Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields

  • Michelle L. Dion (a1), Jane Lawrence Sumner (a2) and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell (a3)
Abstract

Accumulated evidence identifies discernible gender gaps across many dimensions of professional academic careers including salaries, publication rates, journal placement, career progress, and academic service. Recent work in political science also reveals gender gaps in citations, with articles written by men citing work by other male scholars more often than work by female scholars. This study estimates the gender gap in citations across political science subfields and across methodological subfields within political science, sociology, and economics. The research design captures variance across research areas in terms of the underlying distribution of female scholars. We expect that subfields within political science and social science disciplines with more women will have smaller gender citation gaps, a reduction of the “Matthew effect” where men’s research is viewed as the most central and important in a field. However, gender citation gaps may persist if a “Matilda effect” occurs whereby women’s research is viewed as less important or their ideas are attributed to male scholars, even as a field becomes more diverse. Analysing all articles published from 2007–2016 in several journals, we find that female scholars are significantly more likely than mixed gender or male author teams to cite research by their female peers, but that these citation rates vary depending on the overall distribution of women in their field. More gender diverse subfields and disciplines produce smaller gender citation gaps, consistent with a reduction in the “Matthew effect”. However, we also observe undercitation of work by women, even in journals that publish mostly female authors. While improvements in gender diversity in academia increase the visibility and impact of scholarly work by women, implicit biases in citation practices in the social sciences persist.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Footnotes
Hide All

Authors’ note: We thank Amanda Meyers for section membership statistics for the American Political Science Association and Yanna Krupnikov, Michael Alvarez, and the anonymous reviewers for helpful feedback. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2017 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. See Dion et al. (2018, doi:10.7910/DVN/R7AQT1) for replication materials.

