman, and Oppenheimer, Joe A.. 1990. “Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production.” American Political Science Review 84(2): 461–77.
Frohlich, Norman, and Oppenheimer, Joe A.. 1992. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fung, Archon. 2003. “Deliberation Where You Least Expect It: Citizen Participation in Government.” Connections (Fall): 3033.
Gastil, John, Pierre Deess, E., Weiser, Philip J., and Simmons, Cindy. 2010. The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gneezy, Uri, Leonard, Kenneth L., and List, John A.. 2009. “Gender Differences in Competition: Evidence from a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society.” Econometrica 77(5): 1637–64.
Greig, Fiona, and Bohnet, Iris. 2009. “Exploring Gendered Behavior in the Field with Experiments: Why Public Goods Are Provided by Women in a Nairobi Slum.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 70(1-2): 19.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society . Trans. McGarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Burger, T., with Lawrence, F.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jurgen. 1999. “Introduction.” Ratio Juris 12(4): 329–35.
Hannagan, Rebecca J., and Larimer, Christopher. 2011. “Out-Group Threat and Gender Balance in Policymaking Groups.” Presented at the 2nd European Conference on Politics and Gender, Central European University in Budapest, Hungary, January 13–15.
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 529–50.
Htun, Mala, and Laurel Weldon, S.. 2010. “When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equity Policy.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 207–16.
Htun, Mala, and Laurel Weldon, S.. 2012. “The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005.” American Political Science Review 106(3): 548–69.
Huddy, Leonie, Cassese, Erin, and Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2008. “Gender, Public Opinion, and Political Reasoning.” In Political Women and American Democracy, ed. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Humphreys, Macartan, Fearon, James D., and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2011. “Democratic Institutions and Collective Action Capacity: Results from a Field Experiment in Post-Conflict Liberia." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in Seattle, WA, September 1–4.
Humphreys, Macartan, Masters, William A., and Sandbu, Martin E.. 2006. “Democratic Deliberations: Results from a Field Experiment in São Tomé and Príncipe.” World Politics 53(4): 583622.
Imai, Kosuke, Keel, Luke, and Tingley, Dustin. 2010. “A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis.” Psychological Methods 15(4): 309–34.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., Cook, Fay L., and Delli Carpini, Michael X.. 2009. Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
James, Michael Rabinder. 2008. “Descriptive Representation in the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly.” In Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, ed. Warren, Mark E. and Pearse, Hilary. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Cathryn. 1994. “Gender, Legitimate Authority, and Leader-Subordinate Conversations.” American Sociological Review 59(1): 122–35.
Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 965–90.
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 560–76.
Kanthak, Kristin, and Krause, George A.. 2010. “Valuing Diversity in Political Organizations: Gender and Token Minorities in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4): 839–84.
Kaplan, Martin F., and Miller, Charles E.. 1987. “Group Decision-Making and Normative versus Informational Influence: Effects of Type of Issue and Assigned Decision Rule.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(2): 306–13.
Karakowsky, Leonard, McBey, Kenneth, and Miller, Diane L.. 2004. “Gender, Perceived Competence, and Power Displays Examining Verbal Interruptions in a Group Context.” Small Group Research 35(4): 407–39.
Karakowsky, Leonard, and Siegel, J. P.. 1999. “The Effects of Proportional Representation and Gender Orientation of the Task on Emergent Leadership Behavior in Mixed-Gender Work Groups.” Journal of Applied Psychology 84(4): 620–31.
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. Forthcoming. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation, and Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Karpowitz, Christopher F. 2006. Having a Say: Public Hearings, Deliberation, and Democracy in America. Ph.D. diss., Department of Politics, Princeton University.
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Shaker, Lee. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106(3): 533–47.
Kollock, Peter, Blumstein, Philip, and Schwartz, Pepper. 1985. “Sex and Power in Interaction: Conversational Privileges and Duties.” American Sociological Review 50(1): 3446.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Quota Laws for Women in Politics: Implications for Feminist Practice.” Social Politics 15(3): 345–68.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Leaper, Campbell, and Ayres, Melanie M.. 2007. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults’ Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 11(4): 328–63.
Losada, Marcial, and Heaphy, Emily. 2004. “The Role of Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of Business Teams: A Nonlinear Dynamics Model.” American Behavioral Scientist 47(6): 740–65.
Macedo, Stephen. 1999. “Introduction.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macedo, Stephen, ed. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do about It. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
Maltz, Daniel, and Borker, Ruth. 1982. “A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication.” In Language and Social Identity, ed. Gumperz, John. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61(3): 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane J., Hartz-Karp, Janette, Amengual, Matthew, and Gastil, John. 2006. “Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study.” Journal of Public Deliberation 2(1): article 7.
Mattei, Laura R. Winsky. 1998. “Gender and Power in American Legislative Discourse.” Journal of Politics 60(2): 440–61.
Mendelberg, Tali, Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Goedert, Nicholas. Forthcoming. “Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women’s Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science.
Mendez, Jeanette M., and Osborn, Tracy. 2010. “Gender and the Perception of Knowledge in Political Discussion.” Political Research Quarterly 63(2): 269–79.
Morton, Rebecca M., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mulac, Anthony, Lundell, Torberg Louisa, and Bradac, James J.. 1986. “Male/female Language Differences and Attributional Consequences in a Public Speaking Situation: Toward an Explanation of the Gender-Linked Language Effect.” Communication Monographs 53(2): 116–29.
Mulac, Anthony, Wiemann, John M., Widenmann, Sally J., and Gibson, Toni W.. 1988. “Male/female Language Differences and Effects in Same-Sex and Mixed-Sex Dyads: The Gender-Linked Language Effect and Mutual Influence.” Communication Monographs 55(4): 315–55.
Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nemeth, Charlan. 1977. “Interactions between Jurors as a Function of Majority vs. Unanimity Decision Rules.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 7(1): 3856.
Ng, Sik Hung, Brooke, Mark, and Dunne, Michael. 1995. “Interruption and Influence in Discussion Groups.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14(4): 369–81.
Pande, Rohini, and Ford, Deanna. 2011. Gender Quotas and Female Leadership: A Review. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Pearson, Kathryn, and Dancey, Logan. 2011. “Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress: Speech Participation in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 64(4): 910–23.
Piliavin, Jane A., and Martin, Rachel R.. 1978. “The Effects of the Sex Composition of Groups on Style of Social Interaction.” Sex Roles 4(2): 281–96.
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Reingold, Beth. 2008. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy, ed. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 1982. “Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.” American Sociological Review 47(1): 7688.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001. “Gender, Status, and Leadership.” Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 637–55.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Johnson, Cathryn. 1990. “What Is the Relationship between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups?American Journal of Sociology 95(5): 1189–212.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Berger, Joseph, and Smith, LeRoy. 1985. “Nonverbal Cues and Status: An Expectation States Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 90(5): 955–78.
Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 191216.
Rudman, Laurie A., and Glick, Peter. 2001. “Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash toward Agentic Women.” Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 743–62.
Sanders, Lynn M. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25(3): 347–76.
Sidanius, Jim, and Pratto, Felicia. 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Brody, Charles. 1989. “Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition.” American Sociological Review 54(3): 424–35.
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2007. “Measuring Deliberation's Content: A Coding Scheme.” Journal of Public Deliberation 3(1): Article 12.
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballatine Books.
Tannen, Deborah. 2009. “Framing and Face: The Relevance of the Presentation of Self to Linguistic Discourse Analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 72(4): 300–05.
United Nations. 1995. Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. The United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women. Available at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/decision.htm (accessed November 22, 2013).
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for the Advancement of Women. 2005. “Equal Participation of Women and Men in Decision-making Processes, with Particular Emphasis on Political Participation and Leadership.” Expert Group Meeting, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 24–27 October 2005. Available at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/eql-men/ (accessed June 14, 2013).
Walsh, Katherine Cramer. 2007. Talking About Race: Community Dialogues and the Politics of Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2011. “Deliberative Electoral Campaigns and Transition from Clientelism: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin.” Department of Politics, Princeton University Working Paper.
Wood, Wendy, and Karten, Stephen J.. 1986. “Sex Differences in Interaction Style as a Product of Perceived Sex Differences in Competence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(2): 341–47.
Young, Iris M. 1996. “Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Young, Iris M. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29(5): 670–90.
Zimmerman, Don H., and West, Candace. 1975. “Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation.” In Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, eds. Thorne, Barrie and Henley, Nancy. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Mendelberg et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (3.3 MB)
3.3 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed