Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-16T02:53:58.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Data Disaster to Disaster Data: Outputs of the Inter-Agency Expert Group Disaster-related Statistics (DRS) Pilot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Kanza Ahmed
Affiliation:
UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
Meghan Cook
Affiliation:
UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
Fatai Ogunlayi
Affiliation:
UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
Maddie Weir
Affiliation:
Health Education England, London, United Kingdom
Fahad Malik
Affiliation:
UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

A Hazard Definition and Classification Review conducted by the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) and International Science Council (ISC) resulted in publication of Hazard Information Profiles (HIPs). The HIPs provide groundwork for developing a statistical framework enabling better understanding of the true burden of hazards globally. Furthermore, standardized data is critical for effective monitoring of the Sendai Framework, Sustainable Development Goals, and Paris Agreement on Climate Change.

Following the publication of the HIPs, governments and National Statistical Offices (NSOs) have been encouraged to review their systems for classifying, monitoring and reporting on disaster risk reduction with the aim to gradually implement the HIPs in databases and reporting systems.

The aim of the pilot is to provide statistical feedback on the applicability of the reviewed hazard classification and its HIPs.

Method:

The DRS pilot utilizes mixed-qualitative methods:

  • Global stakeholder workshops

  • Literature review to understand the gaps and good practice

  • Utilizing snowball methodology to cascade a survey to DRS international experts.

  • Country-level expert focus-groups.

  • In-country pilots (with Low, Middle, and High-income countries).

  • Delphi Methodology with expert stakeholders to hone recommendations

Results:

596 responses to the survey from across 38 countries and 90 papers were identified for literature review. Survey initially sent to 120 stakeholders, and snowball methodology increased survey reach, particularly to Global South colleagues. Expert stakeholder and country-level focus groups identified a series of good practices and recommendations enabling step-change towards a standardized global statistical framework. Delphi methodology to refine recommendations is underway.

Conclusion:

The DRS pilot has raised global awareness of the importance of using the HIPs in developing a robust statistical framework with usable disaster-related statistics. This will enable greater accuracy of data contributing to Sendai Framework targets A-D. Results of the pilot being used to inform the Office of National Statistics-UKHSA-Wellcome collaboration on developing Standards for Official Statistics on Climate-Health Interactions in Africa.

Type
Lightning and Oral Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine