Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T07:39:04.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of split diets on laying performance and egg quality of hens during the late laying period by manipulating the time of access to calcium and phosphorus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

H. Zarghi
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Islamic Republic of Iran
S. Zakizadeh*
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Islamic Republic of Iran
A. Zeaeei
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Islamic Republic of Iran
Get access

Extract

Nowadays, commercial strains of laying hens lay the majority of their eggs (about 90%) during the morning (Leeson and Summers, 1978). Also, shell is deposited around the albumen when the egg remains in the shell gland. The period of shell deposition coincides mainly in the afternoon and evening. As a result of these processes, hens my have higher calcium (Ca) requirement during the afternoon and in evening. The higher phosphorus (P) requirement in the morning is needed to replace the bone minerals which have been reabsorbed during the previous night when shell formation occurred. (Keshavarz, 1998). Regarding these facts, it has been shown that reducing dietary P during the afternoon and evening had a beneficial effect on shell quality (Roland and Harms, 1976). Hence, we investigated if it would be possible to improve laying performance and egg quality when hens received diets with adequate levels of P only in the morning and Ca only in the afternoon and evening.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Keshavarz, K. 1998. Poult. Sci. 77: 1333–1347.Google Scholar
Leeson, S., and Summers, J. D., 1978. Br. Poult. Sci. 19:417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, D. A. Sr., and Harms, R. H., 1976. Poult. Sci. 55:637–641.Google Scholar