Contributing Editor: R. Michael Alvarez

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Achen, Christopher. 2014. Why do we need diversity in the political methodology society? The Political Methodologist 21(2):2529.
APSA. 2017. APSA Membership Dashboard . Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.
Aksnes, Dag W., Rorstad, Kristoffer, Piro, Fredrik, and Sivertsen, Gunnar. 2011. Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(4):628636.
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Beaulieu, Emily. 2017. Engaging women: Addressing the gender gap in women’s networking and productivity. PS: Political Science & Politics 50(2):461466.
Beaudry, Catherine, and Larivière, Vincent. 2016. Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine. Research Policy 45(9):17901817.
Blau, Francine, Croson, Rachel, Currie, Janet, and Ginther, Donna K.. 2010. Can mentoring help female assistant professors? Interim results from a randomized trial. American Economic Review 100(2):348352.
Borrego, Ángel, Barrios, Maite, Villarroya, Anna, and Ollé, Candela. 2010. Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: A gender perspective. Scientometrics 83(1):93101.
Bornmann, Lutz, Mutz, Rudiger, and Daniel, Hans-Dieter. 2007. Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis. Journal of Informetrics 1(3):226238.
Cameron, Elissa Z., White, Angela M., and Gray, Meeghan E.. 2016. Solving the productivity and impact puzzle: Do men outperform women, or are metrics biased? BioScience 66(3):245252.
Carter, T. Edison, Smith, Thomas E., and Osteen, Philip J.. 2017. Gender comparisons of social work faculty using h-index scores. Scientometrics 111(3):15471557.
Cassese, Erin C., Bos, Angela L., and Duncan, Lauren E.. 2012. Integrating gender into the political science core curriculum. PS: Political Science & Politics 45(2):238243.
Chamberlain, Scott, Boettiger, Carl, Hart, Ted, and Ram, Karthik. 2016. Rcrossref: Client for Various “CrossRef” APIs (version 0.6.0). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rcrossref/index.html.
Colgan, Jeff. 2017. Gender bias in international relations graduate education? New evidence from syllabi. PS: Political Science & Politics 50(2):456460.
Corley, Elizabeth A., and Sabharwal, Meghna. 2010. Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analysing recent trends. Public Administration 88(3):627648.
Di Vaio, Gianfranco, Waldenström, Daniel, and Weisdorf, Jacob. 2012. Citation success: Evidence from economic history journal publications. Explorations in Economic History 49(1):92104.
Diamond, Arthur M. 1986. What is a citation worth? The Journal of Human Resources 21(2):200215.
Dion, Michelle. 2014. An effort to increase women’s participation: The visions in methodology initiative. The Political Methodologist 21(2):69.
Dion, Michelle L., and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2012. Gender, participation, and citations: Comparing peace science, political methodology, state politics, and IPE conferences. Poster presented at the 2012 Peace Science Society Meeting, Savannah, GA.
Dion, Michelle L., Sumner, Jane Lawrence, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2018. Replication Data for: Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields, doi:10.7910/DVN/R7AQT1, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:CInBeM5eziTIPGjBVTpr4A==.
Ferber, Marianne A. 1986. Citations: Are they an objective measure of scholarly merit? Signs 11(2):381389.
Ferber, Marianne A. 1988. Citations and networking. Gender & Society 2(1):8289.
Ferber, Marianne A., and Brün, Michael. 2011. The gender gap in citations: Does it persist? Feminist Economics 17(1):151158.
Flaherty, Colleen. 2016. “Tenure, Women and Economics.” Inside Higher Ed. December 14. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/12/14/new-study-finds-gender-gaps-tenure-rates-and-career-paths-economics.
Fowler, James H., and Aksnes, Dag W.. 2007. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics 72(3):427437.
Geraci, Lisa, Balsis, Steve, and Busch, Alexander J.. 2015. Gender and the H index in psychology. Scientometrics 105(3):20232034.
Ghiasi, Gita, Larivière, Vincent, and Sugimoto, Cassidy R.. 2016. Gender differences in synchronous and diachronous self-citation. In STI2016—Proceedings of the 21st international conference on science and technology indicators , ed. Rafols, I., Molas-Gallart, J., Castro-Martínez, E., and Woolley, R.. Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, pp. 844851.
Håkanson, Malin. 2005. The impact of gender on citations: an analysis of college & research libraries, journal of academic librarianship, and library quarterly. College & Research Libraries 66(4):312323.
Hardt, Heidi, Kim, Hannah, Meister, Philippe, and Smith, Amy E.. 2017. Diversity by the book: Gender representation in political science graduate training. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Hengel, Erin. 2017. “Publishing While Female.” Working paper, available at www.erinhengel.com/research/.
Hesli, Vicki L., and Lee, Jae Mook. 2011. Faculty research productivity: Why do some of our colleagues publish more than others? PS: Political Science and Politics 44(2):393408.
Hopkins, Allison L., Jawitz, James W., McCarty, Christopher, Goldman, Alex, and Basu, Nandita B.. 2013. Disparities in publication patterns by gender, race and ethnicity based on a survey of a random sample of authors. Scientometrics 96(2):515534.
Hutson, Scott R. 2006. Self-citation in archaeology: Age, gender, prestige, and the self. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 13(1):118.
Hur, Hyungjo, Andalib, Maryam A., Maurer, Julie A., Hawley, Joshua D., and Ghaffarzadegan, Navid. 2017. Recent trends in the U.S. behavioral and social sciences research (BSSR) workforce. PLOS ONE 12(2): e0170887.
King, Molly M., Bergstrom, Carl T., Correll, Shelley J., Jacquet, Jennifer, and West, Jevin D.. 2016. Men set their own cites high: Gender and self-citation across fields and over time. arXiv:1607.00376v2 [physics.soc-ph].
Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia, Glynn, Carroll J., and Huge, Michael. 2013. The matilda effect in science communication: An experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Science Communication 35(5):603625.
Leahey, E., Crockett, J. L., and Hunter, L. A.. 2008. Gendered academic careers: Specializing for success? Social Forces 86(3):12731309.
Leahey, Erin, Beckman, Christine M., and Stanko, Taryn L.. 2017. Prominent but less productive: The impact of interdisciplinarity on scientists’ research. Administrative Science Quarterly 62(1):105139.
Long, J. Scott. 1992. Measures in sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces 71(1):159178.
Maliniak, Daniel, Powers, Ryan, and Walter, Barbara F.. 2013. The gender citation gap in international relations. International Organization 67(4):889922.
McClain, Paula D., Ayee, Gloria Y. A., Means, Taneisha N., ReyesBarriéntez, Alicia M., and Sediqe, Nura A.. 2016. Race, power, and knowledge: Tracing the roots of exclusion in the development of political science in the United States. Politics, Groups, and Identities 4(3):467482.
Mead, Lawrence M. 2010. Scholasticism in political science. Perspectives on Politics 8(2):453464.
Mershon, Carol, and Walsh, Denise. 2016. Diversity in political science: Why it matters and how to get it. Politics, Groups, and Identities 4(3):462466.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Hesli, Vicki L.. 2013. Women don’t ask? Women don’t say no? Bargaining and service in the political science profession. PS: Political Science & Politics 46(2):355369.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, Lange, Samantha, and Brus, Holly. 2013. Gendered citation patterns in international relations journals. International Studies Perspectives 14(4):485492.
Nielsen, Mathias Wullum. 2016. Gender inequality and research performance: Moving beyond individual-meritocratic explanations of academic advancement. Studies in Higher Education 41(11):20442060.
Nittrouer, C. L., Hebl, M. R., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R. C. E., Lane, D. M., and Valian, V. V.. 2018. Biases against female colloquium speakers at top universities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(1):104108.
Nosek, Brian A., Graham, Jesse, Lindner, Nicole M., Kesebir, Selin, Hawkins, Carlee Beth, Hahn, Cheryl, and Schmidt, Kathleen et al. . 2010. Cumulative and career-stage citation impact of social-personality psychology programs and their members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(10):12831300.
Østby, Gudrun, Strand, Håvard, Nordås, Ragnhild, and Gleditsch, Nils Petter. 2013. Gender gap or gender bias in peace research? Publication patterns and citation rates for Journal of Peace Research, 1983–2008. International Studies Perspectives 14(4):493506.
Powell, A., Hassan, T. M., Dainty, A. R. J., and Carter, C.. 2009. Exploring gender differences in construction research: a european perspective. Construction Management and Economics 27(9):803807.
Reece-Evans, Linsay. 2010. Gender and citation in two LIS E-Journals: A bibliometric analysis of LIBRES and information research. LIBRES 20(1):118.
Roberts, Margaret E, Stewart, Brandon M., and Nielsen, Richard. 2017. Matching methods for high-dimensional data with applications to text. Working paper, available at http://www.margaretroberts.net/.
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1993. The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science 23(2):325341.
Shannon, Megan. 2014. Barriers to women’s participation in methodology: Graduate school and beyond. The Political Methodologist 21(2):25.
Slyder, Jacob B., Stein, Beth R., Sams, Brent S., Walker, David M., Beale, B. Jacob, Feldhaus, Jeffrey J., and Copenheaver, Carolyn A.. 2011. Citation pattern and lifespan: A comparison of discipline, institution, and individual. Scientometrics 89:955966.
Stack, Steven. 2002. Gender and scholarly productivity: The case of criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice 30(3):175182.
Sumner, Jane Lawrence. 2018. The gender balance assessment tool (GBAT): A web-based tool for estimating gender balance in syllabi and bibliographies. PS: Political Science & Politics 51(2):396400.
Symonds, Matthew R. E., Gemmell, Neil J., Braisher, Tamsin L., Gorringe, Kylie L., and Elgar, Mark A.. 2006. Gender differences in publication output: Towards an unbiased metric of research performance. Edited by Tom Tregenza. PLoS ONE 1(1):e127.
Teele, Dawn Langan, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2017. Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics 50(2):433447.
Wais, Kamil. 2016. Gender prediction methods based on first names with genderizeR. R Journal 8(1):1737.
Wais, Kamil, VanHoudnos, Nathan, and Ramey, John. 2016. genderizeR: Gender Prediction Based on First Names (version 2.0.0). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/genderizeR/index.html.
Ward, Kathryn B., Gast, Julie, and Grant, Linda. 1992. Visibility and dissemination of women’s and men’s sociological scholarship. Social Problems 39(3):291298.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Analysis
  • ISSN: 1047-1987
  • EISSN: 1476-4989
  • URL: /core/journals/political-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
MathJax

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Dion et al. Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Dion et al. supplementary material
Dion et al. supplementary material 1

 Unknown (621 KB)
621 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed