Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:06:26.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Plaintiff’s Diplomacy”: A Review of the Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Susan L. Karamanian
Susan L. Karamanian*
Affiliation:
for International and Comparative Legal Studies and Professorial in Law, George Washington University Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 156 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Slaughter, Anne-Marie & Bosco, David, Plaintiff’s Diplomacy, 79 Foreign Aff. 102 (Sept./Oct 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar [hereinafter Plaintiffs Diplomacy].

2 See, e.g., Weintraub, Russell J., International Law: Establishing Incredible Events by Credible Evidence: Civil Suits for Atrocities that Violate International Law, 62 Brook. L. Rev. 753 (1996)Google Scholar; Aceves, William, Affirming the Law of Nations in U.S. Courts: The Karadzic Litigation and the Yugoslav Conflict, 14 Berk. J. Int’l L. 137 (1996)Google Scholar; Burley, Anne-Marie, The Alien Tort Statute and the fudiciary Act of 1789: A Badge of Honor, 83 AJIL 461 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 McMenamin, Brigid, Bring Me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Litigious, Forbes 180 (Nov. 15, 1999)Google Scholar; Go Global, Sue Local, the Economist (Aug. 14, 1999).

4 See, e.g., Bradley, Curtis A, The Costs of International Human Rights Litigation, 2 Chi. J. Int’l L. 457, 458 (2001)Google Scholar.

5 Plaintiff’s Diplomacy, supra note 1, at 103.

6 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).

7 The Alien Tort Statute provides that federal district courts “shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. §1350 (1994).

8 Filartiga, 630 F.2d at 877.

9 See Plaintiff s Diplomacy, supra note 1, at 107.

10 Id. at 108.

11 Id.. at 110.

12 Id.

13 Id. at 103.

14 See 28 U.S.C. §1605 (West Supp. 1998).

15 See, e.g-., Flatow v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, 999 F. Supp. 1 (D.DC. 1998) (entering default judgment of more than $250 million against Iran and various Iranian officials for state-sponsored terrorism in violation of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act).

16 See Plaintiff’s Diplomacy, supra note 1, at 113.

17 Id.

18 Id.