Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:04:55.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do citizens vote against incumbents who permit local immigration? Evidence from the Mariel Boatlift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2022

Daniel M. Thompson*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: dthompson@polisci.ucla.edu

Abstract

Does exposure to a mass migration event cause citizens to vote against incumbents? I offer an answer to this question by studying one of the largest acute periods of migration in the US, the case of the 1980 Mariel Boatlift during which roughly 125,000 Cubans fled to South Florida. I estimate the change in support for Republican presidential candidates in Miami using the synthetic control method and fixed effects regressions with a panel of county-level and archival precinct-level election results. I find that, while Miami voters dramatically increased their support of the Republican candidate in 1980, this shift was not a local consequence of the Boatlift. Instead, the evidence suggests that Cuban support for Reagan was not a local Miami response to the Boatlift—it happened in Cuban communities throughout the US—but it was most noticeable in Miami because Miami had the largest Cuban population in the US even before the Boatlift. I also present evidence that this change in Cuban voting may have been specific to Reagan and not a broader shift against incumbents or toward Republicans. These findings suggest that, in this case, direct exposure to migration did not lead citizens to dramatically change their voting behavior.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Daniel M. Thompson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of California, Los Angeles. danmckinleythompson@gmail.com, http://www.danmthompson.com.

References

Abadie, A, Diamond, A and Hainmueller, J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of california's tobacco control program. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105, 493505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abadie, A, Diamond, A and Hainmueller, J (2015) Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science 59, 495510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramitzky, R, Boustan, LP, Jácome, E and Pérez, S (2019) Intergenerational mobility of immigrants in the US over two centuries.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, CH and Bartels, LM (2017) Democracy for realists: why elections do not produce responsive /government. Vol. 4. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Allport, GW (1954) The nature of prejudice.Google Scholar
Ashworth, S (2012) Electoral accountability: recent theoretical and empirical work. Annual Review of Political Science 15, 183201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athey, S, Bayati, M, Doudchenko, N, Imbens, G and Khosravi, K (2018) Matrix completion methods for causal panel data models.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansak, K, Ferwerda, J, Hainmueller, J, Dillon, A, Hangartner, D, Lawrence, D and Weinstein., J (2018) Improving refugee integration through data-driven algorithmic assignment. Science (New York, N.Y.) 359, 325329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, SO and Fetzer, T (2016) Does migration cause extreme voting.Google Scholar
Borjas, GJ (2017) The wage impact of the Marielitos: a reappraisal. ILR Review 70, 10771110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, T, Valentino, NA and Suhay., E (2008) What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science 52, 959978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, BE, Citrin, J and Wong, C (2000) Ethnic context, race relations, and California politics. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Card, D (1990) The impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43, 245257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J, Reingold, B, Walters, E and Green, DP (1990) The ‘Official English’ movement and the symbolic politics of language in the United States. Western Political Quarterly 43, 535559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J, Green, DP, Muste, C and Wong, C (1997) Public opinion toward immigration reform: the role of economic motivations. The Journal of Politics 59, 858881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinas, E, Matakos, K, Xefteris, D and Hangartner, D (2019) Waking up the golden dawn: does exposure to the refugee crisis increase support for extreme-right parties?. Political Analysis 27, 244254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, JC and Rosenbaum, MS (2004) Nice to know you? Testing contact, cultural, and group threat theories of anti-black and anti-Hispanic stereotypes. Social Science Quarterly 85, 257280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doudchenko, N and Imbens, GW (2016) Balancing, regression, difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods: a synthesis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duany, J (1999) Cuban communities in the United States: migration waves, settlement patterns and socioeconomic diversity. Revue du Pouvoirs dans la Caraibe 11, 69103.Google Scholar
Dustmann, C, Vasiljeva, K and Damm, AP (2019) Refugee migration and electoral outcomes. The Review of Economic Studies 86, 20352091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, DW (1997) Presidential decision making adrift: the carter administration and the Mariel Boatlift. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Enos, RD (2014) Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 36993704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enos, RD (2016) What the demolition of public housing teaches us about the impact of racial threat on political behavior. American Journal of Political Science 60, 123142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, JD (1999) Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. In B. Mann, A. Przeworski, and S. C. Stokes (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge University Press, 55–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, MP (1981) Retrospective voting in American national elections.Google Scholar
Garcia, MC (1996) Havana USA: Cuban exiles and Cuban Americans in South Florida, 1959–1994. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J and Hopkins, DJ (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science 17, 225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hangartner, D, Dinas, E, Marbach, M, Matakos, K and Xefteris, D (2019) Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?. American Political Science Review 113, 442455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, GH, Scheve, K and Slaughter, MJ (2007) Public finance and individual preferences over globalization strategies. Economics & Politics 19, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, C and Xu, Y (2018) Trajectory balancing: a general reweighting approach to causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, A and Malhotra, N (2013) Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science 16, 285306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, DJ (2010) Politicized places: explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, VO (1966) The responsible electorate. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, P and Yang, D (2020) Taken by storm: hurricanes, migrant networks, and US immigration. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12, 250–77.Google Scholar
Manson, S, Schroeder, J, Riper, DVan and Ruggles, S (2017) IPUMS national historical geographic information system: version 12.0 [Database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D and Rapoport, H (2010) Self-selection patterns in Mexico-US migration: the role of migration networks. The Review of Economics and Statistics 92, 811821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, BJ (2013) Acculturating contexts and anglo opposition to immigration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 57, 374390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paluck, EL, Green, SA and Green, DP (2019) The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behavioural Public Policy 3, 129158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peri, Giovanni and Yasenov, V (2019) The labor market effects of a refugee wave: synthetic control method meets the Mariel Boatlift. Journal of Human Resources 54, 267309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, TF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology 49, 6585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reny, TT and Newman, BJ (2018) Protecting the right to discriminate: the second great migration and racial threat in the American West. American Political Science Review 112, 11041110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjaastad, LA (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy 70, 8093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, PM, Hagendoorn, L and Prior, M (2004) Predisposing factors and situational triggers: exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review 98, 3549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmayr, A (2021) Contact versus exposure: refugee presence and voting for the far right. Review of Economics and Statistics 103, 310327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabellini, M (2018) Gifts of the immigrants, woes of the natives: lessons from the age of mass migration.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, MC (1998) How white attitudes vary with the racial composition of local populations: numbers count. American Sociological Review 63, 512535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Analysis 25, 5776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Thompson supplementary material

Thompson supplementary material

Download Thompson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 346.3 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Thompson Dataset

Link