Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:35:54.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

General Household Emergency Preparedness: A Comparison Between Veterans and Nonveterans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2014

Claudia Der-Martirosian*
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, North Hills, California USA
Tara Strine
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Atlanta, Georgia USA
Mangwi Atia
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, North Hills, California USA
Karen Chu
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, North Hills, California USA
Michael N. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, North Hills, California USA
Aram Dobalian
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, North Hills, California USA Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California USA
*
Correspondence: Claudia Der-Martirosian, PhD Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center 16111 Plummer St. MS-152 North Hills, California 91343 USA E-mail Claudia.Der-Martirosian@va.gov

Abstract

Background

Despite federal and local efforts to educate the public to prepare for major emergencies, many US households remain unprepared for such occurrences. United States Armed Forces veterans are at particular risk during public health emergencies as they are more likely than the general population to have multiple health conditions.

Methods

This study compares general levels of household emergency preparedness between veterans and nonveterans by focusing on seven surrogate measures of household emergency preparedness (a 3-day supply of food, water, and prescription medications, a battery-operated radio and flashlight, a written evacuation plan, and an expressed willingness to leave the community during a mandatory evacuation). This study used data from the 2006 through 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a state representative, random sample of adults aged 18 and older living in 14 states.

Results

The majority of veteran and nonveteran households had a 3-day supply of food (88% vs 82%, respectively) and prescription medications (95% vs 89%, respectively), access to a working, battery-operated radio (82% vs 77%, respectively) and flashlight (97% vs 95%, respectively), and were willing to leave the community during a mandatory evacuation (91% vs 96%, respectively). These populations were far less likely to have a 3-day supply of water (61% vs 52%, respectively) and a written evacuation plan (24% vs 21%, respectively). After adjusting for various sociodemographic covariates, general health status, and disability status, households with veterans were significantly more likely than households without veterans to have 3-day supplies of food, water, and prescription medications, and a written evacuation plan; less likely to indicate that they would leave their community during a mandatory evacuation; and equally likely to have a working, battery-operated radio and flashlight.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that veteran households appear to be better prepared for emergencies than do nonveteran households, although the lower expressed likelihood of veterans households to evacuate when ordered to do so may place them at a somewhat greater risk of harm during such events. Further research should examine household preparedness among other vulnerable groups including subgroups of veteran populations and the reasons why their preparedness may differ from the general population.

Der-MartirosianC, StrineT, AtiaM, ChuK, MitchellMN, DobalianA. General Household Emergency Preparedness: A Comparison Between Veterans and Nonveterans. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):1-7.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Levac, J, Toal-Sullivan, D, O'Sullivan, TL. Household emergency preparedness: a literature review. J Community Health. 2012;37:725-733.Google Scholar
2. Falkiner, L. Impact analysis of the Canadian Red Cross Expect the Unexpected Program. http://www.redcross.ca/cmslib/general/imact_analysis_full_version.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Enarson, E, Walsh, S. Integrating emergency management and high-risk populations: Survey report and action recommendations. www.redcross.ca/cmslib/general/dm_high_risk_populations.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2013.Google Scholar
4. Anderson-Berry, L, King, D. Mitigation of the impact of tropical cyclones in northern Australia through community capacity enhancement. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 2005;10(3):367-392.Google Scholar
5. Lemyre, L, Gibson, S, Zlepenig, J, Meyer-Macleod, R, Boutette, P. Emergency preparedness for higher risk populations: psychological considerations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009;134(3-4):207-214.Google Scholar
6. Brouwer, R, Akter, S, Brander, L, Haque, E. Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Anal. 2007;27(2):313-326.Google Scholar
7. Cross, JA. Megacities and small towns: different perspectives on hazard vulnerability. Glob Environ Change. 2001;3(2):63-80.Google Scholar
8. Donner, WR. The political ecology of disaster: an analysis of factor influencing US tornado fatalities and injuries, 1998-2000. Demography. 2007;44(3):669-685.Google Scholar
9. Finch, C, Enrich, CT, Cutter, SL. Disaster disparities and differential recovery in the New Orleans. Popul Environ. 2010;31(4):179-202.Google Scholar
10. Ray-Bennett, NS. The role of microcredit in reducing women's vulnerabilities to multiple disasters. Disasters. 2010;34(1):240-260.Google Scholar
11. Eisenman, DP, Zhou, Q, Ong, M, Asch, S, Glick, D, Long, A. Variations in disaster preparedness by mental health, perceived general health, and disability status. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(1):33-41.Google Scholar
12. Smith, DL, Notaro, SJ. Personal emergency preparedness for people with disabilities from the 2006-2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Disabil Health J. 2009;2(2):86-94.Google Scholar
13. Fothergill, A, Maestas, EG, Darlington, JD. Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters. 1999;23(2):156-173.Google Scholar
14. Lamb, KV, O'Brien, C, Fenza, PJ. Elders at risk during disasters. Home Healthc Nurse. 2008;26(1):30-38; quiz 39-40.Google Scholar
15. Brown, DW, Young, SL, Engelgau, MM, Mensah, GA. Evidence-based approach for disaster preparedness authorities to inform the contents of repositories for prescription medications for chronic disease management and control. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(5):447-457.Google Scholar
16. Ewing, B, Buchholtz, S, Rotanz, R. Assisting pregnant women to prepare for disaster. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2008;33(2):98-103.Google Scholar
17. Spence, PR, Kenneth, LA, Donyale, RG. Crisis communication, race, and natural disasters. J Black Stud. 2007;37(4):539-554.Google Scholar
18. Kim, YC, Kang, J. Communication, neighbourhood belonging and household hurricane preparedness. Disasters. 2010;34(2):470-488.Google Scholar
19. Kaufman, DW, Kelly, JP, Rosenberg, L, Anderson, TE, Mitchell, AA. Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: the Sloane Survey. JAMA. 2002;287(3):337-344.Google Scholar
20. Koepsell, T, Reiber, G, Simmons, KW. Behavioral risk factors and use of preventive services among veterans in Washington state. Prev Med. 2002;35(6):557-562.Google Scholar
21. Agarwal, M. Meeting the challenges of veterans with chronic illnesses. Forum: US Health Services Research and Development Service, US Government, Washington, DC, 2005:1-3.Google Scholar
22. Yu, W, Ravelo, A, Wagner, TH, et al. Prevalence and costs of chronic conditions in the VA health care system. Med Care Res Rev. 2003;60(3 suppl):146S-167S.Google Scholar
23. Agha, Z, Lofgren, RP, Van Ruiswyk, JV, Layde, PM. Are patients at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers sicker? Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3252-3257.Google Scholar
24. Dobalian, A, Callis, R, Davey, VJ. Evolution of the Veterans Health Administration's role in emergency management since September 11, 2001. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(Suppl 2):S182-S184.Google Scholar
25. Heslin, KC, Gin, JL, Afable, MK, Ricci, K, Dobalian, A. Personal medication preparedness among veteran and nonveteran men and women in the California population. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(4):359-366.Google Scholar
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency Preparedness and Response. http://emergency.cdc.gov/preparedness/kit/water. Accessed May 9, 2013.Google Scholar
27. Mayo Clinic Staff. Water: How much should you drink every day? http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/water/NU00283. Accessed May 9, 2013.Google Scholar
28. Greenberger, M. Preparing vulnerable populations for a disaster: inner-city emergency preparedness-who should take the lead. DePaul J Health Care L. 2006;10:291.Google Scholar
29. Mileti, DS, Bourque, LB, Wood, MM, Kano, M. Motivating public mitigation and preparedness for earthquakes and other hazards (invited paper). Journal of Hazard Mitigation and Risk Assessment. 2011;25-31.Google Scholar
30. Mileti, DS, O'Brien, P. Warnings during disaster: normalizing communicated risk. Social Problems. 1992;39(1):40-57.Google Scholar
31. Lindell, MK, Perry, RW. Behavioral Foundations of Community Emergency Management Planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press; 1992.Google Scholar
32. Lindell, MK, Lu, J, Prater, C. Household decision making and evacuation in response to hurricane Lili. Natural Hazards Review. 2005;6(4):171-179.Google Scholar
33. Lindell, MK, Hwang, SN. Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Anal. 2008;28(2):539-556.Google Scholar
34. Jackson, E. Public response to earthquake hazard. California Geology. 1977;30:278-280.Google Scholar
35. Vulnerable populations: who are they? Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(13):S348-S352.Google Scholar
36. Lasfargues, JE, Custis, F, Maorrone, F, Cars, J, Nguyen, T. A model for estimating spinal cord injury prevalence in the United States. Spinal Cord. 1995;33:62-68.Google Scholar
37. Seal, KH, Bertenthal, D, Miner, CR, Sen, S, Marmar, C. Bringing the war back home: mental health disorders among 103,788 US veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan seen at Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(5):476-482.Google Scholar
38. Fargo, J, Metraux, S, Byrne, T, Munley, E, et al. Prevalence and risk of homelessness among US veterans. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E45.Google Scholar