Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:51:33.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Model for Evaluating the Impact of Major System Changes on Emergency Air Medical Scene Responses in a Regional EMS System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Daniel W. Spaite ,
Toni Brophy ,
Terence D. Valenzuela ,
Harvey W. Meislin ,
Elizabeth A. Criss  and
Paul Hinsberg
Daniel W. Spaite*
Affiliation:
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Toni Brophy
Affiliation:
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Terence D. Valenzuela
Affiliation:
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Harvey W. Meislin
Affiliation:
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Elizabeth A. Criss
Affiliation:
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
Paul Hinsberg
Affiliation:
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
*
Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 North Cambell, Tucson, AZ 85724USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hypothesis:

Centralized dispatch data can provide useful information regarding the impact of major air medical system changes in a regional emergency medical services (EMS) system.

Methods:

Prospective evaluation of helicopter dispatch data from a centralized EMS dispatch agency. During the study period, four alterations in the total number of helicopters available to the system occurred (1,2,3,2,3). Statistical analysis consisted of Chi-Square with Yates' correction and comparison of sample proportions with p<.05 considered significant.

Results:

A total of 667 helicopter dispatches occurred during the 20-month study period from April 1989 through November 1990.

Conclusion:

Changes in dispatch patterns could result either from increased availability or alterations in the dispatchers' “threshold” for use based upon a perceived lessening of the need to save a “scarce” resource. Had the second possibility played a significant role, the rate of cancellation by ground personnel after arrival at the scene would be expected to have increased. Since this did not occur, it is likely that the increased use actually was a result of increased availability. In systems that dispatch helicopters prior to arrival of ground personnel, this method of evaluation may provide a useful model for analyzing the impact of major system alterations.

Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 19 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rademaker, AW, Powell, DG, Read, JH: Inappropriate use and unmet need in paramedic and non-paramedic ambulance systems. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Santer, LJ, Yamashita, TS, Krug, SE: Inappropriate use and unmet need in emergency medical services for children. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:483. Abstract.Google Scholar
3. Gibson, G: Measures of emergency ambulance effectiveness: Unmet need and inappropriate use. JACEP 1977;6:389–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Braun, O, McCallion, R, Fazackerley, J: Characteristics of midsized urban EMS systems. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:536–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Valenzuela, TD, Criss, EA, Spaite, DW et al. : Cost effectiveness analysis of paramedic services in the treatment of prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1407–1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Cadigan, RT, Bugarin, CE: Predicting demand for emergency ambulance service. Ann Emerg Med 1989;18:618–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Pepe, PE, Kelly, JE, Ivy, MV et al. : Resource utilization and impact of using fire apparatus for a fully integrated EMS first-responder program. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:488. Abstract.Google Scholar
8. Valenzuela, TD, Goldberg, J, Keeley, KT et al. : Computer modeling of emergency medical services system performance. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:898–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Curka, PA, Pepe, PE, Ginger, VF et al. : Computer-aided priority dispatch: Ability of a computerized triage system to safely spare paramedics from responses not requiring advanced life support. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:446. Abstract.Google Scholar
10. Williams, KA, Aghabamian, R, Shaughnessy, M: Statewide helicopter utilization review: The Massachusetts experience. J Air Med Transport 1990;9:14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Jablonowski, A: Position paper on the appropriate use of emergency air medical services. J Air Med Transport 1990;9:29–33.Google Scholar
12. Travers, DA, Means, J, Riordan, J: Determining appropriate use of an air medical program. J Air Med Transport 1989;8:7–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed