Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T06:23:46.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of pectin on production and urinary nitrogen excretion in lactating Saanen dairy goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

M. Sari*
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran
A. Naserian
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran
R. Valizadeh
Affiliation:
Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran
Get access

Extract

Urinary nitrogen (N) is rapidly converted to ammonia (NH3) during manure collection and storage, whereas faecal N is converted to NH3 at a much slower rate. Developing nutritional strategies to shift N excretion from urine to faeces may reduce NH3 from dairy manure which is implicated in reduced air quality. Previous work suggests that increasing post-ruminal fermentation may reduce urinary N and consequently manure NH3 losses (Gressley and Armentano, 2005). Pectin is a class of neutral detergent-soluble fibre (NDSF) and studies in monogastrics have shown that it is completely degraded by resident intestinal bacteria (Buchanan et al., 1994). Gut bacteria are capable of converting blood urea-N into NH3 and subsequently microbial protein. Therefore, growth of intestinal microorganisms using energy supplied by pectin can result in a net conversion of blood urea N into faecal microbial N, thereby reducing urinary N. The aim was to determine the effect of increasing carbohydrate fermentation in the large intestine on urinary N in lactating dairy goats.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchanan, C.J., Fry, S.C., and Eastwood, M.A. 1994. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 66, 163–173.Google Scholar
Gressley, T.F. and Armentano, L.E. 2005. Journal of Dairy Science. 88, 4028–4044.Google Scholar