Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T05:40:02.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legislative Procedure in Two Anglo Saxon Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2013

Get access

Extract

About the time a few years ago that a great outcry went up from members of the house of representatives and the country at large against Cannonism and the autocracy of the speaker of the house of representatives, great was the lamentation of the private member of the house of commons. In the United States representatives complained that they were deprived of all power because of the unlimited power usurped by the speaker. In England the complaint was directed not against the speaker—whose functions are those of a presiding officer, and who exercises them with judicial impartiality—but against the government, as we use that term in England, that is the prime minister and his colleagues of the cabinet. The “private member,” I may explain, is a member who holds no office under the government nor has ever held any. He constitutes the rank and file.

Type
Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)