Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-bjz6k Total loading time: 0.286 Render date: 2022-05-21T09:58:04.878Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Economic Voting under Coalition Governments: Evidence from Germany*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2013

Abstract

This article analyzes the impact of economic voting in federal elections for the German parliament. It combines theories of coalition politics and cabinet decision making—like prime ministerial government, collective cabinet decision making and ministerial discretion—with theoretical approaches on voting behavior to test which cabinet actor voters reward for improved economic conditions. The empirical results, which are based on data from German national election studies from 1987–2009, show that the party of the chancellor (and, thus, the strongest coalition party) benefits most from a positive evaluation of economic policy outcomes. There is, however, no consistent empirical evidence that the coalition parties collectively benefit from perceived positive economic performance. Therefore the findings demonstrate that economic voting occurs in German parliamentary elections, but is targeted specifically toward the chancellor's party.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*Marc Debus is professor of comparative government, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, A5, 6, 68131 Mannheim, Germany (marc.debus@uni-mannheim.de). Mary Stegmaier is a teaching assistant professor in the Truman School of Public Affairs, University of Missouri, 900 University Ave, Columbia, Missouri 65211-6100 (stegmaierm@missouri.edu). Jale Tosun is a visiting professor at the University of Heidelberg and post-doctoral research fellow at the Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim, A5, 6, 68131 Mannheim, Germany (jale.tosun@mzes.uni-mannheim.de). An earlier version of this article was presented at the 71st Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association (MPSA), Chicago, IL, 11–14 April 2013. Grant support is gratefully acknowledged from the German Research Foundation (DE 1667/2-1). We would like to thank MPSA panel participants and the referees for their valuable comments.

References

Abney, Ronni, Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Easton, Malcolm, Ezrow, Lawrence, Kosmidis, SpyrosNeundorf, Anja. 2013. ‘When Does Valence Matter? Heightened Valence Effects for Governing Parties during Election Campaigns’. Party Politics 19(1):6182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James F., Merrill, SamuelGrofman, Bernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Michael R.Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. ‘When Politics and Models Collide. Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections’. American Journal of Political Science 42(1):5596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. 1995. Blaming the Government: Citizens and the Economy in Five European Democracies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. 2000. ‘Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective’. Electoral Studies 19(2/3):151170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J.Hecht, Jason D.. 2012. ‘Voting When the Economy Goes Bad, Everyone is in Charge, and No One is to Blame: The Case of the 2009 German Election’. Electoral Studies 31(1):519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, Rudy. 2000. ‘Ministers as Double Agents? The Delegation Process between Cabinet and Ministers’. European Journal of Political Research 37(3):377395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andeweg, Rudy B., De Winter, LievenDumont, Patrick. 2011. Puzzles of Government Formation: Coalition Theory and Deviant Cases. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Armingeon, KlausGiger, Nathalie. 2008. ‘Conditional Punishment. A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment in OECD Nations, 1980–2003’. West European Politics 31(3):558580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, Hanna. 2003. Explaining Coalitions. Evidence and Lessons From Studying Coalition Formation in Swedish Local Government. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, MarcDumont, Patrick. 2011. ‘Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies’. European Journal of Political Research 50(4):441478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, Marc, Müller, Wolfgang C.. 2012. Intra-Party Diversity and Ministerial Selection in Coalition Governments. Working Paper. University of Lund, Sweden; University of Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee AnnDoerschler, Peter. 2012. ‘Coalition Type and Voter Support for Parties: Grand Coalitions in German Elections’. Electoral Studies 31(1):4659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, KennethLaver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracy. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blondel, JeanMüller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 1993. Governing Together: The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision-making in Western European Cabinets. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuninger, Thomas. 2005. ‘A Partisan Model of Government Expenditure’. Public Choice 125(3/4):409429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E.Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Däubler, ThomasDebus, Marc. 2009. ‘Government Formation and Policy Formulation in the German States’. Regional & Federal Studies 19(1):7395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debus, Marc. 2012. ‘Sozialstrukturelle und einstellungsbasierte Determinanten des Wahlverhaltens und ihr Einfluss bei den Bundestagswahlen im Zeitverlauf: Westdeutschland 1976–2009’. In Wählen in Deutschland, Sonderheft der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift, edited by Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, 4062. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay K.Endersby, James W.. 2004. ‘Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research’. Electoral Studies 23(1):107122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N.Warwick, Paul V.. 2005. ‘The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western European Parliamentary Democracies’. European Journal of Political Research 44(1):1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, Raymond M. 2007. ‘Comparative Studies of the Economy and the Vote’. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, 805844. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M.Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey. 1999. ‘Class Voting. From Premature Obituary to Reasoned Appraisal’. In The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, edited by Geoffrey Evans, 120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faas, Thorsten. 2010. Arbeitslosigkeit und Wählerverhalten: Direkte und indirekte Wirkungen auf Wahlbeteiligung und Parteipräferenzen in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, Lars P.Kirchgässner, Gebhard. 2000. ‘Official and Hidden Unemployment and the Popularity of the Government: An Econometric Analysis for the Kohl Government’. Electoral Studies 19(2/3):333347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fröchling, Henrike. 1998. Ökonomie und Wahlen in westlichen Demokratien – Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1998. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Geys, BennyVermeir, Jan. 2008. ‘The Political Cost of Taxation: New Evidence from German Popularity Ratings’. Electoral Studies 27(4):633648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giger, NathalieNelson, Moira. 2011. ‘The Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Reform. Blame Avoidance or Credit Claiming in the Era of Permanent Austerity?’ European Journal of Political Research 50(1):123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goergen, ChristianNorpoth, Helmut. 1991. Government Turnover and Economic Accountability. Electoral Studies 10(3):191207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Christopher, Bianco, William T., Sened, ItaiSmyth, Regina. 2010. ‘Ministerial Selection and Intraparty Organization in the Contemporary British Parliament’. American Political Science Review 104(2):289306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspar, HannaFalter, Jürgen W.. 2009. ‘Angenähert oder ausdifferenziert? Das Wahlverhalten in Ost- und Westdeutschland bei der Bundestagswahl 2005’. In Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2005, edited by Oscar W. Gabriel, Bernhard Wessels, and Jürgen W. Falter, 202227. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Klein, Markus, Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, Mochmann, EkkehardOhr, Dieter. 2000. 50 Jahre empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland. Entwicklung, Befunde, Perspektiven, Daten. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosmidis, SpyrosXezonakis, Georgios. 2010. ‘The Undecided Voters and the Economy: Campaign Heterogeneity in the 2005 British General Election’. Electoral Studies 29(4):604616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, MichaelHunt, W. Ben. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laver, MichaelShepsle, Kenneth A.. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1986. ‘Comparative Economic Voting: Britain, France, Germany, Italy’. American Journal of Political Science 30(2):315346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, HelmutWeisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. ‘Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes’. Annual Review of Political Science 3:183219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Stegmaier, Mary. 2007. ‘Economic Models of Voting’. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 518537. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Stegmaier, Mary. 2008. ‘The Economic Vote in Transitional Democracies’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(3):303323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Stegmaier, Mary. forthcoming. ‘The VP-Function Revisited: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after over 40 Years’. Public Choice.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M.Rokkan, Stein. 1967. ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction’. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by Seymour M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan, 164. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lanny W.Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2001. ‘Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’. American Journal of Political Science 45(1):3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Daniel. 1974. ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour’. In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by Paul Zarembka, 105142. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C. 2000. ‘Austria: Tight Coalitions and Stable Governments’. In Coalition Governments in Western Europe, edited by Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, 86125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C.Strøm, Kaare. 2008. ‘Coalition Agreements and Cabinet Governance’. In Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe, edited by Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjörn Bergman, 159199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 1994. ‘The Role of German Ministers in Cabinet Decision Making’. In Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government, edited by Michael Laver and Kenneth Shepsle, 150168. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Richard, Lewis-Beck, Michael S.Bélanger, Éric. 2013. ‘Economics and Elections Revisited’. Comparative Political Studies 46(5):551573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, HelmutGschwend, Thomas. 2010. ‘The Chancellor Model: Forecasting German Elections’. International Journal of Forecasting 26(1):4253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, Eoin. 2007. ‘The Power of Prime Ministers: Results of an Expert Survey’. International Political Science Review 28(1):727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappi, Franz U. 2009. ‘Regierungsbildung im deutschen Fünf-Parteiensystem’. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 50(2):187202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappi, Franz U.Brandenburg, Jens. 2010. ‘Sozialstrukturelle Interessenlagen und Parteipräferenz in Deutschland: Stabilität und Wandel seit 1980’. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 62(3):459483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappi, Franz U.Shikano, Susumu. 2007. Wahl- und Wählerforschung. Theorien und Forschungsstand. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr.Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context’. American Journal of Political Science 37(2):391414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattinger, HansFaas, Thorsten. 2001. ‘Wahrnehmungen der Wirtschaftslage und Wahlverhalten 1977 bis 1998’. In Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlaß der Bundestagswahl 1998, edited by Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Max Kaase, 283308. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattinger, Hans, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, Schmitt-Beck, RüdigerWeßels, Bernhard. 2011. Zwischen Langeweile und Extremen: Die Bundestagswahl 2009. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattinger, HansSteinbrecher, Markus. 2011. ‘Economic Voting in Times of Economic Crisis’. German Politics 20(1):132149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, Edeltraud. 2005. The Performance of Democracies. Political Institutions and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saalfeld, Thomas. 2000. ‘Coalitions in Germany: Stable Parties, Chancellor Democracy and the Art of Informal Settlement’. In Coalition Governments in Western Europe, edited by Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, 3285. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Weick, StephanChristoph, Bernhard. 2006. ‘Shaky Attachments. Individual-level Stability and Change of Partisanship among West German Voters, 1984–2001’. European Journal of Political Research 45(4):581608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbrecher, MarkusSteiner, Nils. 2011. ‘Wirtschaft und Wahlverhalten in Westdeutschland zwischen 1977 und 2007: Wer sind die ökonomischen Wähler?’ In Wählen in Deutschland, Sonderheft der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift, edited by Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, 321344. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1975. ‘Social Structure and Politics’. In Macropolitical Theory: Handbook of Political Science 3, edited by Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, 557622. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition’. American Political Science Review 57(2):368377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 2000. ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies’. European Journal of Political Research 37(3):261289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C.Bergman, Torbjörn. 2008. Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thurner, Paul W. 2000. ‘The Empirical Application of the Spatial Theory of Voting in Multiparty Systems with Random Utility Models’. Electoral Studies 19(4):493517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosun, Jale. 2011. ‘Political Parties and Marine Pollution Policy: Exploring the Case of Germany’. Marine Policy 35(4):536541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Brug, Wouter, Van der Eijk, CeesFranklin, Mark. 2007. The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, Guy D.Palmer, Harvey D.. 1999. ‘Cross-National Analyses of Economic Voting’. Electoral Studies 18(1):4967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkin, Sam, Haller, BrandonNorpoth, Helmut. 1997. ‘From Argentina to Zambia: A World-wide Test of Economic Voting’. Electoral Studies 16(3):301316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2003. ‘Partisan Politics, Party Competition and Veto Players: German Economic Policy in the Kohl Era’. Journal of Public Policy 23(2):123156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2004. ‘Destination Anywhere? The German Red-Green Government's Inconclusive Search for a Third Way in Economic Policy’. German Politics 13(1):106131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2011. ‘The 2009 Federal Election and the Economic Crisis’. German Politics 20(1):1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Economic Voting under Coalition Governments: Evidence from Germany*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Economic Voting under Coalition Governments: Evidence from Germany*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Economic Voting under Coalition Governments: Evidence from Germany*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *