Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Representation in Context: Election Laws and Ideological Congruence Between Citizens and Governments

  • G. Bingham Powell (a1)
Abstract

Democratic theory assumes that successful democratic representation will create close ideological congruence between citizens and their governments. The success of different types of election rules in creating such congruence is an ongoing target of political science research. As often in political science, a widely demonstrated empirical finding, the greater congruence associated with proportional representation election rules, has ceased to hold. I suggest that systematically taking account in our theories of conditional effects of local context can often provide a remedy. The systematic incorporation of levels of political party polarization into theory of election laws and ideological congruence extended the temporal and spatial range of the theory. Data from the Comparative Manifesto research program and the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) research program are used to test the revised theory empirically. Suggestions for generalizing our theories of political context are offered. The results of this research continue the interactions between substantive research, ongoing political events, and the great normative issues of representation and democracy.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Blais Andre, and Bodet Marc A.. 2006. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers?Comparative Political Studies 39: 1243–63.
Budge Ian, Klingemann Hans-Dieter, Volkens Andrea, Bara Judith, and Tanenbaum Eric. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cox Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Alternative Voting Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 903935.
Cox Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crisp Brian F., Olivella Santiago, and Potter Joshua D.. 2012. “Electoral Contexts that Impede Voter Coordination.” Electoral Studies 31: 143–58.
Dahl Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dalton Russell J. 2008. “The Quantity and Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement and Its Consequences.” Comparative Political Studies 41: 899920.
Dalton Russell J., and Anderson Christopher J., eds. 2011. Citizens, Context and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens' Electoral Choices. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Duverger Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley.
Ferree Karen E., Powell G. Bingham, and Scheiner Ethan. 2012. “How Context Shapes Electoral Rule Effects.” In APSA Presidential Task Force on Electoral Rules and Democratic Governance, Report, prepared for presentation at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, August 31, 2012.
Golder Matthew, and Stramski Jacek. 2007. “Ideological Congruence and Two Visions of Democracy.” Presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September, 2007.
Golder Sona N. 2006. The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Grofman Barnard. 2004. “Downs and Two-Party Convergence.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 2546.
Huber John D., and Powell G. Bingham. 1994. “Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46: 291326.
Kim HeeMin, and Fording Richard C.. 1998. “Voter Ideology in Western Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 33: 7397.
Kim HeeMin, and Fording Richard C.. 2002. “Government Partisanship in Western Democracies, 1945–1998.” European Journal of Political Research 41: 187206.
Kim HeeMin, and Fording Richard C.. 2003. “Voter Ideology in Western Democracies: An Update.” European Journal of Political Research 42: 95105.
Kim HeeMin, Powell G. Bingham, and Fording Richard C.. 2010. “Electoral Systems, Party Systems and Ideological Representation.” Comparative Politics 42: 167–86.
Klingemann Hans-Dieter, Volkens Andrea, Bara Judith, Budge Ian, and McDonald Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II. New York: Oxford University Press.
Laakso Markku, and Taagepera Rein. 1979. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 327.
Laver Michael, and Budge Ian, eds. 1993. Party Policy and Coalition Government in Western Europe. London: Macmillan.
Laver Michael, and Schofield Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDonald Michael D., Mendes Silvia, and Budge Ian. 2004. “What Are Elections For? Conferring the Median Mandate.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 126.
McDonald Michael D., and Budge Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell Paul, and Nyblade Benjamin. 2008. “Government Formation and Cabinet Type.” In Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining, ed. Strom Kaare, Mueller Wolfgang and Bergman Torgjoern. New York: Oxford University Press.
Moser Robert G., and Scheiner Ethan. 2012. Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Powell G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Powell G. Bingham. 2008. “Party System Change, Election Rules and Ideological Congruence.” Chicago: Midwest Political Science Association, April, 2008.
Powell G. Bingham. 2009. “The Ideological Congruence Controversy.” Comparative Political Studies 42: 1475–97.
Powell G. Bingham. 2011. “Party Polarization and the Ideological Congruence of Governments.” In Citizens, Context and Choice, ed. Dalton Russell J. and Anderson Christopher J.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Powell G. Bingham, and Vanberg Georg. 2000. “Election Laws, Disproportionality and the Left-Right Dimension.” British Journal of Political Science 30: 383411.
Rae Douglas. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Warwick Paul V. 1994. Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Perspectives on Politics
  • ISSN: 1537-5927
  • EISSN: 1541-0986
  • URL: /core/journals/perspectives-on-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 55 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 251 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.