Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T12:05:37.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why Major in Literature—–What Do We Tell Our Students?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

If the value of the study of literature were self-evident, there would be no need to pose this question. That such is not the case is clear from the virulence of the debates about higher education in the humanities that have roiled the profession and areas beyond. Professors of literature have had a lot to say to one another about this question but not, perhaps, as much to say to their students. Yet faculty members implicitly answer this question all the time, in the courses they teach, especially in introductory, or “gateway,” courses. I will address the question, then, as concretely as possible, by way of the introductory course for the English major my colleagues and I have designed together and discussed repeatedly over the past two decades at Wesleyan University. In so doing, I will argue that the value of studying literature is precisely that it poses value as a question, not an answer.

Type
The Changing Profession
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Ed. Arendt, Hannah. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken, 1969.Google Scholar
Charlotte, Brontë. Jane Eyre. London: Penguin, 1988.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. “The Twenty-First Century University and the Market: What Price Economic Viability?Differences 12.1 (2001): 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, Robert. The Rise and Fall of English. New Haven: Ya le UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Three Women's Texts and a Critique of Imperialism.” “Race,” Writing, and Difference. Ed. Gates, Henry Louis Jr. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986. 262–80.Google Scholar