Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T00:59:26.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Asian Tsunami: Pan-American Health Organization Disaster Guidelines in Action in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Nobhojit Roy*
Affiliation:
Michael Moles fellow in Disaster Medicine (2005–2007), World Association of Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WADEM), Head, Department of Surgery, BARC Hospital, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai, India
*
Nobhojit Roy, MS #601, Balaji Apts., Sector-15 Nervl, New Mumbai 400 706 India E-mail: nobsroy@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction:

On 26 December 2004, an earthquake (9.0 Richter, 10 kilometers below the sea) near Sumatra, Indonesia, triggered a tsunami, which traveled at approximately 800 km per hour to strike the Indian coastline. The disaster response at a 100-bed hospital situated on the beach front (2,028 km from the epi-center) is described.This paper underlines the benefit of the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines for Natural Disasters in the Indian setting.

Methods:

The demand on the healthcare system in the affected study area (50 km2, 40,000 population) was assessed in terms of preparedness, response time, casualties, personnel, and resources. Other disaster issues studied included: (1) the disposal of the dead; (2) sanitation; (3) water supply; (4) food; (5) the role of the media; and (6) rehabilitation. Two hospital paramedics administered a disaster-related questionnaire in the local language to the victims (or an accompanying person) upon arrival at the hospital. Personalinterviews with administrative officials involved in incident management, aid, volunteers, and response, also were conducted.The outreach programs consisted of medical camps, health education, re-chlorination of contaminated drinking water, and spraying bleaching powder on wet floor areas.

Results:

The total death toll in the area was 62 (with 56, four, and two bodies being recovered on Day 1, 2, and 3 respectively). There were 17 deceased males and 45 females. The bodies immediately were handed over to the relatives upon identification or sent to the mortuary. The attendance in the makeshift accident-and-emergency department on the day of the Tsunami was 219, surged to 339 patients on Day 2, and returned to baseline census on Day 7. Essentially, injuries were minor, and two children with pulmonary edema secondary to salt-water drowning recovered fully. The hospital was cleaned of debris and seaweed on Day 3 and the equipment was restored, but it remained only partially functional. This is because many staff members did not come to work because of rumors that another tsunami was imminent.There were no outbreaks of water-borne illnesses. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms such as panic attacks, nightmares, insomnia, fear of water, being startled by loud sounds, and palpitations were detected in 17% of the patients.

Conclusions:

After an event, medical rescue personnel often are instructed by well-meaning authorities to conduct interventions and response, which have high visibility in the media. However, strictly adhering to the Pan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization guidelines proved to be cost-effective in terms of resource allocations and disaster responses in the Tsunami-affected areas. Unnecessary mass vaccinations, mass disposal of dead bodies without identification, and an influx of untrained volunteers were avoided. Inappropriate aid by developed nations often is unmindful of the victims'needs and self-esteem. The survivors demonstrated natural coping mechanisms and resilience, which only required time and psychosocial support.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Relief Coordination Program of the Pan-American Health Organization: Principles of Disaster Mitigation in Health Facilities. Washington, DC: Pan-American Health Organization; 2000.Google Scholar
2.World Health Organization/Pan-American Health Organization: Guidelines for the use of foreign field hospitals in the aftermath of sudden onset disasters. Prehosp Disast Med 2003;18(4):278290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Shoaf, KI, Sareen, HR, Nguyen, LH, Bourque, LB: Injuries as a result of California earthquakes in the past decade. Disasters 1998;22:218235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Kuwagata, Y, Oda, J, Tanaka, H et al. : Analysis of 2,702 traumatized patients in the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. J Trauma 1997;43:427432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Armenian, HK, Melkonian, A, Noji, EK, Hovanesian, AP: Deaths and injuries due to the earthquake in Armenia: A cohort approach. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:806813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Roy, N: Beyond good intentions. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;2(1):3.Google Scholar
7.Chatterjee, P: India's health workers rise to the occasion. Lancet 2005;365;283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Raja Mohan, C: Tsunami diplomacy: Indo-US engagement creates new waves in the Indian Ocean. The Indian Express December, 2004. Available at http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=61829. Accessed 29 August 2006.Google Scholar
9. Staff Reporter: Apocalypse Now: 85,000 dead and counting. India Today (2005). 10 January 2005, pp2433.Google Scholar
10.Whitaker, EE: After the flood: Guidelines issued by the Illinois Department of Public Health.Available at http://www.idph.state.il.us/pdf/aftflood.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2006.Google Scholar
11.Sreenivas, J: In TN, Gujarat shows the way.The Indian Express (Nagpur edition) 02 January 2005, p3.Google Scholar
12.Bhan, A: Should health professionals allow reporters inside hospitals and clinics at times of natural disasters? PLoS Medicine 2005;3(6):e177.Google Scholar
13. Agencies and Sharma S (2004). “Health bomb ticks on”, Hindustan Times (Delhi edition) 30 December 2004, p3.Google Scholar
14.Cooper, DM: Operation Tsunami Assist–Australian Civilian Medical Team Deployment. Prehosp Disast Med 2005;20(3):s113. Abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lanka Lim, JH, Yoon, D, Jung, G et al. : Medical needs of Tsunami disaster refugee camps: Experience in Southern Sri Lanka. Family Medicine 2005;37(6):422428.Google Scholar
16.Fischer, J: Disposal of dead bodies in emergency conditions. World Health Organization Regional office for SE Asia. Technical note no.8 World Health Organization/SEARO Technical notes for Emergencies. Available at http://www.who.or.id/eng/contents/aceh/wsh/ Disposal%20of%20dead%20bodies.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2006.Google Scholar
17.Pan American Health Organization: Unseating the myths surrounding the management of cadavers. Disaster Newsletter No. 93, October 2003. Pan-American Health Organization, USA.Google Scholar
18.Morgan, O: Infectious disease risks from dead bodies following natural disasters. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2004;15(5):307312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Gray, MJ, Litz, B, Maguen, S: The acute psychological impact of disaster and large-scale trauma: Limitations of traditional interventions and future practice recommendations. Prehosp Disast Med 2004;19(1):6472.Google Scholar
20.Najarian, LM: Disaster intervention: Long-term psychosocial benefits in Armenia. Prehosp Disast Med 2004;19(1):7985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Kurien, JT: Tsunamis and a secure future: Indian Ocean Tsunami devastate fisherfolk.Indian Express 26 December 2004:58:50.Google Scholar