Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T09:01:18.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy outlook for the Arctic: 2020 and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2015

Graça Ermida
Graça Ermida*
Affiliation:
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, UNL/FCSH, Lisbon, Portugal (ermidag@yahoo.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At least four littoral countries have Arctic strategies that address energy issues. However, US, Canada, Russia and Norway strategies up to 2020 and beyond, reveal different interests in exploring Arctic resources. While Arctic oil and gas are of strategic importance to Russia and to Norway, Canada and the US seem content with continuing their current extraction predominantly south of the Arctic Circle. Despite the different approaches, the outcomes seem strangely similar. Indeed, despite the hype concerning the Arctic in the last decade, and for very diverse reasons, it is unlikely that any of these four countries will increase hydrocarbon production in the Arctic during the period under analysis. This was true even before the recent drop in oil prices. For all its potential, it is unclear what lies ahead for the region.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 170 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AANDC (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada). 2014. Northern oil and gas annual report, 2013. Winnipeg: AANDC.Google Scholar
Baker Institute. 2013. Does drilling in ANWR make more sense than the Alaskan offshore? Houston: Baker Institute. URL: http://bakerinstitutealaska.tumblr.com/post/28374130615/does-drilling-in-anwr-make-more-sense-than-the (accessed 2 April 2015).Google Scholar
Bird, K.J., Charpentier, R.R., Gautier, D.L.and others. 2008. Circum-Arctic resource appraisal; estimates of undiscovered oil and gas north of the Arctic Circle. Melon Park: US Geological Survey (Fact Sheet 2008–3049, version 1.0, 23 July 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callow, L. 2012. Oil and gas exploration and development activity forecast, Canadian Beaufort Sea 2012 – 2027. British Columbia: LTLC Consulting and Salmo Consulting. (Prepared for the Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada).Google Scholar
Canada (Government). 2009. Canada´s northern strategy: our north, our heritage, our future. Ottawa: Government of Canada. URL: http://www.northernstrategy.gc.ca/cns/cns-eng.asp (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
Canada (Government). 2010. Statement on Canada Arctic foreign policy. Ottawa: Government of Canada. URL: http://www.arcticgovernance.org/canadas-arctic-foreign-policy.4811028-142902.html (accessed 2 February 2015).Google Scholar
Drummond, K.J. 2009. Northern Canada distribution of ultimate oil and gas resources. Calgary: Drummond Consulting (Prepared for Northern Oil and Gas Branch Indian and Northern Affairs Canada).Google Scholar
Ermida, G. 2014, Strategic decisions of international oil companies: Arctic versus other regions, Energy Strategy Reviews 2 (3–4): 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazprom. 2014. Gazprom in figures 2009–2013. Fact book, unlocking the planet´s potential. Moscow: URL: http://www.gazprom.com/f/posts/29/761233/gazprom-in-figures-2009-2013-en.pdf (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, S. 2014. Alaska´s oil production tax: comparing the old and the new. Anchorage: Institute of Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Huebert, R. 2010. The newly emerging Arctic security environment. Calgary: Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute.Google Scholar
Humphries, M. 2014. US crude oil and natural gas production in federal and non-federal areas. Washington DC: Congressional Research Services.Google Scholar
Interfaxenergy. 2014. Gazprom Dobycha Yamburg produced 5 tcm of gas at the Yamburg and Zapolyarnoye fields. London: Interfaxenergy. URL: http://interfaxenergy.com/gasdaily/article/13935/gazprom-dobycha-yamburg-produced-5-tcm-of-gas-at-the-yamburg-and-zapolyarnoye-fields (accessed 20 January 2015).Google Scholar
Keithley, B. 2012. Alaska oil policy, out of alignment. Alaska Business Monthly, November 2012.Google Scholar
Keithley, B. 2013. Alaska oil policy, achieving alignment. Alaska Business Monthly, January 2013.Google Scholar
MERF (Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation). 2010. Energy strategy of Russia for the period up to 2030. Moscow: Institute of Energy Strategy.Google Scholar
NMFA (Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs). 2011a. An industry for the future–Norway´s petroleum activities. Oslo: NMFA. (Meld. St. 28 (2010–2011)).Google Scholar
NMFA (Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs). 2011b. The high north visions and strategies, 2011. Oslo: NMFA. (Meld. St. 7 (2011–2012)).Google Scholar
Piskarev, A. and Shkatov, M.. 2012. Energy potential of the Russian Arctic seas, choice of development strategy. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rusnak, M. and Berman, I.. 2008. The foundations of Russian Federation policy in the Arctic until 2020 and beyond. The Journal of International Security Affairs 18: 97–105.Google Scholar
Russia (Government). 2013. The development strategy of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation, approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin on February 20, 2013. Moscow: Government of Russia. URL: http://www.iecca.ru/en/legislation/strategies/item/99-the-development-strategy-of-the-arctic-zone-of-the-russian-federation (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
US. EIA (US Energy Information Administration). 2014a. Annual energy outlook 2014. Washington DC: US Department of Energy.Google Scholar
US. EIA (US Energy Information Administration). 2014b. Norway country analysis brief. Washington DC: US Department of Energy.Google Scholar
USG (US Government). 2013. National strategy for the Arctic region. Washington DC: US Government, The White House.Google Scholar