Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander Ludeke, Steven and Krueger, Robert 2016. The Role of Cognitive Style in the Link Between Genes and Political Ideology. Political Psychology, Vol. 37, Issue. 6, p. 761.
Ojeda, Christopher 2016. The Effect of 9/11 on the Heritability of Political Trust. Political Psychology, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 73.
Oskarsson, Sven Thisted Dinesen, Peter Dawes, Christopher T. Johannesson, Magnus and K. E. Magnusson, Patrik 2016. Education and Social Trust: Testing a Causal Hypothesis Using the Discordant Twin Design. Political Psychology,
Settle, Jaime E. Dawes, Christopher T. Loewen, Peter John and Panagopoulos, Costas 2016. Negative Affectivity, Political Contention, and Turnout: A Genopolitics Field Experiment. Political Psychology,
Dawes, Christopher T. Settle, Jaime E. Loewen, Peter John McGue, Matt and Iacono, William G. 2015. Genes, psychological traits and civic engagement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 370, Issue. 1683, p. 20150015.
Della Bella, Sara and Lucchini, Mario 2015. Education and BMI: a genetic informed analysis. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 49, Issue. 6, p. 2577.
Fazekas, Zoltán and Littvay, Levente 2015. The Importance of Context in the Genetic Transmission of U.S. Party Identification. Political Psychology, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 361.
Fazekas, Zoltán and Hatemi, Peter K. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Friesen, Amanda and Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander 2015. Do Political Attitudes and Religiosity Share a Genetic Path?. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 791.
Konkolÿ Thege, Barna Littvay, Levente Tarnoki, David Laszlo and Tarnoki, Adam Domonkos 2015. Genetic and Environmental Effects on Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-Being: Evidence from a Post-Communist Culture. Current Psychology,
Nielsen, François and Roos, J. Micah 2015. Genetics of Educational Attainment and the Persistence of Privilege at the Turn of the 21st Century. Social Forces, Vol. 94, Issue. 2, p. 535.
Oskarsson, Sven Cesarini, David Dawes, Christopher T. Fowler, James H. Johannesson, Magnus Magnusson, Patrik K. E. and Teorell, Jan 2015. Linking Genes and Political Orientations: Testing the Cognitive Ability as Mediator Hypothesis. Political Psychology, Vol. 36, Issue. 6, p. 649.
Tarnoki, D. L. Tarnoki, A. D. Bata, P. Littvay, L. Garami, Z. Berczi, V. and Karlinger, K. 2015. Different genetic impact in the development of renal length and width: a twin study. Internal Medicine Journal, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 63.
Arden, Rosalind Trzaskowski, Maciej Garfield, Victoria and Plomin, Robert 2014. Genes Influence Young Children’s Human Figure Drawings and Their Association With Intelligence a Decade Later. Psychological Science, Vol. 25, Issue. 10, p. 1843.
Dawes, Christopher Cesarini, David Fowler, James H. Johannesson, Magnus Magnusson, Patrik K. E. and Oskarsson, Sven 2014. The Relationship between Genes, Psychological Traits, and Political Participation. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 4, p. 888.
Gallego, Aina and Pardos-Prado, Sergi 2014. The Big Five Personality Traits and Attitudes towards Immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 79.
Hannagan, Rebecca J. Littvay, Levente and Popa, Sebastian Adrian 2014. Theorizing Sex Differences in Political Knowledge: Insights from a Twin Study. Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue. 01, p. 89.
Hatemi, Peter K. Medland, Sarah E. Klemmensen, Robert Oskarsson, Sven Littvay, Levente Dawes, Christopher T. Verhulst, Brad McDermott, Rose Nørgaard, Asbjørn Sonne Klofstad, Casey A. Christensen, Kaare Johannesson, Magnus Magnusson, Patrik K. E. Eaves, Lindon J. and Martin, Nicholas G. 2014. Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 Measures of Political Ideologies from Five Democracies and Genome-Wide Findings from Three Populations. Behavior Genetics, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 282.
Losco, Joseph 2014. Politics and the Life Sciences: The State of the Discipline.
2014. Politics and the Life Sciences: The State of the Discipline.
As political scientists begin to incorporate biological influences as explanatory factors in political behavior, the need to present a methodological road map for utilizing biometric genetic theory and twin data is apparent. The classical twin design (CTD) remains the most popular design for initial examinations of the source of variance among social and political behaviors, and a vast majority of advanced variance components models as well as some molecular analyses are extensions of the CTD. Thus, it is appropriate to begin a series of works with the CTD and its most common variants. The CTD has strong roots in biometrical genetic theory and provides estimates of the correlations between observed traits of monozygotic and dizygotic twins in terms of underlying genetic and environmental influences. The majority of these analyses utilize SEMs of observed covariances for both twin types to assess the relative importance of these “latent” factors.
Authors' note: We thank Michael Neale for access to the Mx program for structural modeling and Lindon Eaves for his mentorship. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and editor for their thoughtful and insightful comments.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th January 2017 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.