Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T02:44:59.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparing Training Techniques in Chemical Disaster Preparedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2019

Richard Salway
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States
Trenika Williams
Affiliation:
Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, United States
Camilo Londono
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States
Bonnie Arquilla
Affiliation:
SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Currently, there are no universally accepted personal protective equipment (PPE) training guidelines for Emergency Medicine physicians, though many hospitals offer training through a brief didactic presentation. Physicians’ response to hazmat events requires PPE utilization to ensure the safety of victims, facilities, and providers; providing effective and accessible training is crucial. In the event of a real disaster, time constraints may not allow a brief in-person presentation and an accessible video training may be the only resource available.

Aim:

To assess the effectiveness of video versus in-person training of 20 Emergency Medicine Residents in Level C PPE donning and doffing (chemical-resistant coverall, butyl gloves, boots, and an air-purifying respirator).

Methods:

A prospective observational study was performed with 20 Emergency Medicine residents as part of Emergency Preparedness training. Residents were divided into two groups, with Group A viewing a demonstration video developed by the emergency preparedness team, and Group B receiving in-person training by a Hazmat Team Member. Evaluators assessed critical tasks of donning and doffing PPE utilizing a prepared evaluation tool. At the drill’s conclusion, all participants completed a self-evaluation to determine their confidence in their respective trainings.

Results:

Both video and in-person training modalities showed significant improvement in participants’ confidence in doffing and donning a PPE suit (p>0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was seen between training modalities in the performance of donning or doffing (p>0.05).

Discussion:

Video and in-person training are equally effective in preparing residents for donning and doffing Level C PPE, with similar error rates in both modalities. Future trainings should focus on decreasing the overall rate of breaches across all training modalities.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2019