Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Becoming an Arctic Council NGO observer

  • Danita Catherine Burke (a1) and Teale N. Phelps Bondaroff (a2)

Abstract

This paper explores the question: How is the NGO observer application process to the Arctic Council influenced by perceptions of legitimacy of the applicant? Using information gleamed from numerous interviews we map out the application process for NGO observer status in the Arctic Council. In addition to the formal criteria, we argue that Arctic states have a set of informal criteria for evaluating NGO observer applications, and that the evaluation of these criteria are coloured by individual Arctic state and the Permanent Participant perceptions of the legitimacy of the NGO applicant. Reaching into the literature on NGO legitimacy, we develop a framework detailing four key components upon which the perceptions of the legitimacy of an NGO are generally formed. This framework is then incorporated into a broader model of the overall application process through which NGOs must submit in order to attempt to gain observer status at the Arctic Council.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Arctic Council. (1996). Ottawa Declaration: Declaration on the establishment of the Arctic Council, joint communiqué of the governments of the Arctic Countries on the establishment of the Arctic Council. Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved September 19, 1996, from http://hdl.handle.net/11374/85
Arctic Council. (2013a). Arctic Council rules of procedure as revised by the Arctic Council at the 8th Arctic Council ministerial meeting. Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11374/940
Arctic Council. (2013b). Observer manual for subsidiary bodies as adopted by the Arctic Council at the 8th Arctic Council ministerial meeting. Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11374/939
Arctic Council. (2015a). Member states. Retrieved from https://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/member-states
Arctic Council. (2015b). Permanent Participants. Retrieved from http://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/permanent-participants
Arctic Council. (2015c). Observer manual for subsidiary bodies as adopted by the Arctic Council at the 8th Arctic Council ministerial meeting, Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013, and addendum approved by the senior Arctic officials at the meeting of the senior Arctic officials. Anchorage, United States of America, 20–22 October 2015. Tromsø: Arctic Council Secretariat. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11374/939
Arctic Council. (2017a). New observer: National Geographic Society. Retrieved from https://www.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work2/8-news-and-events/459-observer-national-geographic
Arctic Council. (2017b). New observer: Oceana. Retrieved from http://333.arctic-council.org/index.php/en/our-work2/8-news-and-events/462-observer-oceana
Arnaudo, R. V. (2013). United States policy in the Arctic. In Berkman, P. A. & Vylegzhanin, A. N. (Eds.), Environmental security in the Arctic Ocean. Dordrecht: Springer.
Arts, B. (2003–2004). Gemeinschaftsgüter: Recht, Politik, und Ökonomie. Preprints aus der Max-Planck-Projecktgruppe. [Non-states actors in global governance: Three faces of power]. Bonn, Germany: Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter.
Auer, M. R. (2000). Who participates in global environmental governance? Partial answers from international relations theory. Policy Sciences, 33(2), 155180.
Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2004). Transnational networks and global environmental governance: The cities for climate protection program. International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 471493.
Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2001). NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 6585.
Burke, D. C. (in press). Diplomacy and the Arctic Council. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
Burke, D. C., & Rahbek-Clemmensen, J. (2017). Debating the Arctic during the Ukraine crisis – comparing Arctic state identities and media discourses in Canada and Norway. The Polar Journal, 7(2), 391409.
Candler, G., & Dumon, G. (2010). A non-profit accountability framework. Canadian Public Administration, 53(2), 259279.
Clark, I. (2003). Legitimacy in a global order. Review of International Studies, 29(S1), 7595.
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M., & Phelps Bondaroff, T. (2014). From advocacy to confrontation: Direct enforcement by environmental NGOs. International Studies Quarterly, 58(2), 348361.
Fassin, Y. (2009). Inconsistencies in activists’ behaviours and the ethics of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 503521.
Faulconbridge, G. (2007, August 2). Russian sub plants flag under North Pole. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-28784420070802
Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (2001). Very public scandals: Non-profit organizations in trouble. Voluntas, 12(1), 4966.
Hasanat, M. W. (2013). Reforming the Arctic Council against increasing climate change challenges in the North. Michigan State International Law Review, 22(1), 195240.
Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379408.
Jasanoff, S. (1997). NGOs and the environment: From knowledge to action. Third World Quarterly, 18(3), 579594.
Josefsen, E. (2010). The Saami and the national parliaments: Channels for political influence. Geneva & New York: Inter-Parliamentary Union and United Nations Development Programme (Case Study: Promoting inclusive parliaments – the representation of minorities and indigenous peoples in parliament).
Kearns, K. (1994). The strategic management of accountability in non-profit organizations: An analytical framework. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 185192.
Knetch, S. (2017). Exploring different levels of stakeholder activity in international institutions: Late bloomers, regular visitors, and overachievers in the Arctic Council Working Groups. In Keil, K. & Knetch, S. (Eds.), Governing Arctic change: Global perspectives (pp. 163186). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Logister, L. (2007). Global governance and civil society: Some reflections on NGO governance. Journal of Global Ethics, 3(2), 165179.
Morss, E. (1991). The new global players: How they compete and collaborate. World Development, 19(1), 5564.
Nordic Environment Finance Corporation (NEFCO). (n.d.). Structure & management. Retrieved from http://www.nefco.org/who-we-are/structure-management
North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO). (2016). “About”. Retrieved from https://nammco.no/about-us/
Phelps Bondaroff, T., & Burke, D. C. (2014). Bridging troubled waters: History as political opportunity structure. Journal of Civil Society, 10(2), 165183.
Price, R. (2003). Review: Transnational civil society and advocacy in world politics. World Politics, 55(4), 579606.
Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 2541.
Rothwell, D. R. (1995). International law and the protection of the Arctic environment. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 44(2), 280321.
Shadian, J. (2010). From states to polities: Reconceptualizing sovereignty through Inuit governance. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 485510.
Sikkink, K. (2002). Restructuring world politics: The limits and asymmetries of soft power. In Khagram, S., Riker, J. V., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.), Restructuring world politics: Transnational social movements, networks, and norms (pp. 301317). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sikkink, K. (2005). Patterns of dynamic multilevel governance and the insider-outsider coalition. In della Porta, D. & Tarrow, S. (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism: People, passions, and power (pp. 151174). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Steinberg, P. E., & Dodds, K. (2013). The Arctic Council after Kiruna. Polar Record, 51(1), 108110.
Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 765772.
Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow, S., & della Porta, D. (2005). Conclusion: ‘Globalization, ’ complex internationalism, and transnational contention. In della Porta, D. & Tarrow, S. (Eds.), Transnational protest and global activism: People, passions, and power (pp. 227246). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2008). “Circum-Arctic resource appraisal: Estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the Arctic Circle”. USGS Fact Sheet 2008–3049. Retrieved from https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf
Wallace, R. (2013). The case for RAIPON: Implications for Canada and the Arctic Council. Calgary, Canada: Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute (Policy paper). Retrieved from: https://www.cgai.ca/the_case_for_raipon
Welsh Larson, D., Paul, T.V., & Wohlforth, W.C. (2014). Status and world order. In Paul, T. V., Welch Larson, D., & Wohlforth, W. C. (Eds.), Status in world politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Young, O. (2016). The Arctic Council at twenty: How to remain effective in a rapidly changing environment. UC Irving Law Review, 6(99), 99120.
Zelko, F. (2013). Make it a green peace! The rise of counterculture environmentalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Polar Record
  • ISSN: 0032-2474
  • EISSN: 1475-3057
  • URL: /core/journals/polar-record
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed