Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T19:43:42.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chapter Six: Interventions, Effects, Outcomes, Benefits, and Costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2020

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interventions are actions (processes) by humans to prevent, attenuate, create, or augment change(s). Resources (human, material) are consumed in the production of change. In disaster work, interventions are designed to: (1) affect the probability that damage will occur from an event; or (2) effect recovery. The definitions and implications of the terms: effects, outcomes, outputs, efficiency, effectiveness, efficacy, benefits, and costs (human, material, opportunity) as well as cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit are discussed. A new concept of Best Outcome Without Assistance (BOWA) is presented. Responses and interventions directed at prevention or mitigation of the damage produced must be evaluated from the perspective of their outcomes and to what extent they benefit the societies affected or at risk in relation to the goals and objectives defined prior to implementation of the intervention(s).

Keywords

actionsbenefitsBest Outcome Without Assistance (BOWA)changecostsdamageeffectivenesseffectsefficacyefficiencygoalsinterventionsoutputsobjectivesoutcomesprocesses
Type
Conceptual Framework
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 17 , Issue S3: Health Disaster Management: Guidelines for Evaluation and Research in the “Utstein Style” , December 2002 , pp. 102 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Thompson, D (ed): The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. 9th ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1995, p 969.Google Scholar
2.Ibid., p 432.Google Scholar
3.Øvretveit, J: Evaluating Health Interventions: An Introduction to Evaluation of Health Treatments, Services, Policies, and Organizational Interventions. Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1998, pp 152–154.Google Scholar
4.Thompson, , Dictionary, p120.Google Scholar
5.Berckmans, P, Dawans, V, Schmets, G, Vandenbergh, D: Inappropriate drug-donation practices in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1992–1996. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1842–1845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Autier, P, Ferir, MC, Hairapetien, A, et al: Drug supply in the aftermath of the 1988 Armenian earthquake. Lancet 1990;335:1388–1390.Google ScholarPubMed
7.Ali, HM, Homieda, MM, Abdeen, MA: “Drug dumping” in donations to Sudan. Lancet 1988;335:538–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Offerhaus, L: Russia: Emergency drug aid goes awry. Lancet 1990;336:745.Google Scholar
9.World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Zagreb Area Office: Medical Supplies Donor Guidelines: WHO Humanitarian Assistance for Former Yugoslavia. Version 3.01.09.94. Zagreb, Croatia: World Health Organization, 1994.Google Scholar
10. Øvretveit, Evaluating, pp 110–117.Google Scholar
11.Ibid., pp 105–117.Google Scholar