Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Defining and identifying crop landraces

  • Tania Carolina Camacho Villa (a1), Nigel Maxted (a1), Maria Scholten (a1) and Brian Ford-Lloyd (a1)

Awareness of the need for biodiversity conservation is now universally accepted, but most often recent conservation activities have focused on wild species. Crop species and the diversity between and within them has significant socioeconomic as well as heritage value. The bulk of genetic diversity in domesticated species is located in traditional varieties maintained by traditional farming systems. These traditional varieties, commonly referred to as landraces, are severely threatened by genetic extinction primarily due to their replacement by modern genetically uniform varieties. The conservation of landrace diversity has been hindered in part by the lack of an accepted definition to define the entity universally recognized as landraces. Without a definition it would be impossible to prepare an inventory and without an inventory changes in landrace constituency could not be recognized over time. Therefore, based on a literature review, workshop discussion and interviews with key informants, common characteristics of landraces were identified, such as: historical origin, high genetic diversity, local genetic adaptation, recognizable identity, lack of formal genetic improvement, and whether associated with traditional farming systems. However, although these characteristics are commonly present they are not always all present for any individual landrace; several crop-specific exceptions were noted relating to crop propagation method (sexual or asexual), breeding system (self-fertilized or cross-fertilized species), length of formal crop improvement, seed management (selection or random propagation) and use. This paper discusses the characteristics that generally constitute a landrace, reviews the exceptions to these characteristics and provides a working definition of a landrace. The working definition proposed is as follows: ‘a landrace is a dynamic population(s) of a cultivated plant that has historical origin, distinct identity and lacks formal crop improvement, as well as often being genetically diverse, locally adapted and associated with traditional farming systems’.

Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

CJM Almekinders and A Elings (2001) Collaboration of farmers and breeders: participatory crop improvement in perspective. Euphytica 122: 425438.

CJM Almekinders , NP de Louwaars and GH Bruijin (1994) Local seed systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica 78: 207216.

M Altieri and LC Merrick (1987) In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Economic Botany 41: 8696.

MR Bellon (1996) The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: a conceptual framework at the farmer level. Economic Botany 50: 2639.

MR Bellon and S Brush (1994) Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Economic Botany 48: 196209.

SB Brush (1992) Ethnoecology, biodiversity and modernization in Andean potato agriculture. Economic Botany 35: 7088.

SB Brush (1995) In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Science 35: 346354.

DA Cleveland , D Soleri and SE Smith (1994) Folk crop varieties: do they have a role in sustainable agriculture?. BioScience 44: 740751.

DA Cleveland , D Soleri and SE Smith (2000) A biological framework for understanding farmers' plant breeding. Economic Botany 54: 377394.

DN Duvick (1984) Genetic diversity in major farm crops on the farm and in reserve. Economic Botany 38: 162178.

JR Harlan (1975) Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188: 618621.

D Louette , A Charrier and J Berthaud (1997) In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Economic Botany 51: 2038.

N Maxted , L Guarino , L Myer and EA Chiwona (2002) Towards a methodology for on-farm conservation of plant genetic resources. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49: 3146.

V Negri (2003) Landraces in central Italy: where and why they are conserved and perspectives for their on farm conservation. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50: 871885.

JP Peeters and NW Galwey (1988) Germplasm collections and breeding needs in Europe. Economic Botany 42: 503521.

JJ Sanchez , MM Goodman and CW Stuber (2000) Isozymatic and morphological diversity in the races of maize in Mexico. Economic Botany 54: 4359.

D Lenné JM Wood (1997) The conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm: questioning the emerging paradigm. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 109129.

AC Zeven (1996) Results of activities to maintain landraces and other material in some European countries in situ before 1945 and what we may learn from them. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43: 337341.

AC Zeven (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104: 127139.

AC Zeven (1999) The traditional inexplicable replacement of seed and seed ware of landraces and cultivars: a review. Euphytica 110: 181191.

AC Zeven (2000) Traditional maintenance breeding of landraces: 1. Data by crop. Euphytica 116: 6585.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Plant Genetic Resources
  • ISSN: 1479-2621
  • EISSN: 1479-263X
  • URL: /core/journals/plant-genetic-resources
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 146 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1135 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.