No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
You Say You'll Change the Constitution?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 August 2005
Extract
Ten years from now, what kinds of issues of interest to politics will dominate the agenda of the United States Supreme Court? Will a dominant approach to constitutional interpretation emerge to guide the justices in their handling of these significant cases?Keith E. Whittington is professor of politics at Princeton University and visiting professor of law at the University of Texas, Austin (kwhittington@law.utexas.edu).
- Type
- SYMPOSIUM: TEN YEARS FROM NOW
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2005 American Political Science Association
References
Devins, Neal.
1996.
Shaping constitutional values: Elected government, the Supreme
Court, and the abortion debate.
Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Epp, Charles R.
1999.
External pressure and the Supreme Court's agenda. In
Supreme Court decision-making: New institutionalist
approaches, ed.
Cornell W. Clayton and
Howard Gillman,
255–79.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Epstein, Lee, and
Joseph F. Kobylka.
1992.
The Supreme Court and legal change: Abortion and the death
penalty.
Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press.
Goldstein, Leslie Friedman, and
Diana Stech.
1995.
Explaining Transformations in Supreme Court Policy.
Judicature
79 (2):
80–85.Google Scholar
Hellman, Arthur D.
1997.
The shrunken docket of the Rehnquist Court. In
The 1996 Supreme Court Review, ed.
Dennis J. Hutchinson,
David A. Strauss, and
Geoffrey R. Stone,
403–38.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Lanier, Drew Noble.
2003.
Of time and judicial behavior: United States Supreme Court
agenda-setting and decision-making, 1880–1997.
Cranbury, NJ:
Associated University Presses.
McGuire, Kevin T., and
Gregory A. Caldeira.
1993.
Lawyers, organized interests, and the law of obscenity: Agenda
setting in the Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review
87 (3):
717–26.Google Scholar
Pacelle, Richard L. Jr.
1991.
The transformation of the Supreme Court's agenda: From the New
Deal to the Reagan administration.
Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Pickerill, J. Mitchell, and
Cornell W. Clayton.
2004.
The Rehnquist Court and the political dynamics of federalism.
Perspectives on Politics
2 (2):
233–48.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey.
2005. The unregulated offensive.
New York Times Magazine, April 17.
Tushnet, Mark.
2003.
The new constitutional order.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.