Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Implementation of a diagnostic tool for symptomatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a feasibility study

  • Nada F. Khan (a1)
Abstract
Background

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK. Referral guidance can help general practitioners (GPs) identify predictive symptoms of colorectal cancer at an earlier stage in primary care. The objectives of this study were to test the feasibility of a paper-based assessment tool incorporating the CAPER score, a clinical prediction rule for patients presenting to primary care with lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Three different recruitment methods and GP compliance with completing the CAPER score were assessed.

Methods

Patients aged 45 years and above consulting for bowel-related symptoms were recruited in 25 general practices in five regions in the UK. Two recruitment methods were carried out by practice receptionists and one by the GP (GP-prompted). The assessment tool prompted GPs to calculate a score using CAPER; a score of 35 points or over indicated a study referral. Three audits assessed recruitment success, compliance with the assessment tool and clinical outcomes.

Results

In total, 122 patients were recruited into the trial. Although overall recruitment was low, GP-prompted recruitment was more successful than the other two methods. Most GPs completed a clinical examination (92.6%) as directed by the assessment tool; however, only 64% of GPs completed a rectal examination. GPs did not comply well with carrying out haemoglobin (48%) and faecal occult blood (FOB) tests (38%). Only 55% of the final CAPER scores were calculated correctly by GPs. Four patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer; all met the referral criteria for the CAPER score; however, only three met the NICE referral criteria.

Conclusions

Overall, recruitment into the study was lower than expected. GP-prompted recruitment was the most effective. Assessment tool compliance was low, which indicates that in future trials a more user-friendly design should be developed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Nada F. Khan, Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX4 1PR, UK. Email: nada.khan@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Barrett , M. Jiwa , P. Rose W. Hamilton 2006: Pathways to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: an observational study in three UK cities. Family Practice 23, 1519.

S. Carter M. Winslet 1998: Delay in the presentation of colorectal carcinoma: a review of causation. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 13, 2731.

J. Cleary , T.J. Peters , D. Sharp W. Hamilton 2007: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before emergency presentation: a population-based case-control study. Family Practice 24, 36.

A. Crosland R. Jones 1995: Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour. British Medical Journal 311, 486488.

M. Cuffy , F. Abir , R.A. Audisio W.E. Longo 2004: Colorectal cancer presenting as surgical emergencies. Surgical Oncology 13, 149157.

O.F. Dent , K.J. Goulston , J. Zubrzycki P.H. Chapuis 1986: Bowel symptoms in an apparently well population. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 29, 243247.

A.J. Eccersley , E.M. Wilson , A. Makris J.R. Novell 2003: Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer – do they work? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 85, 107110.

K. Flashman , D.P. O’Leary , A. Senapati M.R. Thompson 2004: The Department of Health’s “two week standard” for bowel cancer: is it working? Gut 53, 387391.

D.P. Funch 1985: Diagnostic delay in symptomatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 56, 21202124.

G. Gatta , R. Capocaccia , M. Sant , C.M.J. Bell , J.W.W. Coebergh , R.A.M. Damhuis , J. Faivre , C. Martinez-Garcia , J. Pawlega , M.P. de Leon , D. Pottier , N. Raverdy , E.M.I. Williams F. Berrino 2000: Understanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution study. Gut 47, 533538.

W. Hamilton , A. Round , D. Sharp T.J. Peters 2005: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. British Journal of Cancer 93, 399405.

R. Jones , G. Rubin P. Hungin 2001: Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working? British Medical Journal 322, 15551556.

H.E. Mulcahy D.P. O’Donoghue 1997: Duration of colorectal cancer symptoms and survival: the effect of confounding clinical and pathological variables. European Journal of Cancer 33, 14611467.

S. Rai M.J. Kelly 2007: Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system. Colorectal Disease 9, 195202.

M. Sant , T. Aareleid , F. Berrino , L.M. Bielska , P.M. Carli , J. Faivre , P. Grosclaude , G. Hedelin , T. Matsuda , H. Moller , T. Moller , A. Verdecchia , R. Capocaccia , G. Gatta , A. Micheli , M. Santaquilani , P. Roazzi D. Lisi 2003: EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990—94 – results and commentary. Annals of Oncology 14 (Suppl 5), v61v118.

D. Short , M. Frischer J. Bashford 2004: Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs’ perspectives. International Journal of Medical Informatics 73, 357362.

C.A. Silagy N.E. Carson 1989: Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general-practitioners. Family Practice 6, 173176.

P.P. Tekkis , R. Kinsman , M.R. Thompson J.D. Stamatakis 2004: The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Annals of Surgery 240, 7681.

W.G. Thompson , K.W. Heaton , G.T. Smyth C. Smyth 2000: Irritable bowel syndrome in general practice: prevalence, characteristics, and referral. Gut 46, 7882.

J. Ward 1994: General-practitioners experience of research. Family Practice 11, 418423.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Primary Health Care Research & Development
  • ISSN: 1463-4236
  • EISSN: 1477-1128
  • URL: /core/journals/primary-health-care-research-and-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 61 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.