Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T17:57:40.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction and Risk Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Paul F. Krumpe
Affiliation:
Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.

Extract

Prediction of natural phenomena which have the potential for causing disasters is an extremely difficult proposition both from a scientific and socio-political perspective. Experience has shown repeatedly our inability to predict events leading to disasters. Geophysical predictions, in order to have maximum utility, must specify the date, time, place and magnitude of physical events. In order to meet the minimum criteria for effectiveness and credibility, predictions must be stated within limits which are useful to the public and can be practically applied. Perhaps the best way to deal with the inevitable conflicts and uncertainties associated with the problem of disaster prediction is to either not make such pronouncements or issue forecasts based on the likelihood or probability of event occurrence. In the latter case it is best to provide simplified thresholds for various threat levels and suggest appropriate actions necessary to avert the impacts of an event.

Type
Papers from the Second International Assembly on Emergency Medical Services: Focus on Disasters, Baltimore, Maryland, April, 1986
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)