Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T06:59:29.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Politics and Biology

A Discussion of Peter K. Hatemi and Rose McDermott's Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2013

Leslie Paul Thiele*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Florida

Extract

Man Is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics. Edited by Peter K. Hatemi and Rose McDermott. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011. 352p. $80.00 cloth, $27.50 paper.

Peter K. Hatemi and Rose McDermott's Man Is by Nature a Political Animal brings together some of the most important social scientists working at the intersection of political science, psychology, biology, and cognitive neuroscience. Given recent advances in cognitive neuroscience and given the proliferation of work in political science that draws on these advances, we have decided to invite a range of political scientists to comment on the promise and the limits of this line of inquiry. What can scientific developments in psychology, biology, and neuroscience tell us about “human nature”? Can these discourses reckon with the variation in time and space that has traditionally been at the heart of political science, perhaps even going back to the classic text from which Hatemi and McDermott derive their title, Aristotle's Politics?—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor

Type
Review Symposium: Politics and Biology
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle. 1953. The Ethics of Aristotle, trans. J. A. K. Thomson. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Boyke, Janina, Driemeyer, Joenna, Gaser, Christian, Buchel, Christian, and May, Arne. 2008. “Training-Induced Brain Structure Changes in the Elderly.” Journal of Neuroscience 28(28): 7031–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin, Harcourt Books.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Michael S. 1998. The Mind's Past. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Elkhonon. 2001. The Executive Brain: Frontal Lobes and the Civilized Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, Joseph. 2002. The Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McGilchrist, Iain. 2009. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 2012. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Plato. 1989. The Collected Dialogues of Plato, ed. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., and Blakeslee, Sandra. 1998. Phantoms in the Brain. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jeffrey, and Begley, Sharon. 2002. The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1990. Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of the Soul. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 2006. The Heart of Judgment: Practical Wisdom, Neuroscience, and Narrative. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thiele, Leslie Paul. 2012. “Brain Sculpting as Moral Practice: A Neuro-Aristotelian Approach.” In Essays on Neuroscience and Political Theory: Thinking the Body Politic, ed. Vander Valk, Frank. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Evan. 2010. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar