Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T14:44:07.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring the Quality of Life in the U.S.: Political Reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Debra Satz
Affiliation:
Bowen H. McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society at Stanford University

Extract

Per capita gross domestic product (GDP) is not the best indicator of a nation's well-being. A nation can be relatively wealthy, but many of its people may be living under circumstances of misery and deprivation. Some people may be unable to transform their own wealth into things that really matter to them (think of those with severe disabilities or ill health); background social arrangements may have significant causal effects on individual well-being (think of physical security); and some of the most important components of a person's well-being may be nonmonetary (think of the importance of family and friends). A nation's GDP tells us nothing about how its wealth is distributed for different public purposes. (Recall the criticism by Martin Luther King, Jr., of America's priorities in 1967: “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”) Nor does GDP reveal how wealth is distributed among a nation's people. It may, therefore, tell us little about how the nation's very poorest members are faring.

Type
Review Symposium: Measuring the Quality of Life in the U.S.: Political Reflections
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sen, Amartya. 1992. Inequality Re-examined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar