Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:57:13.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Description of the Prehospital Phase of Aortic Dissection in Terms of Early Suspicion and Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2015

Christer Axelsson
Affiliation:
University of Borås, School of Health Science, Borås, Sweden
Thomas Karlsson
Affiliation:
Institute of Internal Medicine, Department of Metabolism and Cardiovascular Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Katarina Pande
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
Kristin Wigertz
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
Per Örtenwall
Affiliation:
Armed Forces Centre for Defence Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
Joakim Nordanstig
Affiliation:
Department of Vascular Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Johan Herlitz*
Affiliation:
Institute of Internal Medicine, Department of Metabolism and Cardiovascular Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden The Centre for Prehospital Care in Western Sweden Prehospen, University of Borås, Sweden, School of Health Science, Borås, Sweden
*
Correspondence: Johan Herlitz, MPH Sahlgrenska University Hospital School of Health Sciences University of Borås SE-501 90 Borås, Sweden E-mail johan.herlitz@hb.se

Abstract

Purpose

Aortic dissection is difficult to detect in the early phase due to a variety of symptoms. This report describes the prehospital setting of aortic dissection in terms of symptoms, treatment, and suspicion by the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) staff.

Basic Procedures

All patients in the Municipality of Gothenburg, Sweden, who, in 2010 and 2011, had a hospital discharge diagnosis of aortic dissection (international classification of disease (ICD) I 71,0) were included. The exclusion criteria were: age < 18 years of age and having a planned operation. This was a retrospective, descriptive study based on patient records. In the statistical analyses, Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for analyses of dichotomous and continuous/ordered variables.

Main findings

Of 92 patients, 78% were transported to the hospital by the EMS. The most common symptom was pain (94%). Pain was intensive or very intensive in 89% of patients, with no significant difference in relation to the use of the EMS. Only 47% of those using the EMS were given pain relief with narcotic analgesics. Only 12% were free from pain on admission to the hospital. A suspicion of aortic dissection was reported by the EMS staff in only 17% of cases. The most common preliminary diagnosis at the dispatch center (31%) and by EMS clinicians (52%) was chest pain or angina pectoris. In all, 79% of patients were discharged alive from the hospital (75% of those that used the EMS and 95% of those that did not).

Conclusion

Among patients who were hospitalized due to aortic dissection in Gothenburg, 78% used the EMS. Despite severe pain in the majority of patients, fewer than half received narcotic analgesics, and only 12% were free from pain on admission to the hospital. In fewer than one-in-five patients was a suspicion of aortic dissection reported by the EMS staff.

AxelssonC, KarlssonT, PandeK, WigertzK, ÖrtenwallP, NordanstigJ, HerlitzJ. A Description of the Prehospital Phase of Aortic Dissection in Terms of Early Suspicion and Treatment. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(2):1-8.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Acosta, S, Blomstrand, D, Gottsäter, A. Epidemiology and long-term prognostic factors in acute Type B aortic dissection. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007;21(4):415-422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Tsai, T, Nienaber, C, Eagle, K. Acute aortic syndromes. Circulation. 2005;112(24):3802-3813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dixon, M. Misdiagnosing aortic dissection: a fatal mistake. J Vasc Nurs. 2011;29(4):139-146.Google Scholar
4. Rapezzi, C, Longhi, S, Graziosi, M, et al. Risk factors for diagnostic delay in acute aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(10):1399-1406.Google Scholar
5. Hagan, PG, Nienaber, CA, Isselbacher, EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000;283(7):897-903.Google Scholar
6. Erbel, R, Alfonso, F, Boileau, C, et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. Eur Heart J. 2001;22(18):1642-1681.Google Scholar
7. Finkelmeier, BA, Marolda, D. Aortic dissection. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2001;15(4):15-24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Hoke, RS. Die akute aortendissektion diagnose und management in der prähospitalphase. Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin. 2002;39(3):254-264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Afshin Kasher, J, El-Bialy, A, Balingit, P. Aortic dissection: a dreaded disease with many faces. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2004;9(3):211-218.Google Scholar
10. Boother, AM, Eagle, KA, Bossone, E. Acute aortic syndromes. Herz. 2011;36(6):480-487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ramanath, VS, Oh, JK, Sundt TM, III, et al. Acute aortic syndromes and thoracic aortic aneurysm. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(5):465-481.Google Scholar
12. Sherwood, JT, Gill, IS. Missed acute ascending aortic dissection. J Card Surg. 2001;16(1):86-88.Google Scholar
13. Forbes, R, Balderston, G. Aortic dissection mimicking acute myocardial infarction: the perils of prehospital care. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12(4):503-505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Meszaros, I, Morocz, J, Szlavi, J, et al. Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection—a population-based longitudinal study over 27 years. Chest. 2000;117(5):1271-1278.Google Scholar
15. Nienaber, CA, Fattori, R, Mehta, RH. Gender-related differences in acute aortic dissection. Circulation. 2004;109(24):3014-3021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Patel, PD, Arora, RR. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of aortic dissection. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;2(6):439-468.Google Scholar
17. Herlitz, J, Hjälte, L, Karlson, BW, et al. Characteristics and outcome of patients with acute chest pain in relation to the use of ambulance in an urban and rural area. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(7):775-781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Thuresson, M, Jarlöv, MB, Lindahl, B, et al. Factors that influence the use of ambulance in acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2008;156(1):170-176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Li, JZ, Eagle, KA, Vaishnava, P. Hypertensive and acute aortic syndromes. Cardiol Clin. 2013;31(4):493-501.Google Scholar
20. Kosuge, M, Uchida, K, Imoto, K, et al. Frequency and implication of ST-T abnormalities on hospital admission electrocardiograms in patients with Type A acute aortic dissection. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(3):424-429.Google Scholar
21. Kung, SW, Ng, WS, Ng, MH. Aortic dissection in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(2):122-130.Google Scholar
22. Kurabayashi, M, Miwa, N, Ueshima, D, et al. Factors leading to failure to diagnose acute aortic dissection in the emergency room. J Cardiol. 2011;58(3):287-293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Watt-Watson, J, Garfinkel, P, Gallop, R, et al. The impact of nurses’ empathic responses on patients’ pain management in acute care. Nurs Res. 2000;49(4):191-200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Jennings, PA, Cameron, P, Bernard, S. Measuring acute pain in the prehospital setting. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(8):552-553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Davis, DP, Grossman, K, Kiggins, DC, et al. The inadvertent administration of anticoagulants to ED patients ultimately diagnosed with thoracic aortic dissection. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23(4):439-442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Chua, M, Ibrahim, I, Neo, X, Sorokin, V, Shen, L, Ooi, S. Acute aortic dissection in the ED: risk factors and predictors for missed diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):1622-1626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed