Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:48:10.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Is Resilience Useful, Usable, and Used? Outlining the Social Characteristics of a Resilient System”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2023

Olivia Bell
Affiliation:
Kingston Hospital, London, United Kingdom Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom
Christina Pickering
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Neil Denton
Affiliation:
University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom
Eve O'Connor
Affiliation:
UKHSA, London, United Kingdom
Kanza Ahmed
Affiliation:
UKHSA, London, United Kingdom
Frank Archer
Affiliation:
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Caroline Spencer
Affiliation:
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Louise Bracken
Affiliation:
Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Virginia Murray
Affiliation:
UKHSA, London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

The COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the international priority to systemically operationalise resilience in the face of increasing prevalence of complex and cascading hazards. This concept paper identifies the components of a resilient society, establishing the usefulness and usability of the application of ‘resilience’, and proposes the characteristics used by a resilient system.

Method:

Through the review of case-based examples and previously published concept papers, this paper underwent a concept analysis to understand and qualify the characteristics of a resilient community. Through extensive research and critical analysis of disaster risk responses both effective and not, the authors condensed the literature to identify the key components of a resilient society.

Results:

To respond to this evolving landscape of disaster risk, community and governmental responses should be collaborative in order to be successful and sustainable to increase resilience across communities, societies and networks. To unpick the complexity of how communities and governments might promote resilience effectively, we explore whether community and social capital are useful resources to create and sustain resilient approaches to disaster risk reduction and management. We consider that by exploring how social capital links, bridges and bonds actors within a system are qualitative key facets of a resilient community. A resilient system is the product of trust and collaboration between asset-based networks of bonded and bridged communities and risk and support-based networks of bonded and bridged organizations.

Conclusion:

By evaluating the usefulness and usability of the concept, we consider that a resilient system is an iterative learning process, asset based, trusting across power and resource gradients and is best built before or even if essential during a crisis. Noting that resilience is a dynamic process which requires integrated collaboration and continual adjustment to develop a sustainable framework, we consider that social characteristics of a resilient system are useful, useable and should be used.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine