Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:42:27.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dominance hierarchies in domestic cats: useful construct or bad habit?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

J. W. S. Bradshaw  and
R. E. Lovett
J. W. S. Bradshaw*
Affiliation:
Anthrozoology Institute, University of Southampton, SO16 7PX, U.K.
R. E. Lovett
Affiliation:
Anthrozoology Institute, University of Southampton, SO16 7PX, U.K.
*
Email: jwsb@soton.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

In the diagnosis and treatment of behavioural disorders in multi-cat households, it is often assumed that a dominance hierarchy exists between the cats (e.g. Crowell-Davis, 2002). While such hierarchies are probably commonplace among dogs, what evidence there is to support the existence of social hierarchies in groups of domestic cats has mainly been gathered from reproductively entire animals, such as single sex laboratory colonies, and free-ranging aggregations of ferals. For example, Natoli et al. (2001) used receipt of “submissive” (defensive) behaviour to construct a weakly linear hierarchy in a group of 14 farm cats, but this did not correspond to the hierarchy derived from receipt of affiliative behaviour. We have investigated the alternative hypotheses that apparent dominance hierarchies in multi-cat households may actually be based upon territorial behaviour, or some other undetermined social system.

Type
ISAE
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2003 , 2003 , pp. 16
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradshaw, J. W. S. 1992. The behaviour of the domestic cat. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Crowell-Davis, S. L. 2002. Social behaviour, communication and development of behaviour in the cat. In BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Behavioural Medicine (ed. Horwitz, D. F., Mills, D. S. and Heath, S.), pp. 21–29. BSAVA, Gloucester.Google Scholar
Natoli, E., Baggio, A. and Pontier, D. 2001. Male and female agonistic and affiliative relationships in a social group of farm cats (Felis catus L.). Behavioural Processes 53: 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, D. W., Apps, P. J., Carr, G. M. and Kerby, G. 1987. Social dynamics, nursing coalitions and infanticide among farm cats, Felis catus. Advances in Ethology, 28: 1–64.Google Scholar