Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Bridging the pond: measuring policy positions in the United States and Europe

  • Cory L. Struthers (a1) (a2), Christopher Hare (a2) and Ryan Bakker (a3)
Abstract

Recent work has pioneered the use of expert surveys to estimate cross-national party positions in a common ideological space. In this paper, we report findings from an original dataset designed to evaluate bridging strategies between European and American party placements. Specifically, we compare the use of “anchoring vignettes” (fictional party platforms) with an alternative approach that asks comparativist scholars who live in the US (whom we call transatlantic or TA experts) to place parties and parties in their country of expertise on a series of issues scales. The results provide an optimistic assessment of the ability of TA experts to serve as valid bridges across the Atlantic. The resulting cross-comparable estimates of party positions show instances of both convergence and divergence between American and European party systems, including parallels between systems on the cross-cutting issue of international economic integration.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. E-mail: cdhare@ucdavis.edu
References
Hide All
Adams, J, Ezrow, L and Somer-Topcu, Z (2011) Is anybody listening? Evidence that voters do not respond to European parties' policy statements during elections. American Journal of Political Science 55, 370382.
Albright, JJ (2010) The multidimensional nature of party competition. Party Politics 16, 699719.
Aldrich, JH and McKelvey, RD (1977) A method of scaling with applications to the 1968 and 1972 presidential elections. American Political Science Review 71, 111130.
Armstrong, DA, Bakker, R, Carroll, R, Hare, C, Poole, KT and Rosenthal, H (2014) Analyzing Spatial Models of Choice and Judgment with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Bakker, R, Jolly, S and Polk, J (2012) Complexity in the European party space: exploring dimensionality with experts. European Union Politics 13, 219245.
Bakker, R, Jolly, S, Polk, J and Poole, K (2014) The European common space: extending the use of anchoring vignettes. Journal of Politics 76, 10891101.
Bakker, BN, Rooduijn, M and Schumacher, G (2016) The psychological roots of populist voting: evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research 55, 302320.
Benoit, K and Laver, M (2007) Estimating party policy positions: comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies 26, 90107.
Bonica, A (2013) Ideology and interests in the political marketplace. American Journal of Political Science 57, 294311.
Brady, HE (2011) The art of political science: spatial diagrams as iconic and revelatory. Perspectives on Politics 9, 311331.
Budge, I (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carroll, R, Lewis, JB, Lo, J, Poole, KT and Rosenthal, H (2013) The structure of utility in spatial models of voting. American Journal of Political Science 57, 10081028.
Caughey, D and Warshaw, C (2015) Dynamic estimation of latent opinion using a hierarchical group-level IRT model. Political Analysis 23, 197211.
Clinton, J, Simon, J and Rivers, D (2004) The statistical analysis of roll call data. American Political Science Review 98, 355370.
De Vries, CE and Edwards, EE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: extremist parties and public Euroscepticism. Party Politics 15, 528.
Gibson, T and Hare, C (2016) Moral epistemology and ideological conflict in American political behavior. Social Science Quarterly 97, 11571173.
Hare, C, Armstrong, DA, Bakker, R, Carroll, R and Poole, KT (2015) Using Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey scaling to study citizens' ideological preferences and perceptions. American Journal of Political Science 59, 759774.
Hartz, L (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Hartcourt Brace.
Hix, S, Noury, A and Roland, G (2006) Dimensions of politics in the European parliament. American Journal of Political Science 50, 494520.
Hooghe, L, Marks, G and Wilson, CJ (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35, 965989.
Hooghe, L, Bakker, R, Brigevich, A, De Vries, C, Edwards, E, Marks, G, Rovny, J, Steenbergen, M and Vachudova, M (2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 Chapel Hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research 49, 687703.
Inglehart, R and Norris, P (2017) Trump and the Xenophobic populist parties: the silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics 15, 443454.
Jacoby, WG (1991) Data Theory and Dimensional Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jessee, S (2016) (How) Can we estimate the ideology of citizens and political elites on the same scale? American Journal of Political Science 60, 11081124.
Jessee, SA (2009) Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election. American Political Science Review 103, 5981.
King, G and Wand, J (2007) Comparing incomparable survey responses: evaluating and selecting anchoring vignettes. Political Analysis 15, 4666.
King, G, Murray, CJ, Salomon, JA and Tandon, A (2004) Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review 98, 191207.
König, T, Marbach, M and Osnabrügge, M (2013) Estimating party positions across countries and time—a dynamic latent variable model for manifesto data. Political Analysis 21, 468491.
Layman, GC (2001) The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lijphart, A (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lipset, SM (1977) Why no socialism in the United States? In Bialar, S and Sluzar, S (eds), Sources of Contemporary Radicalism Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 31149.
Lo, J, Proksch, S-O and Gschwend, T (2014) A common left-right scale for voters and parties in Europe. Political Analysis 22, 205223.
Mair, P (2003) Searching for the positions of political actors: a review of approaches and a critical evaluation of expert surveys. In Laver, M (ed.), Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors London: Routledge, pp. 3050.
Marks, G, Hooghe, L, Nelson, M and Edwards, E (2006) Party competition and European integration in the East and West. Comparative Political Studies 39, 155175.
Marks, G, Hooghe, L, Steenbergen, MR and Bakker, R (2007) Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies 26, 2338.
Martin, AD and Quinn, KM (2002) Dynamic ideal point estimation via markov chain monte carlo for the U.S. supreme court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis 10, 134153.
McDonald, MD and Budge, I (2005) Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. New York: Oxford University Press.
McDonald, MD, Mendes, SM and Kim, M (2007) Cross-temporal and cross-national comparisons of party left-right positions. Electoral Studies 26, 6275.
Mikhaylov, S, Laver, M and Benoit, KR (2012) Coder reliability and misclassification in the human coding of party manifestos. Political Analysis 20, 78.
Polk, J, Rovny, J, Bakker, R, Edwards, E, Hooghe, L, Jolly, S, Koedam, J, Kostelka, F, Marks, G, Schumacher, G, Steenbergen, M, Vachudova, M and Zilovic, M (2017) Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 chapel hill expert survey data. Research and Politics 4, 19.
Poole, KT (1998) Recovering a basic space from a set of issue scales. American Journal of Political Science 42, 954993.
Poole, KT (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Poole, KT (2017) The scientific status of geometric models of choice and similarities judgment. Public Choice 171, 245256.
Poole, KT and Rosenthal, H (1997) Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ray, L (1999) Measuring party orientation towards European integration: results from an expert survey. European Journal of Political Research 36, 283306.
Saiegh, SM (2009) Recovering a basic space from elite surveys: evidence from Latin America. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34, 117145.
Saiegh, SM (2015) Using joint scaling methods to study ideology and representation: evidence from Latin America. Political Analysis 23, 363384.
Singh, SP (2010) Contextual influences on the decision calculus: a cross-national examination of proximity voting. Electoral Studies 29, 425434.
Steenbergen, MR and Marks, G (2007) Evaluating expert judgments. European Journal of Political Research 46, 347366.
Stoll, H (2010) Elite-level conflict salience and dimensionality in Western Europe: concepts and empirical findings. West European Politics 33, 445473.
Stone, WJ and Simas, EN (2010) Candidate valence and ideological positions in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science 54, 371388.
Tillman, ER (2013) Authoritarianism and citizen attitudes towards European integration. European Union Politics 14, 566589.
Whitefield, S, Vachudova, MA, Steenbergen, MR, Rohrschneider, R, Marks, G, Loveless, MP and Hooghe, L (2007) Do expert surveys produce consistent estimates of party stances on European integration? Comparing expert surveys in the difficult case of central and Eastern Europe. Electoral Studies 26, 5061.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Struthers et al. supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (161 KB)
161 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed