Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-21T09:52:09.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where are People Dying in Disasters, and Where is it Being Studied? A Mapping Review of Scientific Articles on Tropical Cyclone Mortality in English and Chinese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2022

Caleb Dresser Open the ORCID record for Caleb Dresser [Opens in a new window] ,
Alexander Hart ,
Alex Kwok-Keung Law ,
Grace Yen Yen Poon ,
Gregory Ciottone  and
Satchit Balsari
Caleb Dresser*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Alexander Hart
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA; Director of Research, Disaster Medicine Fellowship, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Alex Kwok-Keung Law
Affiliation:
Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Grace Yen Yen Poon
Affiliation:
Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Gregory Ciottone
Affiliation:
Director, Disaster Medicine Fellowship, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Satchit Balsari
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
*
Correspondence: Caleb Dresser, MD, MPH Department of Emergency Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 1 Deaconess Rd, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA E-mail: cdresser@bidmc.harvard.edu; calebdresser@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Tropical cyclones are a recurrent, lethal hazard. Climate change, demographic, and development trends contribute to increasing hazards and vulnerability. This mapping review of articles on tropical cyclone mortality assesses geographic publication patterns, research gaps, and priorities for investigation to inform evidence-based risk reduction.

Methods:

A mapping review of published scientific articles on tropical cyclone-related mortality indexed in PubMed and EMBASE (English) and SINOMED and CNKI (Chinese), focusing on research approach, location, and storm information, was conducted. Results were compared with data on historical tropical cyclone disasters.

Findings:

A total of 150 articles were included, 116 in English and 34 in Chinese. Nine cyclones accounted for 61% of specific event analyses. The United States (US) reported 0.76% of fatalities but was studied in 51% of articles, 96% in English and four percent in Chinese. Asian nations reported 90.4% of fatalities but were studied in 39% of articles, 50% in English and 50% in Chinese. Within the US, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania experienced 4.59% of US tropical cyclones but were studied in 24% of US articles. Of the 12 articles where data were collected beyond six months from impact, 11 focused on storms in the US. Climate change was mentioned in eight percent of article abstracts.

Interpretation:

Regions that have historically experienced high mortality from tropical cyclones have not been studied as extensively as some regions with lower mortality impacts. Long-term mortality and the implications of climate change have not been extensively studied nor discussed in most settings. Research in highly impacted settings should be prioritized.

Keywords

cyclonic stormsdisaster medicinemortality

Information

Type
Research Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 409 - 416
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Introduction

Tropical cyclones, also known as hurricanes and typhoons, are among the most destructive weather events on earth. While preparedness efforts have helped reduce mortality, Reference Jha, Basu and Basu1–Reference Lurie, Finne and Worrall4 advances have been uneven and large numbers of fatalities continue to occur. Reference Guha Sapir5–Reference Guha-Sapir and Vogt8 Prediction 9–12 and communication 13–16 advances have not been uniformly implemented world-wide, and optimal risk reduction strategies may vary substantially depending on geographic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. It is currently unclear how well existing research aligns with information needs.

Successful interventions such as reversal of traffic flow on highways during evacuations in the United States (US) or use of elevated concrete cyclone shelters in Bangladesh are typically developed, evaluated, and improved through a combination of research and practical knowledge of the setting in question. Reference Jha, Basu and Basu1,Reference Haque, Hashizume, Kolivras, Overgaard, Das and Yamamoto2,17 Information on human mortality due to cyclones can also catalyze government policies and other interventions. Reference Sills, Vroman, Wahl and Schwanz18–Reference Stover and Vinck20 A geographically and culturally diverse global research base is thus essential to support timely, situationally appropriate decision making.

Geographically diverse research is also necessary because climate change, demographic, and development trends may contribute to increasing hazards and vulnerability, and optimal interventions to address these issues vary widely across the globe. Warming, rising seas mean that tropical cyclones may exhibit more rapid intensification, Reference Balguru and Leung21,Reference Bhatia, Vecchi and Knutson22 increasing wind intensity and rainfall, Reference Ting, Kossin, Camargo and Li23,Reference Knutson, Camargo and Chan24 higher risk of prolonged impacts due to stalling, Reference Hall and Kossin25,Reference Kossin26 more extreme storm surges, Reference Marsooli, Lin, Emanuel and Feng27–Reference Xiao and Tang29 and exposure of new regions to cyclones. Reference Knutson, Camargo and Chan24,Reference Kossin, Emanuel and Vecchi30 Many affected nations expect substantial population growth; 31 one model suggests that by 2030, approximately 140 million people will be exposed to tropical cyclones annually, many in low- and middle-income countries of Asia and Africa. Reference Peduzzi, Chatenoux and Dao32 Migration toward coastal cities, Reference Rigaud33–Reference Aerts, Botzen, Emanuel, Lin, de Moel and Michel-Kerjan35 settlement of floodplains and steep hillsides, Reference Doran, McCormack and Johns36–Reference Aune, Gesch and Smith38 loss of protective coastal marshes and mangroves, Reference Das and Vincent3,Reference Del Valle, Eriksson, Ishizawa and Miranda39,Reference Sun and Carson40 and reliance on engineered defenses Reference Liu41–Reference Zimmerman, Foster and Gonzalez43 may affect vulnerability. Research on the implications of each of these trends is needed to guide policy.

In addition, recent studies show that impacts from tropical cyclones can extend well beyond the date of the storm. Following Hurricane Maria (2017) in Puerto Rico, the official death toll of 64 prompted multiple studies which showed that thousands had lost their lives in the ensuing months. Reference Kishore, Marques and Mahmud6,Reference Santos-Burgoa, Sandberg and Suarez7,Reference Death19,Reference Cruz-Cano and Mead44 Similar mortality dynamics have been noted in other settings; Reference Kishore, Marques and Mahmud6,Reference Santos-Burgoa, Sandberg and Suarez7,Reference Swerdel, Janevic, Cosgrove and Kostis45–Reference Dosa, Feng, Hyer, Brown, Thomas and Mor49 long-term, all-cause excess mortality may differ substantially from immediate mortality figures based on cause of death. However, these effects are only identified when specifically investigated, Reference Death19 and while uniform reporting systems have been proposed, Reference Perkins, Jacobs and Nadkarni50–52 analysis of mortality remains challenging.

Growing hazards related to climate change, worsening vulnerability related to demographic and development trends, and recent evidence for long-term and indirect mortality effects create an urgent need for research on tropical cyclone mortality that can inform future risk reduction efforts across a wide variety of settings. This mapping review seeks to describe the production of scientific knowledge on tropical cyclone mortality and to identify gaps or biases in the literature with regards to geography, methodology, and content.

Methods

This study consisted of a structured mapping review of peer-reviewed scientific literature published in English or Chinese on the topic of human mortality in tropical cyclones. The majority of peer-reviewed literature is published in English, Reference Hamel53–Reference Amano, Gonzalez-Varo and Sutherland55 but publication volume in Chinese has increased rapidly. 56,Reference McCarthy57 Structured searches were conducted in PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health; Bethesda, Maryland USA [English]); EMBASE (Elsevier; Amsterdam, Netherlands [English]); SINOMED (Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.; Tianjin, China [Chinese]); and CNKI (Beijing, China [Chinese]). Searches consisted of (mortality OR death) AND (hurricane OR typhoon OR cyclone OR tropical storm OR natural disaster) in English and (死亡) AND (飓风 OR 台风 OR 气旋 OR 热带风暴 OR 自然灾害) in Chinese. Results were indexed and duplicates removed. Each article was reviewed by two separate native speakers of the language of original publication. Articles were included if they had a title and abstract available in English or Chinese, were published in or after 1985, studied tropical cyclones, hurricanes, or typhoons, and addressed human mortality as a quantitative endpoint or thematic topic. Studies exclusively presenting statistical techniques were excluded (Table 1).

Table 1.

Article Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Attributes were abstracted by two independent reviewers; fields included publication type, data source, data collection duration, name(s) of hurricanes studied, locations studied, mortality measurement methodology, and whether the paper referenced climate change in the abstract (a replicable proxy for whether climate change featured prominently). Results were supplemented with a global dataset of tropical cyclone disasters 1985-2019 from the Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT; Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters; Brussels, Belgium) Reference Guha Sapir5 and information on cyclone impacts in US states from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA; Washington, DC USA). 58 Analysis was produced using R v3.6.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria). 59

Results

A total of 2,192 articles were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, SINOMED, or CNKI via structured searches. After removal of duplicates, Chinese translations of English articles, and articles that did not meet inclusion criteria (Table 1), 150 articles were retained for analysis (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Results of Structured Process for Identification, Screening, and Inclusion of Articles for Analysis.

Most articles were recent; 94 (63%) were published in 2010 or later. Original research studies accounted for 108 (72%) with other types accounting for less than 10% each (Table 2). Of 82 studies that reported a data collection timeframe, 70 (85%) collected data for six months or less after cyclone impact (Figure 2). Of the 12 studies (15%) that collected data for six months or more after storm impact, nine studied Hurricane Katrina (2005) and only one studied a location outside the US. Of the 150 studies examined, 12 (8%) referenced climate change in the abstract and 42 (28%) computed excess mortality.

Table 2.

Attributes of Articles Included in Analysis

a Out of articles reporting data.

Figure 2.

Duration of Data Collection Following Tropical Cyclone Impact in Published Studies for which Information was Available.

Note: Five publications with timeframes longer than two years are not plotted.

A total of 46 specific storms were analyzed individually. Some were analyzed in multiple articles and some articles discussed multiple storms; a total of 126 analyses of specific storms were identified. Of these, the top nine storms accounted for 77 analyses (61.1%) and the top 20 storms accounted for 103 (81.7%; Table 3). Twelve out of the 50 deadliest storms in EM-DAT (24%) were the subject of any studies identified in this review (Table 4). Reference Guha Sapir5

Table 3.

Tropical Cyclones Analyzed in More than One Article and Associated Mortality,1985-2019

Abbreviation: EMDAT, Emergency Events Database.

a Articles with substantive focus on more than one storm are listed with each storm.

b Mortality based on EMDAT and revised official death toll from Govt. of Puerto Rico.

Table 4.

Mortality and Articles on Mortality in the 50 Deadliest Tropical Cyclones, 1985-2019

Abbreviation: EMDAT, Emergency Events Database.

a Articles with substantive focus on more than one storm are listed with each storm.

b Mortality based on EMDAT and revised official death toll from Govt. of Puerto Rico.

The number of articles studying tropical cyclone mortality varied by storm impact location and are presented with cyclone mortality from EM-DAT (1985-2019) for context (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The US reported 3,167 fatalities (0.76% of global mortality) during this period Reference Guha Sapir5 but was the subject of 77 published articles (51%), 74 (96%) in English and three (4%) in Chinese. China reported 10,489 fatalities (2.51% of global mortality) and was the subject of 27 articles (18%), five (19%) in English and 22 (81%) in Chinese. Reference Guha Sapir5 Asian nations other than China reported 366,482 fatalities (87.9% of global mortality) but were the focus of 31 articles (21%), 25 (81%) in English and six (19%) in Chinese. Reference Guha Sapir5 Central American and Caribbean nations were the subject of four articles (3%) in English, though they reported 30,706 fatalities (7.36% of global mortality); inclusion of Spanish literature could alter this finding. Reference Guha Sapir5 No studies examined mortality in African nations, although 4,490 fatalities (1.07% of global mortality) were reported in this region during the study timeframe. Reference Guha Sapir5

Figure 3.

Tropical Cyclone Mortality and Article Volumes by Nation, 1985-2019.

Figure 4.

Global Distribution of (A) Mortality Attributed to Tropical Cyclones and Global Distribution of (B) Articles Analyzing Tropical Cyclone Mortality, 1985-2019.

Disaggregated mortality data were not available for individual US states in a uniform format; Reference Kim, Kulkarni and Rajan47,60,Reference Seil, Spira-Cohen and Marcum61 tropical cyclone transits from NOAA (1985-2019) 58 were used to contextualize distribution of the 73 articles on specific US states (Figure 5). Louisiana, Texas, and Florida, sites of multiple recent disasters, experienced 109 cyclone transits (38.5% of the US total) and were the subject of 46 articles (63% of the US total). New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania experienced 13 (4.59%) cyclone transits and were the subject of 17 articles (23%), principally regarding Hurricane Sandy (2012). Other US states experienced 161 (56.9%) cyclone transits and were the topic of 10 articles (14%).

Figure 5.

Tropical Cyclone Transits and Article Volumes by US State, 1985-2019.

Discussion

This review maps geography, methodology, and content for 150 scientific articles on mortality during and after tropical cyclones. While some situations have been studied in detail, for example mortality in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Maria Reference Kishore, Marques and Mahmud6,Reference Santos-Burgoa, Sandberg and Suarez7,Reference Cruz-Cano and Mead44 and in sub-populations following Hurricane Sandy, Reference Swerdel, Janevic, Cosgrove and Kostis45,Reference Kim, Kulkarni and Rajan47,Reference Seil, Spira-Cohen and Marcum61–Reference Schnall, Law and Heinzerling63 the distribution of existing research is not proportional to historical mortality and key knowledge gaps remain.

Published articles largely focus on mortality in the US and China, which together accounted for 68% of the articles identified in this review, despite reporting less than 3.5% of recent tropical cyclone mortality. Reference Guha Sapir5 In contrast, Southeast Asia, Africa, Central America, and the Caribbean were comparatively under-represented in the literature despite high mortality. An analogous pattern was noted within the US; a disproportionate number of articles focused on states in the Northeast affected by Hurricane Sandy, while several Southern states that routinely experienced more storms were under-represented. 58 Future research will be most useful if conducted in settings that are highly impacted by tropical cyclones and in which findings can maximally contribute to mortality prevention.

The articles identified in this review also disproportionately focus on a small number of tropical cyclones that may or may not be representative of mortality dynamics elsewhere. Nine storms accounted for 61% of analyses of specific storms identified in this study; of the 50 deadliest tropical cyclones in EM-DAT from 1985-2019, less than one-quarter were the subject of an article identified in this review. The concentration of articles on a limited sample of individual storms raises questions about the representativeness and generalizability of current knowledge.

In addition, the long-term mortality effects of tropical cyclones remain poorly understood. Only 12 studies evaluated effects more than six months after cyclone impact, and only one of these studied a location outside the US. The mechanisms proposed to mediate post-cyclone excess mortality largely involve pre-exiting medical issues, disruptions of infrastructure, and disruptions of medical care. Reference Kishore, Marques and Mahmud6,Reference Cruz-Cano and Mead44,Reference Saulnier, Brolin Ribacke and von Schreeb64–Reference Burton, Skinner and Uscher-Pines66 It is thus plausible that the degree to which a tropical cyclone affects long-term mortality is related to factors including baseline levels of medical vulnerability, dependence on infrastructure, and infrastructure fragility in the affected area. Reference Kishore, Marques and Mahmud6,Reference Kim, Kulkarni and Rajan47 As these factors vary widely on both global and national scales, it is unknown whether the long-term impacts identified in existing studies are widely generalizable or describe exceptional circumstances. Additional long-term studies are needed, particularly in settings outside the US.

Finally, few studies explicitly evaluated the implications of climate change. Most articles (92%) identified in this review did not mention climate change or related terms in the abstract, which was used as a replicable proxy for prominent consideration of this topic. Given the implications of climate change for tropical cyclone hazards, Reference Marsooli, Lin, Emanuel and Feng27,Reference Aerts, Botzen, Emanuel, Lin, de Moel and Michel-Kerjan35,Reference Bender, Knutson and Tuleya67 consideration of this issue is important; long-term hazard projections provide important context for the study of mortality in tropical cyclones and should be considered in risk reduction strategies.

Future years will likely witness rising seas, intensifying tropical cyclones, and worsening vulnerability in affected populations. Research on tropical cyclone mortality should prioritize lower- and middle-income settings with high historical mortality, examination of long-term effects, and evaluation of the implications of climate change. Prevention of future mortality will depend on the development of evidence-based risk reduction programs and their continuous monitoring for effectiveness during future storms. Policymakers should prioritize increased accessibility of mortality records and support for researchers working in highly affected settings.

Limitations

This review evaluated articles published in English and Chinese; additional articles may exist in other languages and could affect results. Also, EM-DAT cyclone mortality data included a small number of extra-tropical cyclonic storms. Reference Guha Sapir5

Conclusion

Scientific articles on tropical cyclone mortality disproportionately focus on a limited number of storms. The US and China are over-represented in the global literature relative to historical mortality, while nations in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Americas outside the US are under-represented. Substantial knowledge gaps persist; long-term mortality effects are unclear, particularly in low-resource settings. Few publications prominently mention climate change, despite its substantial implications. Research addressing mortality related to tropical cyclones in low- and middle-income settings and over extended timeframes should be prioritized.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare none.

References

Jha, A, Basu, R, Basu, A. Studying policy changes in disaster management in India: a tale of two cyclones. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(1):42–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haque, U, Hashizume, M, Kolivras, KN, Overgaard, HJ, Das, B, Yamamoto, T. Reduced death rates from cyclones in Bangladesh: what more needs to be done? Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(2):150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, S, Vincent, JR. Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(18):7357–7360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lurie, N, Finne, K, Worrall, C, et al. Early dialysis and adverse outcomes after Hurricane Sandy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(3):507–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guha Sapir, D. EM-DAT: The Emergency Events Database - Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL). www.emdat.be. Published 2020. Accessed September 22, 2020.Google Scholar
Kishore, N, Marques, D, Mahmud, A, et al. Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(2):162–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos-Burgoa, C, Sandberg, J, Suarez, E, et al. Differential and persistent risk of excess mortality from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico: a time-series analysis. Lancet Planet Health. 2018;2(11):e478–e488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guha-Sapir, D, Vogt, F. Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar: lessons for public health preparedness for cyclones. Am J Disaster Med. 2009;4(5):273–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NHC. National Hurricane Center Forecast Verification. National Hurricane Center and Central Pacific Hurricane Center. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/. Published 2017. Accessed November 22, 2020.Google Scholar
RS. Sudden Sea: The Great Hurricane of 1938. New York USA: Little, Brown, & Co; 2004.Google Scholar
Larson, E. Isaac’s Storm: A Man, a Time, and the Deadliest Hurricane in History. New York USA: Random House; 2000.Google Scholar
NHC. Hurricanes in History. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/outreach/history/#new. Published 2020. Accessed June 18, 2020.Google Scholar
WMA. SMS based Cyclone Warning System. World Meteorological Association. https://public.wmo.int/en/media/news-from-members/sms-based-cyclone-warning-system. Published 2015. Accessed June 18, 2020.Google Scholar
Nogueira, DF. Mobile-Based Early Warning Systems in Mozambique. Uppsala University Dept of Informatics and Media Preprint. 2019.Google Scholar
Petrun Sayers, EL, Parker, AM, Ramchand, R, Finucane, ML, Parks, V, Seelam, R. Reaching vulnerable populations in the disaster-prone US Gulf Coast: communicating across the crisis lifecycle. Am J Disaster Med. 2019;14(2):121–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AFP. Bangladesh introduces SMS cyclone alert system. https://phys.org/news/2009-06-bangladesh-sms-cyclone.html. Published 2009. Accessed June 18, 2020.Google Scholar
EU, BW. National review of hurricane evacuation plans and policies: a comparison and contrast of state practices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2003;37(3).Google Scholar
Sills, GL, Vroman, ND, Wahl, RE, Schwanz, NT. Overview of New Orleans levee failures: lessons learned and their impact on national levee design and assessment. J Geotech Geoenviron Engineer. 2008;134(5):556–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Death, Arnold C., statistics and a disaster zone: the struggle to count the dead after Hurricane Maria. Nature. 2019;566(7742):22–25.Google Scholar
Stover, E, Vinck, P. Cyclone Nargis and the politics of relief and reconstruction aid in Burma (Myanmar). JAMA. 2008;300(6):729–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balguru, K FG, Leung, L. Increasing magnitude of hurricane rapid intensification in the Central and Eastern Tropical Atlantic. Geophysical Research Letters. 2018;45(9):4238–4247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, KT, Vecchi, GA, Knutson, TR, et al. Recent increases in tropical cyclone intensification rates. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ting, M, Kossin, JP, Camargo, SJ, Li, C. Past and future hurricane intensity change along the US East Coast. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutson, T, Camargo, SJ, Chan, JCL, et al. Tropical cyclones and climate change assessment: Part II. Projected response to anthropogenic warming. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2019;101(3):303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, TM, Kossin, JP. Hurricane stalling along the North American coast and implications for rainfall. npj Clim Atmos Sci. 2019;2.Google Scholar
Kossin, JP. A global slowdown of tropical-cyclone translation speed. Nature. 2018;558(7708):104–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsooli, R, Lin, N, Emanuel, K, Feng, K. Climate change exacerbates hurricane flood hazards along US Atlantic and Gulf Coasts in spatially varying patterns. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliver-Smith, A. Sea Level Rise and the Vulnerability of Coastal Peoples. Bonn, Germany: United Nations University; 2009.Google Scholar
Xiao, H, Tang, Y. Assessing the “superposed” effects of storm surge from a Category 3 hurricane and continuous sea-level rise on saltwater intrusion into the surficial aquifer in coastal east-central Florida (USA). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26(21):21882–21889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossin, JP, Emanuel, KA, Vecchi, GA. The poleward migration of the location of tropical cyclone maximum intensity. Nature. 2014;509(7500):349–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UN. World Population Prospects 2019. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/. Published 2020. Accessed November 20, 2020.Google Scholar
Peduzzi, P, Chatenoux, B, Dao, H, et al. Global trends in tropical cyclone risk. Nature Climate Change. 2012;2(4):289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigaud, KK, et al. Groundswell: Preparing for Internal Climate Migration. Washington, DC USA: The World Bank; 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN-DESA. World Urbanization Prospects 2018. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Dynamics. https://population.un.org/wup/. Published 2018. Accessed November 22, 2020.Google Scholar
Aerts, JC, Botzen, WJ, Emanuel, K, Lin, N, de Moel, H, Michel-Kerjan, EO. Climate adaptation. Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal megacities. Science. 2014;344(6183):473–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doran, KM, McCormack, RP, Johns, EL, et al. Emergency department visits for homelessness or inadequate housing in New York City before and after Hurricane Sandy. J Urban Health. 2016;93(2):331–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, C, Smith, T. Vulnerability of renters and low-income households to storm damage: evidence from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(2):196–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aune, KT, Gesch, D, Smith, GS. A spatial analysis of climate gentrification in Orleans Parish, Louisiana post-Hurricane Katrina. Environ Res. 2020;185:109384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Valle, A, Eriksson, M, Ishizawa, OA, Miranda, JJ. Mangroves protect coastal economic activity from hurricanes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(1):265–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, F, Carson, RT. Coastal wetlands reduce property damage during tropical cyclones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(11):5719–5725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C. Shanghai Struggles to Save Itself from the Sea. In. Scientific American. 2011.Google Scholar
Molinaroli, E, Guerzoni, S, Suman, D. Do the adaptations of Venice and Miami to sea level rise offer lessons for other vulnerable coastal cities? Environ Manage. 2019;64(4):391–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, R, Foster, S, Gonzalez, JE, et al. New York City Panel on Climate Change 2019 Report Chapter 7: Resilience Strategies for Critical Infrastructures and Their Interdependencies. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2019;1439(1):174–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz-Cano, R, Mead, EL. Causes of excess deaths in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria: a time-series estimation. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(7):1050–1052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swerdel, JN, Janevic, TM, Cosgrove, NM, Kostis, JB; Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System Study Group. The effect of Hurricane Sandy on cardiovascular events in New Jersey. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(6):e001354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toldson, IA, Ray, K, Hatcher, SS, Louis, LS. Examining the long-term racial disparities in health and economic conditions among Hurricane Katrina survivors: policy implications for Gulf Coast recovery. J Black Stud. 2011;42(3):360–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S, Kulkarni, PA, Rajan, M, et al. Hurricane Sandy (New Jersey): mortality rates in the following month and quarter. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(8):1304–1307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrickson, LA, Vogt, RL. Mortality of Kauai residents in the 12-month period following Hurricane Iniki. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(2):188–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dosa, D, Feng, Z, Hyer, K, Brown, LM, Thomas, K, Mor, V. Effects of Hurricane Katrina on nursing facility resident mortality, hospitalization, and functional decline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4 Suppl 1:S28–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, GD, Jacobs, IG, Nadkarni, VM, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the Utstein resuscitation registry templates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2015;96:328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Task Force on Quality Control of Disaster Management, World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Nordic Society for Disaster Management. Health disaster management: guidelines for evaluation and research in the Utstein Style. Volume I. Conceptual framework of disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;17 Suppl 3:1–177.Google Scholar
EM, SB, HB, et al. A Framework for Assessing Mortality and Morbidity After Large-Scale Disasters. Washington, DC USA: National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine; 2020.Google Scholar
Hamel, RE. The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science. AILA Review. 2007;20(1):53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Weigen, D. The language of (future) scientific communication. Research Trends. 2012(31).Google Scholar
Amano, T, Gonzalez-Varo, JP, Sutherland, WJ. Languages are still a major barrier to global science. PLoS Biol. 2016;14(12):e2000933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
QX, RF. Bigger than you thought: China’s contribution to scientific publications and its impact on the global economy. China & World Economy. 2019;27:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, N. The Countries Leading the World in Scientific Publications. Statista. https://www.statista.com/chart/20347/science-and-engineering-articles-published/. Published 2019. Accessed November 24, 2020.Google Scholar
NOAA. Historical Hurricane Tracks. https://coast.noaa.gov/hurricanes/#map=4/32/-80. Published 2020. Accessed September 5, 2020.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.Google Scholar
NWS. Weather Related Fatality and Injury Statistics. National Weather Service. https://www.weather.gov/hazstat/. Published 2020. Accessed September 8, 2020.Google Scholar
Seil, K, Spira-Cohen, A, Marcum, J. Injury deaths related to Hurricane Sandy, New York City, 2012. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(3):378–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, BC, Shawn, LK, Connors, NJ, et al. Carbon monoxide exposures in New York City following Hurricane Sandy in 2012. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013;51(9):879–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, A, Law, R, Heinzerling, A, et al. Characterization of carbon monoxide exposure during Hurricane Sandy and subsequent Nor’easter. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(5):562–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saulnier, DD, Brolin Ribacke, K, von Schreeb, J. No calm after the storm: a systematic review of human health following flood and storm disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(5):568–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinney, N, Houser, C, Meyer-Arendt, K. Direct and indirect mortality in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season. Int J Biometeorol. 2011;55(4):533–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, LC, Skinner, EA, Uscher-Pines, L, et al. Health of Medicare Advantage plan enrollees at 1 year after Hurricane Katrina. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(1):13–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Bender, MA, Knutson, TR, Tuleya, RE, et al. Modeled impact of anthropogenic warming on the frequency of intense Atlantic hurricanes. Science. 2010;327(5964):454–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Article Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Figure 1

Figure 1. Results of Structured Process for Identification, Screening, and Inclusion of Articles for Analysis.

Figure 2

Table 2. Attributes of Articles Included in Analysis

Figure 3

Figure 2. Duration of Data Collection Following Tropical Cyclone Impact in Published Studies for which Information was Available.Note: Five publications with timeframes longer than two years are not plotted.

Figure 4

Table 3. Tropical Cyclones Analyzed in More than One Article and Associated Mortality,1985-2019

Figure 5

Table 4. Mortality and Articles on Mortality in the 50 Deadliest Tropical Cyclones, 1985-2019

Figure 6

Figure 3. Tropical Cyclone Mortality and Article Volumes by Nation, 1985-2019.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Global Distribution of (A) Mortality Attributed to Tropical Cyclones and Global Distribution of (B) Articles Analyzing Tropical Cyclone Mortality, 1985-2019.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Tropical Cyclone Transits and Article Volumes by US State, 1985-2019.