Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:21:51.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human Health Concerns from Pet Ownership After a Tornado

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Sebastian E. Heath*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, School of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana
Max Champion
Affiliation:
Tippecanoe County Humane Society, Lafayette, Indiana
*
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, School of Veterinary Medicine, 1249 Lynn Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1249USA

Abstract

Introduction:

Although 50% to 60% of North American households own pets and many of these pets are considered family members, there is little information on the impact pet ownership on pet-owning families affected by disasters.

Methods:

This case report describes some of the effects of a tornado on 17 families whose dwellings were destroyed. The setting was a typical urban trailer park.

Results:

After a tornado at the Sagamore Village Trailer Park in north central Indiana, 104 families were evacuated. Seventeen (16.3%) of these families owned pets. For 14 families (13.5%), pet ownership had an important impact on the families' recovery from the tornado. Public- and mental-health concerns that arose from pet ownership included failure to evacuate a dangerous site, attempts to re-enter a dangerous site, separation anxiety leading to psychosomatic disturbances, and the need for additional animal care.

Conclusions:

In urban disasters, the behaviors of families with a human-animal bond are likely to pose a significant risk to their own and others' health and safety in urban disasters. In this small study of families affected by a tornado, the most prominent public-health concerns were failure to evacuate because of a pet and attempts of re-entry to save a pet; the most common mental-health concerns resulted from separation anxiety from a pet and refusal to accept medical treatment until a pet's well-being can be assured. These are thought to be typical issues that will arise out of the human-animal bond in urban disaster situations and differ considerably from traditional public-health concerns over dog bites, spread of zoonotic diseases, and human food contamination. Medical disaster preparedness planning should consider the substantial effects that the human-animal bond is likely to have on human recovery from large-scale urban disasters.

Type
Case Report
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nassar, R, Mosier, J: Projections of pet populations from census demographic data. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;198:11571159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Linnabary, RD, New, JC, Hall, RF, et al. : Attitudinal survey of Tennessee beef producers regarding evacuation during and emergency. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;199:10221026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Linnabary, RD, New, JC: Results of a survey of emergency evacuation of dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;202:12381242.Google Scholar
4. Linnabary, RD, New, JC, Vogt, BM, et al. : Emergency evacuation of horses—A Madison County, Kentucky survey. Journal of Equine Veterinarian Science 1993;13:153158.Google Scholar
5. Beck, AM, Katcher, AH: Between pets and people: The importance of animal companionship. New York: GP Pytnam's Sons, 1983.Google Scholar