Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Implementation of a diagnostic tool for symptomatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a feasibility study

  • Nada F. Khan (a1)
Abstract
Background

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK. Referral guidance can help general practitioners (GPs) identify predictive symptoms of colorectal cancer at an earlier stage in primary care. The objectives of this study were to test the feasibility of a paper-based assessment tool incorporating the CAPER score, a clinical prediction rule for patients presenting to primary care with lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Three different recruitment methods and GP compliance with completing the CAPER score were assessed.

Methods

Patients aged 45 years and above consulting for bowel-related symptoms were recruited in 25 general practices in five regions in the UK. Two recruitment methods were carried out by practice receptionists and one by the GP (GP-prompted). The assessment tool prompted GPs to calculate a score using CAPER; a score of 35 points or over indicated a study referral. Three audits assessed recruitment success, compliance with the assessment tool and clinical outcomes.

Results

In total, 122 patients were recruited into the trial. Although overall recruitment was low, GP-prompted recruitment was more successful than the other two methods. Most GPs completed a clinical examination (92.6%) as directed by the assessment tool; however, only 64% of GPs completed a rectal examination. GPs did not comply well with carrying out haemoglobin (48%) and faecal occult blood (FOB) tests (38%). Only 55% of the final CAPER scores were calculated correctly by GPs. Four patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer; all met the referral criteria for the CAPER score; however, only three met the NICE referral criteria.

Conclusions

Overall, recruitment into the study was lower than expected. GP-prompted recruitment was the most effective. Assessment tool compliance was low, which indicates that in future trials a more user-friendly design should be developed.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Implementation of a diagnostic tool for symptomatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a feasibility study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Implementation of a diagnostic tool for symptomatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a feasibility study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Implementation of a diagnostic tool for symptomatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a feasibility study
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Nada F. Khan, Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX4 1PR, UK. Email: nada.khan@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Barrett, J., Jiwa, M., Rose, P.Hamilton, W. 2006: Pathways to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an observational study in three UK cities. Family Practice 23, 1519.
Cancer Research UK. 2005: CancerStats. Incidence – UK.
Carter, S.Winslet, M. 1998: Delay in the presentation of colorectal carcinoma: a review of causation. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 13, 2731.
Chaplin, A., Curless, R., Thomson, R.Barton, R. 2000: Prevalence of lower gastrointestinal symptoms and associated consultation behaviour in a British elderly population determined by face-to-face interview. British Journal of General Practice 50, 798802.
Cleary, J., Peters, T.J., Sharp, D.Hamilton, W. 2007: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before emergency presentation: a population-based case-control study. Family Practice 24, 36.
Crosland, A.Jones, R. 1995: Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour. British Medical Journal 311, 486488.
Cuffy, M., Abir, F., Audisio, R.A.Longo, W.E. 2004: Colorectal cancer presenting as surgical emergencies. Surgical Oncology 13, 149157.
Dent, O.F., Goulston, K.J., Zubrzycki, J.Chapuis, P.H. 1986: Bowel symptoms in an apparently well population. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 29, 243247.
Eccersley, A.J., Wilson, E.M., Makris, A.Novell, J.R. 2003: Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer – do they work? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 85, 107110.
Flashman, K., O’Leary, D.P., Senapati, A.Thompson, M.R. 2004: The Department of Health’s “two week standard” for bowel cancer: is it working? Gut 53, 387391.
Funch, D.P. 1985: Diagnostic delay in symptomatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 56, 21202124.
Gatta, G., Capocaccia, R., Sant, M., Bell, C.M.J., Coebergh, J.W.W., Damhuis, R.A.M., Faivre, J., Martinez-Garcia, C., Pawlega, J., de Leon, M.P., Pottier, D., Raverdy, N., Williams, E.M.I.Berrino, F. 2000: Understanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution study. Gut 47, 533538.
Grimshaw, J.Eccles, M. 1998: Clinical practice guidelines. In Silagy, C. and Haines, A., editors, Evidence based practice in primary care, first edition. London: BMJ Books, 110122.
Hamilton, W. 2007: Derivation of a score for identifying colorectal cancer in primary care. Gut 56 (Suppl II), A148.
Hamilton, W., Round, A., Sharp, D.Peters, T.J. 2005: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. British Journal of Cancer 93, 399405.
Jones, R., Rubin, G.Hungin, P. 2001: Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working? British Medical Journal 322, 15551556.
Lock, C.A., Kaner, E.F.S., Heather, N., Gilvarry, E.Mcavoy, B.R. 2000: Changes in receptionists’ attitudes towards involvement in a general practice-based trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention. British Journal of General Practice 50, 111115.
Mulcahy, H.E.O’Donoghue, D.P. 1997: Duration of colorectal cancer symptoms and survival: the effect of confounding clinical and pathological variables. European Journal of Cancer 33, 14611467.
NICE. 2005: Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. London: NICE.
Rai, S.Kelly, M.J. 2007: Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system. Colorectal Disease 9, 195202.
Sant, M., Aareleid, T., Berrino, F., Bielska, L.M., Carli, P.M., Faivre, J., Grosclaude, P., Hedelin, G., Matsuda, T., Moller, H., Moller, T., Verdecchia, A., Capocaccia, R., Gatta, G., Micheli, A., Santaquilani, M., Roazzi, P.Lisi, D. 2003: EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990—94 – results and commentary. Annals of Oncology 14 (Suppl 5), v61v118.
Short, D., Frischer, M.Bashford, J. 2004: Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs’ perspectives. International Journal of Medical Informatics 73, 357362.
Silagy, C.A.Carson, N.E. 1989: Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general-practitioners. Family Practice 6, 173176.
Tekkis, P.P., Kinsman, R., Thompson, M.R.Stamatakis, J.D. 2004: The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Annals of Surgery 240, 7681.
Thompson, W.G., Heaton, K.W., Smyth, G.T.Smyth, C. 2000: Irritable bowel syndrome in general practice: prevalence, characteristics, and referral. Gut 46, 7882.
Ward, J. 1994: General-practitioners experience of research. Family Practice 11, 418423.
Watkins, C., Harvey, I., Langley, C., Gray, S.Faulkner, A. 1999: General practitioners’ use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them. British Journal of General Practice 49, 1115.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Primary Health Care Research & Development
  • ISSN: 1463-4236
  • EISSN: 1477-1128
  • URL: /core/journals/primary-health-care-research-and-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed