Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T22:38:21.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of breed on the relationship between food composition and the efficiency of protein utilisation in young pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

D Dotas
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, SAC , Edinburgh West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
I Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, SAC , Edinburgh West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
D H Anderson
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, SAC , Edinburgh West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
G C Emmans
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, SAC , Edinburgh West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Extract

It has been suggested (Kyriazakis and Emmans, 1992a, b) that the material efficiency with which the pig can retain protein (ep), is directly proportional to the energy:protein ratio of the diet (R), so that ep = k.R. This hypothesis accounts for the finding that the rate of protein deposition can sometimes be increased by increasing the energy supply at a constant rate of protein supply.

It is also possible that the constant of proportionality, k, is a genetic variable, although it was proposed, partly for the sake of simplicity, that there would be no genetic effects on the value of k. To test the propositions: (i) that ep is proportional to R, and (ii) that k does not differ between genotypes, an experiment was designed and carried out on two pig breeds which were expected to be very different from each other.

Type
Non-Ruminant Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kyriazakis, I and Emmans, G C (1992a, b). British Journal of Nutrition 68: 603613, 615-625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar